On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Jan de Groot wrote:
> The ABI changed, not the API. The -sharp bindings should build fine, and
> as the -sharp bindings itself aren't touched for the rest. Applications
> should still run fine, as they depend on some dll in the global assembly
> cache in the right location.
I
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 21:14 +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote:
> It is nice to see some action finally. :) Although I have to ask: are
> you sure that this is the right decision? Will the old gnome-terminal
> still work with the other libs? For me, it is a very important app and
> I can absolutely not
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:12 -0700, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Jan de Groot wrote:
> this will break most of the stuff depending on gtk-sharp, gtk-sharp-2,
> right. A whole bunch of mono rebuilds coming up?
>
> -neri
>
The ABI changed, not the API. The -sharp bindings sh
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:46 +0300, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> I know gnome-power-manager is a bit buggy but what's wrong with vte?
VTE displays double-sized cursors in my terminals, fucks up the cursor
completely in vim on remote debian boxes and that's about it. The SVN
changelog for VTE is very ac
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Jan de Groot wrote:
> GNOME 2.18 has been in testing for a while now. Besides the bugs I know
> of, I haven't seen any issues with it. There's rebuilds for gtkhtml
> left, as they bumped ABI. These packages will get a rebuild before
> taking other actions now.
this will break
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:13 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> GNOME 2.18 has been in testing for a while now. Besides the bugs I know
> of, I haven't seen any issues with it. There's rebuilds for gtkhtml
> left, as they bumped ABI. These packages will get a rebuild before
> taking other actions now.
> T
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:13:31PM +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> GNOME 2.18 has been in testing for a while now. Besides the bugs I know
> of, I haven't seen any issues with it. There's rebuilds for gtkhtml
> left, as they bumped ABI. These packages will get a rebuild before
> taking other actions n
GNOME 2.18 has been in testing for a while now. Besides the bugs I know
of, I haven't seen any issues with it. There's rebuilds for gtkhtml
left, as they bumped ABI. These packages will get a rebuild before
taking other actions now.
To speed up the move process, I will move in GNOME 2.18 to extra t
On 3/29/07, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/29, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2007/2/24, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > A security policy in place prevents this sender from sending this
> message to
> > > this recipient, see message bus configuration file (rejected me
30.03.07, Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > В сообщении от 30 марта 2007 Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho написал(a):
> > > > I'd like to add the '\r' param into /etc/issue file, like this:
> > > >
> > > > Arch Linux 0.8 (Voodoo) (\n) (Kernel \r) (\l)
> > > >
> > > > I think i
> > В сообщении от 30 марта 2007 Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho написал(a):
> > > I'd like to add the '\r' param into /etc/issue file, like this:
> > >
> > > Arch Linux 0.8 (Voodoo) (\n) (Kernel \r) (\l)
> > >
> > > I think it is important to show the kernel version on the shell.
> > >
> > > What
11 matches
Mail list logo
