On 5/19/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please someone with access to website change
> Releases
> 2007.05 Duke pending
> to
> 2007.05 Duke 2007-05-17
> :-D
Fixed it temporarily, this still needs some pkglist files, like the
other releases, and needs to be checked into CVS (/me look
2007/5/20, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arch Linux Security Warning ALSW 2007-#32
>
JJ, just to inform you, but i think something went wrong with your
script/e-mail markup;
using gmail i see a couple lines with =3d (uppercase) inst
On Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 09:59 Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote:
>> ABS is there for you, just add reiser4 to kernel26.
>
> Ok, you are the developers but I would prefer to hear your reasons.
I'm not a dev but from my view it doesn't make sense that because if the devs
don't use reiser4 than they can
Arch Linux Security Warning ALSW 2007-#32
Name: libpng
Date: 2007-05-20
Severity: High
Warning #: 2007-#32
Product Background
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
2007/5/20, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't worry about the reiser4progs, they're just some tools just like
> e2fsprogs and xfsprogs. What worries me more is grub. When I tried
> reiser4 a long while ago, the grub patch didn't apply on our version of
> grub.
I've just tried and the patc
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 22:40 +0200, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this was discussed before (I mean recently, it
> might have been brought up a long time ago but a lot has changed
> since).
>
> Althought reiser4 still has not accepted by Linus, it seems it's
> fairly stable an
2007/5/20, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 04:35:56PM -0700, eliott wrote:
> >
> > My opinion is: I think it is a bad idea to include reiser4 in the base
> > kernel.
> >
> ditto.
>
> ABS is there for you, just add reiser4 to kernel26.
Ok, you are the developers but I w
Arch Linux Security Warning ALSW 2007-#31
Name: samba
Date: 2007-05-17
Severity: High
Warning #: 2007-#31
Product
