Eric Belanger wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Andrew Conkling wrote:
>
>
>
>>Maybe there's a good reason for this, but I found that f-spot is in
>>both extra and community, and the community one seems to have the
>>wrong version listed (0.0.13 v. the actual 0.1.3).
>>
>>
>
>The f-spot in commun
Set Option "Protocol" to "Auto" instead of "IMPS/2"
Doug Jolley wrote:
> Hi --
>
> X doesn't seem to like my PS/2 optical mouse. When using it, it
> appears to generate spurious characters at the input so that the
> cursor movement is real jerky and strange commands get sent to
> terminal window
Le Monday 31 October 2005 02:55, Dimitrios Apostolou a écrit :
| > Total Package Size: 1019.8 MB
*impressed* !!!
- D
--
"Sex at the age of eighty-four is a wonderful experience. Especially the
one in the winter." (Milton Berle)
pgpTMQ7wHVnEF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> Maybe there's a good reason for this, but I found that f-spot is in
> both extra and community, and the community one seems to have the
> wrong version listed (0.0.13 v. the actual 0.1.3).
The f-spot in community is an old version. It will need to b
Maybe there's a good reason for this, but I found that f-spot is in
both extra and community, and the community one seems to have the
wrong version listed (0.0.13 v. the actual 0.1.3).
Cheers,
Andrew
--
http://aconkling.blogspot.com
___
arch mailing li
Hi Doug, I also have a PS/2 optical mouse and it works great on my laptop,
here's my complete xorg.conf file
http://linux.mty.itesm.mx/~oestrada/data/files/xorg.conf
The differences between your mouse section and mine is that I don't use the
Emulate3Buttons option and I use /dev/psaux as Device
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 13:49 +, Baron Horatio von Phydeaux XXXVII
wrote:
> I made a patch to put wpa_supplicant support into the new initscripts
> that just came out. I had made a patch for the version in testing a
> while ago and posted it on the forum and filed a bug report hoping that
> supp
Hi Phillip,
Yeah, I skipped phrakture's scripts, but I was unable to set up wpa
support. That's good news that they shortly be included in the standard
scripts. Thanks for lettin me know.
Paul
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 17:13 +, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:
> HALLO!?
>
> If they are phrakture'
Same for the Acer Aspire 1690, just install the ipw2200 module instead.
I tried to use /etc/conf.d/wireless but didn't manage to make the
connection work, iwconfig always tell me that eth0 is unnassociated.
I'm using Kwifimanager instead which works fine, but it would be
faster to set it from a sc
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:30 +0800, wd wrote:
> 1 Install wireless_tools.
>
> pacman -S wireless_tools
>
>
> 2 Install ipw2100(the wireless modules).
>
> pacman -S ipw2100
>
> Then modify /etc/rc.conf ,add ipw2100 to the MODULES line,and eth1 to the
> INTERFACES line,add eth1="dh
> The following should work:
> pacman -Rd gcc-g77
> pacman -Syu
Indeed it worked :-). Thanks.
> pacman -S octave
>
Hold on a minute now, because:
> Total Package Size: 1019.8 MB
>
> Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n]
:-)
___
arch mailing list
arch@arc
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> Damir Perisa wrote:
> > Le Monday 31 October 2005 01:16, Dimitrios Apostolou a écrit :
> > | [...]
> > | error: unresolvable dependencies:
> > |gcc-g77: requires gcc=3.4.3
> >
> > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3346
> >
>
> Thanks, it reall
Damir Perisa wrote:
> Le Monday 31 October 2005 01:16, Dimitrios Apostolou a écrit :
> | [...]
> | error: unresolvable dependencies:
> |gcc-g77: requires gcc=3.4.3
>
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3346
>
Thanks, it really seems like a bug in pacman.
Unfortunately, I removed octave but I
Le Monday 31 October 2005 01:16, Dimitrios Apostolou a écrit :
| [...]
| error: unresolvable dependencies:
|gcc-g77: requires gcc=3.4.3
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3346
- D
--
'It's always a good thing to let a few tales spread, you know. Pour
encouragy le-poor encoura-to make everyo
1 Install wireless_tools.
pacman -S wireless_tools
2 Install ipw2100(the wireless modules).
pacman -S ipw2100
Then modify /etc/rc.conf ,add ipw2100 to the MODULES line,and eth1 to the
INTERFACES line,add eth1="dhcp"(to use dhcp) blow eth0="".
3 Modify /etc/conf.d/wireless a
Hello list,
I haven't updated my system for some time and today when I run "pacman
-Syu" I get the following:
:: Replace gcc-g77 with gcc-fortran from "extra"? [Y/n]
No matter what I answer, after about 5-10 minutes (!) of heavy disk work
I get the following output:
error: unresolvable depend
---
$ pornview pippo.png
** WARNING **: gdk-pixbuf XPM module lacks XPM data capability
** CRITICAL **: file gdk-pixbuf-render.c: line 349
(gdk_pixbuf_render_pixmap_and_mask): assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed.
** CRITICAL
OK - now I think my original thought which is that there are four
separate CVSROOTs - is that correct? Does cvsup only work if you have
separate ROOT rather than modules?
Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I would still like some one to help explain how ABS works with CVS. The
>wa
On Sunday 30 October 2005 14:09, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Does this means that you have removed all IDE support from the kernel?
> > Wouldn't it be better to include support for the simplest system in the
> > kernel, so that no initrd would be needed for typical systems?
> >
> > Than
> Hello,
> Does this means that you have removed all IDE support from the kernel?
> Wouldn't it be better to include support for the simplest system in the
> kernel, so that no initrd would be needed for typical systems?
>
> Thanks,
> Dimitris
>
> ___
> a
On 10/30/05, Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a side note, the information about how to add the initrd26.img is incorrect
> in the documentation. I just updated my test machine and added the initrd
> (hd0,0)/boot/initrd26.img like the docs say and it gave me a file not found
> in grub.
>
>
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:33:57 +0100, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote:
> Sorry for my previous answer, I didn't see your last message.
>
> 2005/10/30, Mark Rosenstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Err, of course I meant the filesystem containing the modules,
> > i.e. /lib.
>
> That would be the initrd files
Hello all,
I would still like some one to help explain how ABS works with CVS. The
way I can see it each repo is actually stored in CVS as a module and
then the supfiles checkout the contents of that module as desired - is
that correct?
I now have access to whole CVS root so I can add as many
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi
> new kernel 2.6.14 went up to testing, some major arch changes were done with
> this release.
> This kernel replaces the -scsi kernel and introduces full initrd support.
> That means that ALL of YOU out there need to modify your bootloaders to use
> the initrd, els
On Sunday 30 October 2005 11:02, Joe Giles wrote:
> On Sunday 30 October 2005 01:37, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hi
> > new kernel 2.6.14 went up to testing, some major arch changes were done
with
> > this release.
> > This kernel replaces the -scsi kernel and introduces full initrd support.
>
Sorry for my previous answer, I didn't see your last message.
2005/10/30, Mark Rosenstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Err, of course I meant the filesystem containing the modules,
> i.e. /lib.
That would be the initrd filesystem which is ext2, the only one that
would be supported by the kernel.
--
Ja
2005/10/30, Mark Rosenstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Because that would make it impossible to use anything but ext2 for the
> filesystem containing your kernel.
I disagree. It's bootloader's problem how to handle the filesystem
containing the kernel.
> I know some (most?) people use a
> seperate /b
Le Sunday 30 October 2005 18:54, eliott a écrit :
| I am curious why arch is moving to using initrd anyway. Does anyone
| know?
to have one kernel instead of a ide and a scsi one. (and to stop confuse
sata people with it ;-)
- D
--
Keep it right when you make it faster.
- The Ele
On Sunday 30 October 2005 01:37, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi
> new kernel 2.6.14 went up to testing, some major arch changes were done with
> this release.
> This kernel replaces the -scsi kernel and introduces full initrd support.
> That means that ALL of YOU out there need to modify your boot
Filesystems as modules. ick.
I am curious why arch is moving to using initrd anyway. Does anyone know?
~~~ Rohan ~~~ said:
> Thats exactly what slackware does. Not a bad idea, IMO.
>
> Rohan.
>
> On 30/10/05, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Great job! Why don't you build al
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:49:42 +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:12:09 +0100, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote:
> > Great job! Why don't you build also filesystems (except ext2 and
> > "pseudo filesystems") as modules.
>
> Because that would make it impossible to use anything but ext
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:12:09 +0100, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote:
> Great job! Why don't you build also filesystems (except ext2 and
> "pseudo filesystems") as modules.
Because that would make it impossible to use anything but ext2 for the
filesystem containing your kernel. I know some (most?) peop
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:47:51 -0500, Simo Leone wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:54:14AM +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> > Hey guys :)
> >
> > Would somebody mind explaining the purpose of the /opt prefixing in
> > many Arch packages?
> >
> > I'm just wondering as it's starting to get a bit unh
Hi --
X doesn't seem to like my PS/2 optical mouse. When using it, it
appears to generate spurious characters at the input so that the
cursor movement is real jerky and strange commands get sent to
terminal windows, etc. X seems to like an ordinary PS/2 roller-ball
mouse just fine. When I run F
HALLO!?
If they are phrakture's scripts they are obsolete! The standard scipts
now have full wireless support and will shortly even included WPA support.
Paul Hoy wrote:
>Hi Georg,
>
>Would you be able to post your corrections -- and perhaps your entire
>script -- on the wiki. I was never able
I would just like to show my support for a 0.7.1 or 0.8 updated iso.
There have been quite a few changes since 0.7 which justify a new
version so new Archers aren't confused, imo. A minimal FTP install iso
or floppies would also be nice. No need to download even the base iso
if you're just going to
Hi Georg,
Would you be able to post your corrections -- and perhaps your entire
script -- on the wiki. I was never able to get the profiles to work, nor
could I enable wpa, etc.
Thanks,
Paul
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 13:21 +, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:
> Is this regarding the official wirel
comp.lang.c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c
comp.lang.c++ for c++ :P
On 10/30/05, 赵光 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i want to get some good mail-list about c ,who can tell me,
> thx
>
> ___
> arch mailing list
> arch@archlinux.org
> http://www
Thats exactly what slackware does. Not a bad idea, IMO.
Rohan.On 30/10/05, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great job! Why don't you build also filesystems (except ext2 and"pseudo filesystems") as modules.--Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.archlinux.org | www.juvepolan
Great job! Why don't you build also filesystems (except ext2 and
"pseudo filesystems") as modules.
--
Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.archlinux.org | www.juvepoland.com
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.org/mail
Simo Leone wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:06:51AM -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote:
>
>
>>On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>With the exception of one package improperly installed the last time I
>>>tried it; the ftp install will get you the very latest packag
i want to get some good mail-list about c ,who can tell me,
thx
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Is this regarding the official wireless support or phraks ancient efforts?
Georg Grabler wrote:
>I've lately looked up the wireless scripts again.
>
>Though, there are still a couple of errors in the scripts, but anyway, as i
>got my version working a lot of others did i guess.
>
>I've found ano
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:06:51AM -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote:
>> On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > With the exception of one package improperly installed the last time
>> I tried it; the ftp install will get you the very latest packages
>> without having to install
Hi
new kernel 2.6.14 went up to testing, some major arch changes were done with
this release.
This kernel replaces the -scsi kernel and introduces full initrd support.
That means that ALL of YOU out there need to modify your bootloaders to use
the initrd, else you run into a kernel panic. Would
On Sunday 30 October 2005 07:39, Attila wrote:
> Am Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 23:59 hackte j l in die Tastatur:
> > What is urgent is a 7.1 base CD, with a 2.6.13 or 14
> > kernel because 7.0 talks about devfs, and that makes
> > roadkill easy with the upgrade that follows. It will
> > be a lot bet
Am Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 23:59 hackte j l in die Tastatur:
> What is urgent is a 7.1 base CD, with a 2.6.13 or 14
> kernel because 7.0 talks about devfs, and that makes
> roadkill easy with the upgrade that follows. It will
> be a lot better for new to Archers if there is a 7.1
> base CD witho
47 matches
Mail list logo
