Re: [arch] Where to find old kernel packages

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Terry
Many thanks, much appreciated. Richard On Friday 18 May 2007 08:15, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On 5/17/07, Richard Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't seem to get Parallels to run on the newest kernel. > > > > Where can one find old kernel packages/headers to allow downgrading? > > http://wi

Re: [arch] Where to find old kernel packages

2007-05-17 Thread Aaron Griffin
On 5/17/07, Richard Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't seem to get Parallels to run on the newest kernel. > > Where can one find old kernel packages/headers to allow downgrading? http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Downgrade_packages http://phraktured.net/archmirror/ _

[arch] Where to find old kernel packages

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Terry
I can't seem to get Parallels to run on the newest kernel. Where can one find old kernel packages/headers to allow downgrading? Regards Richard ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] ALPM bindings

2007-05-17 Thread Joao Estevao
On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I > noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but > they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other > language bindings be a

Re: [arch] Arch Kernels

2007-05-17 Thread kozaki . dev
Selon Dale Blount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, I do agree. kernel-laptop -desktop -sever if you want my vote. BTW, > Since we haven't supported 2.4 for a long time, why not remove 26 from the > name? > > So when kernel 2.8 comes out, we don't have to rename it back to > kernel26. > Thank you D

Re: [arch] rfcomm

2007-05-17 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Thursday 17 May 2007, Stefano Z. wrote: > Hello > > it seems that udev and or kernel doesn't create devices > like /dev/rfcommX even if there is the correct > /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf file. I noticed the same problem also. I remember having this set up automatically using arch. Damnshock

Re: [arch] ALPM bindings

2007-05-17 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Aaron Griffin wrote: > On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I >> noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but >> they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will

[arch] rfcomm

2007-05-17 Thread Stefano Z.
Hello it seems that udev and or kernel doesn't create devices like /dev/rfcommX even if there is the correct /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf file. bug ? Thanks ! ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] ALPM bindings

2007-05-17 Thread Aaron Griffin
On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I > noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but > they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other > language bindings be a

Re: [arch] ALPM bindings

2007-05-17 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2007/5/17, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I > noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but > they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other > language bindings be accepted

[arch] ALPM bindings

2007-05-17 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other language bindings be accepted in the main source tree? __

Re: [arch] Arch Kernels

2007-05-17 Thread Jon B
--- Gan Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, Since we haven't supported > 2.4 for a long time, why not remove 26 from the > name? That was the setup in the pre Arch 0.6 era. I don't see why we would need to change it again because whenever a new kernel branch would be introduced, the cycle wou

[arch] 2007.05 Duke ISOs released

2007-05-17 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi Archlinux Community, 17th May, 16:10 CEST (Central European Summer Time) it's done final 2007.05 Duke ISOs for i686 and x86_64 are ready :) Get Archlinux ISOs in /iso/2007.05/{i686,x86_64} on your favorite mirror. Download_Wiki: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mirrors or Download_Homepage:

Re: [arch] Arch Kernels

2007-05-17 Thread Dale Blount
> Yes, I do agree. kernel-laptop -desktop -sever if you want my vote. BTW, > Since we haven't supported 2.4 for a long time, why not remove 26 from the > name? So when kernel 2.8 comes out, we don't have to rename it back to kernel26. Dale ___ arc

Re: [arch] Arch Kernels

2007-05-17 Thread Gan Lu
On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:12:06 +0200 Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 21:17 waldek wrote: > > > Let me explain then, I thought it was obvious :-) > > How does it compare to booting another kernel and downgrading the broken > > one? I don't even want to mention my dell n

Re: [arch] Arch Kernels

2007-05-17 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 21:17 waldek wrote: > Let me explain then, I thought it was obvious :-) > How does it compare to booting another kernel and downgrading the broken > one? I don't even want to mention my dell notebook with external cd drive I > can never find. > IMO having two kernels is a