Re: Further RISC OS port work

2011-10-22 Thread Jeffrey Lee
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Jeffrey Lee wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Chris Young wrote: > >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:53:22 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: >> >>> It wouldn't >>> surprise me if things are horribly broken on systems where 'int' is only >>> 16 bits. >> >> Erm, int is 16-bit he

Re: Further RISC OS port work

2011-10-22 Thread Chris Young
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:11:10 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: > However unless Chris was talking about > the 68k having 16bit ints, I don't see how ArcEm could have ever run on > Amiga, as the most crucial data type (ARMword) has always been defined as > being an unsigned int. Ah, m

Re: Further RISC OS port work

2011-10-22 Thread Jeffrey Lee
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Chris Young wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:11:10 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: * So since the above isn't likely to have fixed the strange hostfs issues Chris is seeing, I've also added a 'OLD_FILECODE' option to hostfs.c. If this is enabled it will bypass m

Re: Further RISC OS port work

2011-10-22 Thread Chris Young
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:21:40 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: > A copy of the stderr log would be useful. It might also be worth switching > the code back to using fseek/ftell instead of the 64bit versions - perhaps > the 64bit versions are somehow broken on Amiga. Woo-hoo! That d