Re: [arch] Problems with sudo

On 8/22/07, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed 2007-08-22 22:14 , Rodrigo Coacci wrote: > > I've just did an pacman -Syu and after that my sudo started giving the > > following message: > > > > sudo: /lib/libpam.so.0: no version information available (required by > sudo

Re: [arch] Problems with sudo

On Wed 2007-08-22 22:14 , Rodrigo Coacci wrote: > I've just did an pacman -Syu and after that my sudo started giving the > following message: > > sudo: /lib/libpam.so.0: no version information available (required by sudo) > > It happens in my girlfriend's machine too. Anyone confirms this? The i

[arch] Problems with sudo

I've just did an pacman -Syu and after that my sudo started giving the following message: sudo: /lib/libpam.so.0: no version information available (required by sudo) It happens in my girlfriend's machine too. Anyone confirms this? -- Cheers, Rodrigo A computer is like air conditioning: i

Re: [arch] dcraw in extra repo

On Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 18:35 waldek wrote: > And by the way why the package version is 1.392 instead of 8.77? The Revision number in http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/dcraw.c shows 1.392 ... so perhaps you have to ask the original author of the software why he offers two different numb

Re: [arch] booting with old kernels: Verdict

Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > Hello list, > > for testing purposes I need to boot my arch system using old versions of > linux. However, because of udev and libc, I doubt I'll be able to boot > old enough kernels. > > So what is the oldest kernel that should work out of the box with > current a

[arch] dcraw in extra repo

hi, I marked dcraw as outdated and I hope I'm right. The latest version is 8.77 and the one that is in the extra repo is 8.75, although the package itself was released 2 days ago. If one compiles the package from abs one gets two md5 checksum errors and after fixing them 8.77 is build. Should I ope

[arch] Arch at FrOSCon 2007 in St. Augustin

Hello arch community, The Department of Computer Science of the University of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg is organising a conference about Free Software and Open Source. The conference will take place on Saturday and Sunday at 25th and 26th of August. You are invited to meet us at a proj

Re: [arch] booting with old kernels

Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2007/8/22, Dimitrios Apostolou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> There are 2 issues that certainly affect the age of the kernel you can use: >> >> 1) glibc, mostly (only?) because of the linuxthreads to NPTL migration. >> You can't use glibc>2.3 without an NPTL supporting kernel, whic

Re: [arch] kernel26ck retirement

When you decide to remove kernel26ck from extra, I could take it into community once I'm active again (still not PC at home, only a Windows box at work). I bet there will be people who will not want to switch to CFS just yet, with me being most likely one of them. -- Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL

Re: [arch] booting with old kernels

Dimitrios Apostolou schrieb: > Another issue which I haven't yet found out why it happens is probably > the greatest obstacle. All binaries require at least kernel 2.6.6 to run: > > $ file /bin/bash > /bin/bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for > GNU/Linux 2.6.6, dyn

Re: [arch] booting with old kernels

2007/8/22, Dimitrios Apostolou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There are 2 issues that certainly affect the age of the kernel you can use: > > 1) glibc, mostly (only?) because of the linuxthreads to NPTL migration. > You can't use glibc>2.3 without an NPTL supporting kernel, which is > version 2.6. > 2) ude