[arch] What about pacnew files?

Hi all, I'm using archlinux a couple of months now and I'm pretty happy with it. It is simple, the community is very friendly and pacman is even better than apt-get. Arch Linux is my destop distro of choice. Very good work! Yesterday I did a pacman -Syu to upgrade my system. This worked fine.

Re: [arch] Wireless rt2500 problems

Boy do I feel silly.So I remembered ... that I have the arch default firewall which doesn't allow access to anything but eth0.And indeed: /etc/rc.d/iptables stopfollowed by[EMAIL PROTECTED] perun]# iwlist ra0 scan ra0   Scan completed :  Cell 01 - Address: 00:16:B6:02:EF:73 

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch Linux 0.8 WeAreReallyExceedingOurselvesHere :D ;) Rohan. -- Rohan Dhruva Proud GNU/Linux user. Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" http://www.dhruva.be/ ___

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

I'm guessing that no one will get this... Arch Linux 0.8 - Tenafly Viper "More Please!" -- Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy. --Spider Robinson ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch Linux 0.8 "Simplify"On 5/17/06, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Those popped into my head:Arch Linux 0.8 "Offense"Arch Linux 0.8 "Virgin"Arch Linux 0.8 "Apple Premium"Arch Linux 0.8 "Warlord"Arch Linux 0.8 "Teatime" Arch Linux 0.8 "Towel"and my favorite:Arch Linux 0.8 "Raxacoricofall

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Those popped into my head: Arch Linux 0.8 "Offense" Arch Linux 0.8 "Virgin" Arch Linux 0.8 "Apple Premium" Arch Linux 0.8 "Warlord" Arch Linux 0.8 "Teatime" Arch Linux 0.8 "Towel" and my favorite: Arch Linux 0.8 "Raxacoricofallapotorius" ___ arch mail

Re: [arch] i18n packages

Douglas Andrade schrieb: > Hey Thomas, > > If you can, please add pt_br too. I maintaining it in unsupported (AUR) > so it would be great to have it in community. Looks like firefox i18n-packages are coming quickly now. As I said before, I'll have a look at the votes. I might as well adopt them

[arch] amarok 1.4.0 - fast forward

Important changes in amarok 1.4.0: * amarok-engine now exists as virtual dependency that is provided by any amarok-engine-XXX pkg * amarok-engine-arts has become obsolete - RIP * amarok-engine-gst is under heavy developement and not available for 1.4.0 - it will be probably back in 1.4.1 * am

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch Linux 0.8 Butterfly Arch Linux 0.8 Dragon Arch Linux 0.8 Bulldog On 5/17/06, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wednesday 17 May 2006 11:54, Víctor wrote: > | Arch Linux 0.8 "Octopus" > > Arch Linux 0.8 Octopussy > > - D > > -- > (1) Everything depends. > (2) Nothing is always. > (3)

Re: [arch] i18n packages

Hey Thomas,If you can, please add pt_br too. I maintaining it in unsupported (AUR) so it would be great to have it in community.TIAOn 5/17/06, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mac!eKs schrieb:> Why the mozilla-firefox-de and -pt_br packages are in> unsupported :: network and not in unsupp

Re: [arch] Maple 9 installation fails; advice needed

On 17/05/06, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It installs in /opt/gcc2 anyway, so no conflicts with the other gcc. You may have to add/opt/gcc2/lib to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH or symlink the lib to /usr/lib, I'm not sure if I took care ofthat. Thomas, your gcc2 package has done the trick.  You

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Wednesday 17 May 2006 11:54, Víctor wrote: | Arch Linux 0.8 "Octopus" Arch Linux 0.8 Octopussy - D -- (1) Everything depends. (2) Nothing is always. (3) Everything is sometimes. pgp80EEHgbAx5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ arch mailing list arc

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Wednesday 17 May 2006 03:21, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: | Let the name thinking start! ArchLinux 0.8 Tamifly - D -- Moderation in all things. -- Publius Terentius Afer [Terence] pgpCasyjCyJIl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ arch mai

Re: [arch] i18n packages

Mac!eKs schrieb: > Why the mozilla-firefox-de and -pt_br packages are in > unsupported :: network and not in unsupported :: i18n ? > I added a new AUR package mozilla-firefox-pl and put it in i18n. I'd like to put some of those language packages in community, so please encourage people to vote o

Re: [arch] mysql security bug

Mysql 5.0.20a does not address this security issue: these vulnerabilities were not addressed until about two weeks after the 5.0.20a release. http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/news-5-0-21.html I hope this helps. -James .:: On 05/17/2006 03:13 PM - Judd Vinet wrote ::. > On Wed, May 17, 20

Re: [arch] Why does pacman want to "upgrade" my version of wine to an older version?

On Wednesday 17 May 2006 10:09 pm, Thomas Bächler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > There is no explanation for 0.9.13 though, but I assume it's the same > > issue "reason". > > I just assume that the maintainer didn't have time to build 0.9.13 yet, but > I can't know that for sure. You will

[arch] Request for info: how to find /arch/setup

Hello,I am new to Arch Linux and I hope this is not a FAQ answered again and again. BTW, Arch Linux is just fantastic!My question is: can I find the setup program that is run during the CD installation anywhere on the internet? Somewhere in the CVS tree maybe? I would like to look up some details e

Re: [arch] mysql security bug

Hussam Al-Tayeb schrieb: > I came across this today > http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1516 > It says all versions up to 5.0.20 as vulnerable. > Is archlinux's mysql affected? > If yes, can we get an update to 5.0.21? > Somebody on the #mysql channel said 5.0.21 fixes

Re: [arch] mysql security bug

I'm not sure if this is helpful or not, but I posted a bug for this, in hopes of trying to get the Arch Linux Security Team up and running. It can be found here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4589 -James .:: On 05/17/2006 03:13 PM - Judd Vinet wrote ::. > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:09:18PM +03

Re: [arch] mysql security bug

On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:09:18PM +0300, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > I came across this today > http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1516 > It says all versions up to 5.0.20 as vulnerable. > Is archlinux's mysql affected? Probably not, then. We're on mysql 5.0.20a. > If ye

Re: [arch] Nice new Arch review at NewsForge

David Rosenstrauch schrieb: > http://os.newsforge.com/os/06/05/05/2138228.shtml The article has also been discussed here: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=21494 ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/a

[arch] mysql security bug

I came across this today http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1516 It says all versions up to 5.0.20 as vulnerable. Is archlinux's mysql affected? If yes, can we get an update to 5.0.21? Somebody on the #mysql channel said 5.0.21 fixes this. pgpg2b4qF9hsh.pgp Description

Re: [arch] Why does pacman want to "upgrade" my version of wine to an older version?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > There is no explanation for 0.9.13 though, but I assume it's the same issue > "reason". I just assume that the maintainer didn't have time to build 0.9.13 yet, but I can't know that for sure. You will see if we will have 0.9.13 soon. _

Re: [arch] Maple 9 installation fails; advice needed

Francois schrieb: > It's release 9.01. > > I'm a little wary about changing gcc around for this because I'm not > sure what I'm doing. Would it be enough merely to build it and then > plop the library in /usr/lib, without 'installing' it? > > Maybe it's time I bought Maple 10 anyway! ;) It inst

Re: [arch] Arch Current and SiS video

I noticed the What's New stuff for xscreensaver here: http://tinyurl.com/jjjw3 The relevant fix that caught my eye was this, for 4.24 (Feb 8, 2006): Backed out a DPMS-related patch that cause desktop flickering with some X servers. Douglas Andrade wrote: > Interesting, i would never guess by y

Re: [arch] Arch Current and SiS video

unfortunately I didn't read this thread earlier... a friend of mine had the same problems under Gentoo a while ago... 2006/5/17, Douglas Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Interesting, i would never guess by your description that it was a > xscreensaver problem. > Great that it is solved. > > > On 5

Re: [arch] Arch Current and SiS video

Interesting, i would never guess by your description that it was a xscreensaver problem.Great that it is solved.On 5/17/06, Ralph Alvy < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Ralph Alvy wrote:> I notice that, unlike other Linux installations I have, Arch Current > flickers quite a lot on my new SiS 661 onboard

Re: [arch] Arch Current and SiS video

Ralph Alvy wrote: > I notice that, unlike other Linux installations I have, Arch Current > flickers quite a lot on my new SiS 661 onboard video box. I'm not sure how > to fix this. I have exactly the same xorg settings (as far as I can tell) > that are in place with my other Linux installations on

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Oh, Come on! I really think that "Smelly Bulldog" would be a great name for a distro ... (I couldn't help myself, sorry) 2006/5/17, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Some of the names proposed seems to have been influenced by the Ubuntu > naming conventions. I think we should stick to our own

Re: [arch] Maple 9 installation fails; advice needed

On 16/05/06, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I could install maple without such problems, in fact without any problems at all. What version doyou have exactly?It's release 9.01.I'm a little wary about changing gcc around for this because I'm not sure what I'm doing.  Would it be enough me

Re: [arch] Nice new Arch review at NewsForge

David Rosenstrauch wrote: > http://os.newsforge.com/os/06/05/05/2138228.shtml > > DR > > ___ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > That was a great article... Good publicity as well... Arch simply

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

A blatant rip from Intel's page book: Octium :-) DR ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

[arch] Nice new Arch review at NewsForge

http://os.newsforge.com/os/06/05/05/2138228.shtml DR ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gan lu wrote: > ArchLinux 0.8 "micro$oft" > Arch Linux 0.8 (MicroNot) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEaysEbCTovVQY/AMRAvUuAKCo3UVx8rvTjSaA6rnC83

Re: [arch] Why does pacman want to "upgrade" my version of wine to an older version?

I say instead of using wine, contact the author of the program you run under wine and ask them to port it to linux. pgpzRWihblJHf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

What about Arch Linux 0.8 (Spammy) ? ;-)) :P -- Stavros Giannouris Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Hello. I'm a signature virus. Just copy me to your signature to help me spread" signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch] i18n packages

i18n category. On 5/17/06, Douglas Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im going to do so, i fact i did not saw the i18n package when i put it > there. > > Thanks for pointing that. > > On 5/17/06, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2006 11:00 schrieb Mac!eKs: > > >

Re: [arch] i18n packages

Im going to do so, i fact i did not saw the i18n package when i put it there. Thanks for pointing that. On 5/17/06, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2006 11:00 schrieb Mac!eKs: > > Hi > > Why the mozilla-firefox-de and -pt_br packages are in > > unsupported :: netw

Re: [arch] General Discusson about Arch Linux

Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > On 5/17/06, *Joeri Vlekken* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > some suggestions of my side: > > > > Arch Linux 0.8 "Zion" > > Arch Linux 0.8 "Luca" > > Arch Linux 0.8 "Cyan" > > Arch Linux 0.8 "Adelpha" > > Arch Linux 0.8 "

Re: [arch] Why does pacman want to "upgrade" my version of wine to an older version?

On 5/17/06, Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:57:14 +0200, Thomas Bächler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > >> > >>> buuut, i just changed the pkgver and removed the md5sums from the > >>> pkgbuild > >>> in

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch Linux 0.8 (Doors) Arch Linux 0.8 (Walls) Arch Linux 0.8 (Windows) Arch Linux 0.8 (Roofs) Arch Linux 0.8 (Gates) Arch Linux 0.8 (Fences) Arch Linux 0.8 (Flower) Arch Linux 0.8 (Plant) Arch Linux 0.8 (Cactus) Arch Linux 0.8 (Tree) Arch Linux 0.8 (Bush) Arch Linux 0.8 (Mushroom) Arch Linux 0.8

Re: [arch] General Discusson about Arch Linux

On 17/05/06, Matthew Gyurgyik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/17/06, Joeri Vlekken <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: some suggestions of my side:> Arch Linux 0.8 "Zion"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Luca"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Cyan"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Adelpha"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Delta"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Delphi"> Arch Linux

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Pierre Schmitz wrote: > These days everybody is crazy about the WM (soccer) in Germany this year. So > what about "Fußball" or just "Tor!". :-) Ok, I'm german - but I dislike any soccerrelated stuff. -- Gruß, Johannes www.hehejo.de ___ arch mailing li

Re: [arch] Why does pacman want to "upgrade" my version of wine to an older version?

On Wed, 17 May 2006 13:54:21 +0200, Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:57:14 +0200, Thomas Bächler >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >>> buuut, i just changed the pkgver and removed the md5sums from the p

Re: [arch] Why does pacman want to "upgrade" my version of wine to an older version?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:57:14 +0200, Thomas Bächler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> >>> buuut, i just changed the pkgver and removed the md5sums from the >>> pkgbuild >>> in abs and built from that one, so my wine 0.9.13 which

Re: [arch] Why does pacman want to "upgrade" my version of wine to an older version?

On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:57:14 +0200, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> buuut, i just changed the pkgver and removed the md5sums from the >> pkgbuild >> in abs and built from that one, so my wine 0.9.13 which has the force >> flag >> sat to 'y' still sho

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

ArchLinux 0.8 "micro$oft" On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 22:42 -0400, Slash wrote: > Arch Linux 0.8 "BladeRunner" > > On 5/16/06, Alexandre Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > NOW THAT would grant you, sir, a +1 funny if this was slashdot! > > > > 2006/5/16, Martin Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Víctor escribió: > ... > Arch Linux 0.8 "Octopus" > "Octopus" is my choice -- Felipe Gordillo __ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com __

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Ryan wrote: > Arch Linux 0.8 (2.0) ...my absolute favourite atm.. :D ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Vesuvius Geoff ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch Linux 0.8 - One Pacman to rule them all. - Arjan Timmerman ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] General Discusson about Arch Linux

On 5/17/06, Joeri Vlekken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: some suggestions of my side:> Arch Linux 0.8 "Zion"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Luca"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Cyan"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Adelpha"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Delta"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Delphi"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Corneria"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Delta"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Yeta

[arch] General Discusson about Arch Linux

some suggestions of my side: > Arch Linux 0.8 "Zion" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Luca" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Cyan" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Adelpha" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Delta" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Delphi" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Corneria" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Delta" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Yeta" > Arch Linux 0.8 "Toei" > Arch Linux 0.8

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Víctor wrote: > Arch Linux 0.8 "DaVinci" "DaVinciCode"? :-P --vk ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

These days everybody is crazy about the WM (soccer) in Germany this year. So what about "Fußball" or just "Tor!". :-) ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Ryan wrote: > Arch Linux 0.8 (Jalapeno) Sounds like it's hot. Like that much.. -- Gruß, Johannes www.hehejo.de ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch Linux 0.8 "DaVinci" Arch Linux 0.8 "Glory" Arch Linux 0.8 "Octopus" On 5/17/06, Stefano Z. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello. > > Arch Linux 0.8 "Noe'" > > http://www.newadvent.org/bible/gen007.htm > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version:

Re: [arch] i18n packages

Am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2006 11:00 schrieb Mac!eKs: > Hi > Why the mozilla-firefox-de and -pt_br packages are in > unsupported :: network and not in unsupported :: i18n ? > I added a new AUR package mozilla-firefox-pl and put it in i18n. Well, I think you are right. So I moved my packages. I did not

Re: [arch] i18n packages

Hi Why the mozilla-firefox-de and -pt_br packages are in unsupported :: network and not in unsupported :: i18n ? I added a new AUR package mozilla-firefox-pl and put it in i18n. -- Mac!eKs ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. Arch Linux 0.8 "Noe'" http://www.newadvent.org/bible/gen007.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEaty7+uTW0044ZKIRArGyAJ9iYUE3F0lpSUYoZBuAA

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > This is split from - [arch] when will 0.7.2 be out? > Let the name thinking start! > Arch Linux 0.8 (Sally) Arch Linux 0.8 (Luna) Arch Linux 0.8 (Lilly) Arch Linux 0.8 (Ralph) Arch Linux 0.8 (Mojo) Arch Linux 0.8 (Mustafa) A

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 21:21 -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > This is split from - [arch] when will 0.7.2 be out? > Let the name thinking start! Archlinux 0.8: "Works for me" Archlinux 0.8: "Not a bug" or whatever bug closing message you could think of ;) ___

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch 0.8 CrossTheBridgeWhenWeComeToIt ? But i think it's too long, would mess up the vt output (ctrl-alt-fX) :DD Rohan. -- Rohan Dhruva Proud GNU/Linux user. Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" http://www.d

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

Arch 0.8 Schebang! On 5/17/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/17/06, Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > How about" > > > > Arch Linux 0.8 (Beyond) after my fav kernel :) > > > > Joe > > > > I'm fine by that ;) > > -- > iphitus - Beyond Maintainer, Arch Trusted User, Arch Develop

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

On 5/17/06, Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How about" > > Arch Linux 0.8 (Beyond) after my fav kernel :) > > Joe > I'm fine by that ;) -- iphitus - Beyond Maintainer, Arch Trusted User, Arch Developer. Home:iphitus.loudas.com ___ arch mailin

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

I'm becoming famous among my friends as being the 'conversation killer'. Let's see how well I do here: Arch Linux 0.8 (0.8) Arch Linux 0.8 (ought eight) Arch Linux 0.8 (Waldo) Arch Linux 0.8 (Danger) Arch Linux 0.8 (A+) Arch Linux 0.8 (Crux++) Arch Linux 0.8 (Jalapeno) Arch Linux 0.8 (Woot!) Arc

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:50:08AM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: > Some of the names proposed seems to have been influenced by the Ubuntu > naming conventions. I think we should stick to our own conventions - one > word codenames, conveying something meaningful. > > Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > > A