On Tuesday 12 June 2007, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> - kbluetooth works as a PIN helper compatible with bluez 3.x dbus interface
Finally!
Thank you very much!
Damnshock
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
arch mailing
Le Tuesday 12 June 2007 18:42:27 Thomas Bächler, vous avez écrit :
> I updated kdebluetooth to 1.0-beta3. The most important changes are:
>
> - kbluetoothd has been replaced by kbluetooth, which is only an applet now
> - kbluetooth works as a PIN helper compatible with bluez 3.x dbus interface
> -
I updated kdebluetooth to 1.0-beta3. The most important changes are:
- kbluetoothd has been replaced by kbluetooth, which is only an applet now
- kbluetooth works as a PIN helper compatible with bluez 3.x dbus interface
- the obex file transfer ioslave has been rewritten
- the obex push client/ser
On Tuesday 12 Jun 2007 8:59:07 pm domanov wrote:
> > > Now my question, maybe there are other people who has the same
> > > problem, so i would burn this repositories maybe twice a month on dvd
> > > and send it to those people. For a small amount.
>
> You are not selling gpl-ed code binaries, you
On 6/12/07, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the last episode, (On Tuesday 26 Sivan 5767 16:04:13), Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
> > It is not an issue of license costs. IIRC, you are not allowed to let
> > people pay for GPL software. You can sell the material and documentation
> > you wrote
> > Now my question, maybe there are other people who has the same
> > problem, so i would burn this repositories maybe twice a month on dvd
> > and send it to those people. For a small amount.
You are not selling gpl-ed code binaries, you are selling a service
(download+burn+shipping). As long as
In the last episode, (On Tuesday 26 Sivan 5767 16:04:13), Thomas Bächler
wrote:
> Jeff Mickey schrieb:
> > My understanding is that yes, under the GPL you are allowed to charge
> > for distribution of free software.
> >
> > I personally would consider it fraud if you did not obviously show
> > tha
Jeff Mickey schrieb:
> My understanding is that yes, under the GPL you are allowed to charge
> for distribution of free software.
>
> I personally would consider it fraud if you did not obviously show
> that you can acquire all of this for free on http://archlinux.org
> though. I really don't wan
On 6/12/07, Anton Achatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to use my archlinux at home i have to download the repositories
> custom, extra, communitiy ... at work, use an external hd-drive to
> bring this files home and install from external hd.
>
> Now my question, maybe there are other people who has
to use my archlinux at home i have to download the repositories
custom, extra, communitiy ... at work, use an external hd-drive to
bring this files home and install from external hd.
Now my question, maybe there are other people who has the same
problem, so i would burn this repositories maybe twi
hello,
i have only a small question. my favouri
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
11 matches
Mail list logo