Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-18 Thread Sam Ewalt
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 22:56:35 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > IMHO, > Arachne is still "Michael's baby". > It's not GPL until *HE* says it's GPL. > I *will* wait (no matter how long it takes), > for Michael to say "OK, release it". I think that is the right thing to do. Michael has only said th

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-16 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Glenn McCorkle: > I disagree. > IMHO, > Arachne is still "Michael's baby". > It's not GPL until *HE* says it's GPL. > I *will* wait (no matter how long it takes), > for Michael to say "OK, release it". Through this list, I had the impression that Arachne already had GPL status. Could my i

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-14 Thread Florian Xaver
I am a week behind om my email, so hopefully v1.73;GPL will have been released by now. But since Michael has already released Arachne under GPL, and is no longer involved with Arachne, why do you (Glenn) need his permission? If you really think you need his permission to release v1.73;GPL, remem

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-13 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:46:28 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote: >> v1.71;UE01 is the 'latest release' http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/ >> And v1.73;GPL will be available to the public >> just as soon as Michael releases it. >> (or gives the 'OK' for me to release it) >> Glenn > I am a week

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-13 Thread Thomas Mueller
> v1.71;UE01 is the 'latest release' http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/ > And v1.73;GPL will be available to the public > just as soon as Michael releases it. > (or gives the 'OK' for me to release it) > Glenn I am a week behind om my email, so hopefully v1.73;GPL will have been released by n

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-08 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:44:15 +0100, Mel Evans wrote: > On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 19:42:06 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >>> Where can I get a copy of the "latest" then? >> As I said above. ;-) >> v1.71;UE01 is the 'latest release' >> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/ >>> Been off the list for a

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-08 Thread Sam Ewalt
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:44:15 +0100, Mel Evans wrote: > (Maybe you know of this, it is a whiley since I've been on the list) > The ver 1.70 I loaded in originally is recognised by the arachne home > pages as the "latest" version in the wee bit top left corner where > Michael put the IE/Netscrap box

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-08 Thread Mel Evans
On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 19:42:06 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >>Where can I get a copy of the "latest" then? > >As I said above. ;-) > >v1.71;UE01 is the 'latest release' >http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/ > >>Been off the list for a while as you know! > >Welcome back. We have missed you. >

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-07 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 13:10:24 +0100, Mel Evans wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:46:19 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> However. >> That's not the 'latest version'. >> That one is almost 2 and a half years old. ;-) >> v1.71;UE01 is the 'latest release' >> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/ >

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-07 Thread Mel Evans
On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:46:19 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:55:20 +, Mel Evans, Registered Arachne >User wrote: > >>Hi Gangue, > >>I am gobsmacked! (British phrase to show complete and total >>astonishment)!!! > >>Downloaded latest version onto machine, installed it and up

Re: rach now on tap!

2003-06-06 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:55:20 +, Mel Evans, Registered Arachne User wrote: > Hi Gangue, > I am gobsmacked! (British phrase to show complete and total > astonishment)!!! > Downloaded latest version onto machine, installed it and up and running > with install wizard in less than 6 minutes! This

rach now on tap!

2003-06-06 Thread Mel Evans, Registered Arachne User
Hi Gangue, I am gobsmacked! (British phrase to show complete and total astonishment)!!! Downloaded latest version onto machine, installed it and up and running with install wizard in less than 6 minutes! This is the way it should be! At long last. It's even working with the internal modem, convin