Re: [arch] And we're back...

2005-10-19 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Why don`t you set "allow_call_time_pass_reference = On" in php.ini? Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2005 00:35 schrieb Judd Vinet: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:23:03AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > Just found that: > > > > http://www.archlinux.org/blog/category/general/ > > Fatal error: Only variabl

[arch] php-cgi and lighttpd POSTing problems

2005-10-19 Thread Mark Rosenstand
I'm having some trouble getting php-cgi and lighttpd to play nicely together. I've assigned .php files to be interpreted by /usr/bin/php and added mime-type text/html for .php files. This works well, but when sending POST requests nothing happens. I see an entry in the log but the page doesn't cha

[arch] fftw2 -> [extra] (bug 2969)

2005-10-19 Thread Damir Perisa
the fftw2 package in AUR has some problems: - it is not .la slayed - it is not compiled to contain single + double precission libs - it does not support gcc-fortran (it is not gcc4 compatible for building it) - it contains replaces=('fftw') what is a little bit wrong, becasue they can co-exist (

Re: [arch] And we're back...

2005-10-19 Thread Judd Vinet
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:23:03AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Just found that: > > http://www.archlinux.org/blog/category/general/ > Fatal error: Only variables can be passed by reference in > /home/sites/archlinux/htdocs/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 629 > > HTH Fixed. Thanks. -

Re: [arch] And we're back...

2005-10-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Judd Vinet schrieb: > So this is basically an update to the community, so you all know what > happened and why. Things should be running smoothly again. Let us know > if they aren't. Just found that: http://www.archlinux.org/blog/category/general/ Fatal error: Only variables can be passed by refe

Re: [arch] pacman segfault

2005-10-19 Thread Aaron Schaefer
I too got the same error when doing the same upgrade. Performing it a second time, as suggested, did work successfully though... -- Aaron Schaefer http://elasticdog.com > Hello, > > It is reproducible every time. I got the same error as Mark, and while the > same u

Re: [arch] pacman segfault

2005-10-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Mine segfault too when I removed the apr pkgs and installed the new ones - I would guess it's the remove doing it. Eric Belanger wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Mark Rosenstand wrote: Can someone verify this bug before I submit it to Flyspray? # pacman -S apache Remove: apr

Re: [arch] Multilingual web site for Arch Linux

2005-10-19 Thread Damir Perisa
Le Wednesday 19 October 2005 08:18, Benoit Chesneau a écrit : | About wiki, maybe we can begin the move of french wiki to the   | official wiki. Is there a way to add languages on the left and build   | a better access to languages sections. I mean the top menu is very   | small, and links to t

Re: [arch] pacman segfault

2005-10-19 Thread Mark Rosenstand
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:49:05 -0700, Judd Vinet wrote: > If it's reproduceable every time, please tar up your pacman database > and send it to me. > > $ tar cz /var/lib/pacman/local >pacmandb.tar.gz (Mailing the pacman to Judd off-list.) I know the package database is heavily poisoned by home mad

Re: [arch] pacman segfault

2005-10-19 Thread Mark Rosenstand
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:36:43 -0400 (EDT), Eric Belanger wrote: > Retry it to see if it will seg faults again. Works here: > > $ sudo pacman -S apache > :: apache-2.0.54-4: is up to date. Upgrade anyway? [Y/n] y > > Targets: apache-2.0.54-4 > > Total Package Size: 1.2 MB > > Proceed with upgr

Re: [arch] Re: Better formatting of install messages

2005-10-19 Thread James Rayner
> >So long as the message is readable, I really see absolutely no reason > >to create a standard format. > > > > > Yeah, that's the thing tho isn't it, it's not always readable - how many > times have you missed install messages that were poorly formated that > you simply "Lost" amongst all the oth

Re: [arch] Wanted: extra GNOME maintainer

2005-10-19 Thread James Rayner
On 10/19/05, Michael Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I do have the time, although, I don't have the experience nor the > programming skills... > so to badperhaps in the future :/ > Ditto. I'd consider this, as I do want to become a dev or package maintainer, but I havn't had as muc

Re: [arch] Problem with the forums

2005-10-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Of course :) Damir Perisa wrote: Le Tuesday 18 October 2005 23:46, Philip Dillon-Thiselton a écrit : | DUDE! I already emailed you about it personally but I hope you are | diff'ing the bbs software when you update it or all of my hard work to | make the mod patching reversible has just gone do

Re: [arch] Re: Better formatting of install messages

2005-10-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
James Rayner wrote: On 9/20/05, kozaki.dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:53:30 +0200, Kurt B Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: Has anyone ever devised or suggested a better way of standardizing and formating install messages?