Re: [arch] why still amarok-base

2007-01-14 Thread Vladimir Koshelenko
В сообщении от 13 января 2007 21:34 Damir Perisa написал(a): > the amarok-base is called base, because it has no engines inside. you > have to install at least one amarok-engine to make it play music. Maybe, it will useful to make megapackage 'amarok' as megapackages 'xorg' or 'kde'? ___

[arch] Arch CD creation.

2007-01-14 Thread Samuel Mathieson
Id like to create an up-to-date version of Arch64, is there a script somewhere I might use to download the packages needed and create the CD? Thanks, Sam. ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] GKrellM and internet

2007-01-14 Thread Kurt B Cox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Gananathan wrote: > So I have a bit of a problem, I am a laptop user and I recently went > and took the network daemon off the bootup list, because it annoys me > when it waits and trys to connect when I have no cable plugged in. But > then GKr

Re: [arch] why still amarok-base

2007-01-14 Thread Damir Perisa
Sunday 14 January 2007 09:02, Guillermo A. Amaral wrote: | Sweet, sorry about that mate, i did try it but i had to rebuild in | order to use it on my machine a while back. yes, this was 1.4.3 since 1.4.4 it is now all a lot easier: http://www.archlinux.org/news/277/ - D -- dcop amarok playe

Re: [arch] why still amarok-base

2007-01-14 Thread Guillermo A. Amaral
On Saturday 13 January 2007 22:12, Damir Perisa wrote: > Saturday 13 January 2007 19:24, Guillermo A. Amaral wrote: > | Last time i checked the amarok-base in the extras repo DOES have > | mysql enabled, but since not many people have those libraries or > | want mysql its not build in by default