Many thanks, much appreciated.
Richard
On Friday 18 May 2007 08:15, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Richard Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't seem to get Parallels to run on the newest kernel.
> >
> > Where can one find old kernel packages/headers to allow downgrading?
>
> http://wi
On 5/17/07, Richard Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't seem to get Parallels to run on the newest kernel.
>
> Where can one find old kernel packages/headers to allow downgrading?
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Downgrade_packages
http://phraktured.net/archmirror/
_
I can't seem to get Parallels to run on the newest kernel.
Where can one find old kernel packages/headers to allow downgrading?
Regards
Richard
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I
> noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but
> they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other
> language bindings be a
Selon Dale Blount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Yes, I do agree. kernel-laptop -desktop -sever if you want my vote. BTW,
> Since we haven't supported 2.4 for a long time, why not remove 26 from the
> name?
>
> So when kernel 2.8 comes out, we don't have to rename it back to
> kernel26.
>
Thank you D
On Thursday 17 May 2007, Stefano Z. wrote:
> Hello
>
> it seems that udev and or kernel doesn't create devices
> like /dev/rfcommX even if there is the correct
> /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf file.
I noticed the same problem also. I remember having this set up automatically
using arch.
Damnshock
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I
>> noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but
>> they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will
Hello
it seems that udev and or kernel doesn't create devices
like /dev/rfcommX even if there is the correct
/etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf file.
bug ?
Thanks !
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I
> noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but
> they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other
> language bindings be a
2007/5/17, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I
> noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but
> they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other
> language bindings be accepted
I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I
noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but
they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other
language bindings be accepted in the main source tree?
__
--- Gan Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, Since we haven't supported
> 2.4 for a long time, why not remove 26 from the
> name?
That was the setup in the pre Arch 0.6 era. I don't
see why we would need to change it again because
whenever a new kernel branch would be introduced, the
cycle wou
Hi Archlinux Community,
17th May, 16:10 CEST (Central European Summer Time)
it's done final 2007.05 Duke ISOs for i686 and x86_64 are ready :)
Get Archlinux ISOs in /iso/2007.05/{i686,x86_64} on your favorite mirror.
Download_Wiki:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mirrors
or
Download_Homepage:
> Yes, I do agree. kernel-laptop -desktop -sever if you want my vote. BTW,
> Since we haven't supported 2.4 for a long time, why not remove 26 from the
> name?
So when kernel 2.8 comes out, we don't have to rename it back to
kernel26.
Dale
___
arc
On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:12:06 +0200
Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 21:17 waldek wrote:
>
> > Let me explain then, I thought it was obvious :-)
> > How does it compare to booting another kernel and downgrading the broken
> > one? I don't even want to mention my dell n
On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 21:17 waldek wrote:
> Let me explain then, I thought it was obvious :-)
> How does it compare to booting another kernel and downgrading the broken
> one? I don't even want to mention my dell notebook with external cd drive I
> can never find.
> IMO having two kernels is a
16 matches
Mail list logo