>> Watt-32 might get used in some future version of Arachne.
>> For now we must stay with the 16bit WATTCP or we would be saying
>> "goodbye" to those who are still using machines older than a 386.
WAT-32 also supports 16-bit, but the main focus is 32-bit.
Bye, Florian Xaver
www.seal.de.vu
www.
Hi folks,
On Sat, 02 Dec 2000 17:58:41 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Watt-32 might get used in some future version of Arachne.
> For now we must stay with the 16bit WATTCP or we would be saying
> "goodbye" to those who are still using machines older than a 386.
Perhaps there could be 16bit and
On 3 Dec 00 at 1:11, Sam Ewalt wrote:
>>It's hard for me to believe that there are very many left in that
>>category, what with 486's being next to free right now. People are now
>>just giving them away or even throwing them out in the trash.
>>
>>You could certainly buy a slow Pentium system no
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Watt-32 might get used in some future version of Arachne.
> For now we must stay with the 16bit WATTCP or we would be saying
> "goodbye" to those who are still using machines older than a 386.
It's hard for me to believe that there are very many left
On Sat, 02 Dec 2000 00:36:58 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
> Is anyone familiar with this page? It seems to contain all sorts of things that
> might be integrated with Arachne ... in partic
> lar, a 32bit WATTCP , an integrated IRC, and numerous other thingies that look
> appetizing.
> Would one of y
Is anyone familiar with this page? It seems to contain all sorts of things that might
be integrated with Arachne ... in partic
lar, a 32bit WATTCP , an integrated IRC, and numerous other thingies that look
appetizing.
Would one of you gurus, within your copious spare time, check it out and see
