Re: [arch] Alsaconf not working

ry, I missed that you had suggested commenting out the alsa entries as well. Everything is loading correctly now. See what happens when you admin a machine on little to no sleep?! Barton ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Alsaconf not working

80 hours in the last 7 days and am running on very little sleep. Attached is how they were when the module was not loading. Barton # # /etc/modprobe.conf (for v2.6 kernels) # # OSS Compatibility # install snd-pcm modprobe -i snd-pcm ; modprobe snd-pcm-oss ; true # install snd-seq modprobe -i sn

Re: [arch] Alsaconf not working

On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 08:32 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > could you attach your modprobe.conf? > thanks > greetings > tpowa Sure. /etc/modprobe.conf and /etc/rc.conf attached, the box is a HP XW6000. # # /etc/modprobe.conf (for v2.6 kernels) # # OSS Compatibility install snd-pcm modprobe

Re: [arch] Alsaconf not working

ine in rc.conf and life is good ;) Barton ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Alsaconf not working

In my case the module is snd_intel8x0 - yours will likely be different. Barton ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Clarification on How the Rolling Release System Works

On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:12:38AM +1300, Hadley Rich wrote: > On Saturday 19 November 2005 06:50, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > I just want to say that Arch also uses BSD-style init scripts which in > > > my opinion in not a bad thing at all... > > > > And slackware uses SysV initscripts - he just ha

Re: [arch] arch and info

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:18:46AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > IMHO it's too far-going conclusion. I think most people use Arch > > > despite the lack of info files. > > > > Yes, I agree. Most people use Arch in spite of the lack of info files, > > not because! > > How can either of

Re: [arch] OO2.org beta

On Sunday 05 June 2005 01:18 am, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2005 09:08 schrieb Barton Janes: > > Has the OO.org printer admin module been depricated in the OO2 beta? I > > installed it via the unstable repository, and it works marvelously well, > > with

[arch] OO2.org beta

Has the OO.org printer admin module been depricated in the OO2 beta? I installed it via the unstable repository, and it works marvelously well, with the exception of the printer admin module not being there. My printer is available and all the OO.org 2 apps print to it just fine, so it's not

[arch] Strange emails?

Has anyone other than me been receiving emails from an unknown sender with no subject or body dated Wed Dec 31 15:59:59 1969? I have received 40 of them now starting 4 days ago. -- Never mistake Education for Intelligence ___ arch mailing list arch@ar

Re: [arch] Re: Sound just died

You are a lifesaver Eric! Thank you very much for the link to the older package. Barton On Thursday 07 April 2005 09:51 pm, you wrote: > There an old package on this mirror: > http://ftp.nluug.nl/ftp/pub/os/Linux/distr/archlinux/current/o

Re: [arch] Re: Sound just died

=== > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Ralph Alvy wrote: > > Barton wrote: > > > I just updated 4 packages via pacman and sound just died on me. I > > > double checked all the settings, modules, scripts, nothing was changed > > > that I can find. The

[arch] Sound just died

not muted, correct modules loaded, alsaconfig reports sound card as responding, alsamixer shows volumes up and not muted, arts is set to use alsa, kde volumes all the way up. Sound has worked perfectly up to now... Barton -- Never mistake Education for Intelligence

[arch] Fwd: Sound just died

Oops - make that 6 packages! Sorry, my counting skills go away after 11:00 pm ;) Barton -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Sound just died Date: Wednesday 06 April 2005 11:46 pm From: Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arch@archlinux.org I just updated 4 packages via pacm

Re: [arch] Apache branding

I vote: Server: AOLServer 5.0 (AmigaDOS) On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:01 am, Tomasz Bakiera wrote: > >> Maybe this could confuse them more: > >> > >> Arch -> Server: Apache 1.0 (WindowsME) > > No, no, NI > > Server: Apache 2.0.53 (DOS) > or > Server: Apache 2.0.53 (OpenDOS) > > :-) > > -- > Tomasz

Re: [arch] can't mount audio cd

That is correct, you don't mount an audio CD to listen to it. The playback program just accesses the block device directly IIRC. On Saturday 02 April 2005 03:09 pm, Maksim Sipos wrote: > Umm, I believe you can't mount an audio CD (unless it's one of those > mixed audio and programs CDs)... Mou

Re: [arch] XFree86 removal

Pretty much everyone has switched over to x.org, IIRC debian is planning on moving eventually too, it's just going to take them a long time with their glacial release pattern :) Personally I haven't run XFree in a year or so, and I have an ATI card in a laptop. On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 09:40 +0100