On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:20 +, Peter Howkins wrote:
> We don't need to extend the amount of config to store at runtime as we
> don't extend the capabilities of the binary at runtime (all its
> extensions are currently #define controlled). Should we ever impliment
> a runtime dynamic linkin
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:21:29AM +, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:22 +, Peter Howkins wrote:
> > In preperation for the config file work suggested by Rob, I've checked in
> > some work towards storing the running config of the emulator in a single
> > place.
>
> I've ha
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:22 +, Peter Howkins wrote:
> In preperation for the config file work suggested by Rob, I've checked in
> some work towards storing the running config of the emulator in a single
> place.
I've had a quick look. It seems it just handles command line options.
Which it d
