Re: [arch] Judd, we need roadmap!!!

Stavros Giannouris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:30:37 -0500 > Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I wholeheartedly beg to differ. So let's get this straight, you're > > trying to tell me that someone with a SLOW connection would rather > > download hundreds upon

Re: [arch] Purpose of /opt prefixing?

On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:54:14AM +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote: > Hey guys :) > > Would somebody mind explaining the purpose of the /opt prefixing in > many Arch packages? > > I'm just wondering as it's starting to get a bit unhandy as more and > more software ships with optional bindings for la

Re: [arch] Judd, we need roadmap!!!

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:30:37 -0500 Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wholeheartedly beg to differ. So let's get this straight, you're > trying to tell me that someone with a SLOW connection would rather > download hundreds upon hundreds of packages on CDs, the majority of > which he'll

Re: [arch] Judd, we need roadmap!!!

On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:06:51AM -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote: > On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With the exception of one package improperly installed the last time I > > tried it; the ftp install will get you the very latest packages without > > having to install t

Re: [arch] Tip: Use pkgrel=0 for local version bumps

Le Saturday 29 October 2005 01:28, Mark Rosenstand a écrit : | I recently had the need to bump a package. To ensure that I'd get | the official upgrade when it became available I set pkgrel to 0. i use pkgrel=l1 (l=local) or pkgrel=d1 (d=debug) if it is build with debug enabled. greetings, Da

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck1

Thanks again. I was thinking along those lines, but I don't know enough about this stuff to be sure. I've posted it on the wlan-ng ML now anyway. Tom. ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck1

On 10/29/05, Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So 2.6.14-archck1 built, installed, and booted without a problem - nice > one James. However, I have a problem recompiling my wlan-ng driver > against it. The error looks like this (I have included some warnings > preceding the error because they do n

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck1

So 2.6.14-archck1 built, installed, and booted without a problem - nice one James. However, I have a problem recompiling my wlan-ng driver against it. The error looks like this (I have included some warnings preceding the error because they do not appear during a successful build): CC [M]