Re: [arch] Arch Leadership

2007-10-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I'd like to thank Judd for all the amazing work that he had done to create Arch and to wish him the best of luck in his future endeavours. I'd also like to congratulate Aaron for his new appointment. I hope he will bring Arch to new heights. Best Regards, Bozhidar ___

Re: [arch] Emacs 22.1 generates 100% CPU load

2007-06-10 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Ryan Ply wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 11:59:45PM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: > >> Jürgen Hötzel wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:16:38AM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I have installed the new emac

Re: [arch] Emacs 22.1 generates 100% CPU load

2007-06-10 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Jürgen Hötzel wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:16:38AM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: > >> I have installed the new emacs 22.1-3 package recently and when I run >> emacs now I get a constant 100% CPU load. I looked at the forum - it >> seems that others are having

[arch] Emacs 22.1 generates 100% CPU load

2007-06-09 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I have installed the new emacs 22.1-3 package recently and when I run emacs now I get a constant 100% CPU load. I looked at the forum - it seems that others are having the same issue. It also says there that the 22.1-3 build should have fixed the issue though it doesn't fix it for me... Any id

Re: [arch] ALPM bindings

2007-05-17 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Aaron Griffin wrote: > On 5/17/07, Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I >> noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but >> they were all empty. Are

[arch] ALPM bindings

2007-05-17 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I was browsing through the sources of ALPM downloaded from the cvs and I noticed that there were folders for bindings for java, python, etc., but they were all empty. Are the bindings to be implemented? Will other language bindings be accepted in the main source tree? __

Re: [arch] New release schedule

2007-04-12 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 23:28:45 schrieb Mircea Bardac: > >> My only problem with the digits is the fact that there's no separator in >> MM, and it's a bit difficult to read. Other than that, it's ok, from my >> point of view. >> > > This could be fixed by us

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

2006-05-18 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Vinay S Shastry wrote: > My take: > > ArchLinux 0.8 (Vibrance) > ArchLinux 0.8 (Light) > ArchLinux 0.8 (Prestige) > ArchLinux 0.8 (Dragon) > ArchLinux 0.8 (Butterfly) > ArchLinux 0.8 (Creative) > ArchLinux 0.8 (Community) > ArchLinux 0.8 (Myth) > > Arch Linux 0.4 was already named Dragon. Read t

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

2006-05-16 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Some of the names proposed seems to have been influenced by the Ubuntu naming conventions. I think we should stick to our own conventions - one word codenames, conveying something meaningful. Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > This is split from - [arch] when will 0.7.2 be out? > Let the name thinking st

Re: [arch] when will 0.7.2 be out?

2006-05-16 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Douglas Andrade wrote: > I think that Arch Linux 0.8 "Community" would be a good name since a > lot happened that envolved the whole arch community, like the server > donation. > > On 5/16/06, * Snorre* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:26:11 +02

Re: [arch] Should I see RMS?

2006-04-06 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Aaron Griffin wrote: > I'm debating going to this, but also throwing this out there for > anyone in the Chicago-land area. > > ===>> > > April 28, 2006: *Seminar: * The Free Software Movement and the GNU/Linux > Operating System* > >The University of Illinois at Chicago >Department of Compu

Re: [arch] How often to reboot

2006-03-09 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Jason Chu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:39:59AM -0700, Derek Carlson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am torn. >> >> This particular Arch configured PC has been up and running for, now, 49 >> days. During that time, the system was upgraded at least 6 times. It >> is kept in sync with the testin

Re: [arch] firefox

2005-12-14 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Eric Dan wrote: >my firefox was really slow. the 1.0.7 i upgraded to 1.5 today, and still >certain sites take up to 7+ minutes to load, ebay for instance. the log >in site. >i then removed java run time j2re package and now it works fine. >Does anyone else have that problem,too? > >___

Re: [arch] kernel smp and not-smp

2005-12-12 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
SaintShakaJin wrote: >So, explain me why most of distribution has 2 kernels? Debian, Mandriva, >Fedora, Ubuntu etc... have 2 kernels one with SMP and one without that. >Why all of these doesn't share this policy? > >I know Arch is Bleeding Edge but Bleeding Edge is synonym of >instability? I don

Re: [arch] kernel smp and not-smp

2005-12-12 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
But then again, that is only my opinion - I'm sure many users will greet the addition of a kernel which differs by only one configuration option as long as it saves them the time to build the kernel themselves... >Bozhidar Batsov a écrit : > > >>SaintShakaJin wrote: &g

Re: [arch] kernel smp and not-smp

2005-12-12 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
SaintShakaJin wrote: >Hello, > >I think to have 2 kernels will be a great idea, one for SMP computer and >one without SMP. All distributions do that, so why not us? Is there a >reason? >Ndiswrapper freeze with SMP activated, some laptop with acpi enabled >have problem with SMP so why not to do

Re: [arch] Clarification on How the Rolling Release System Works

2005-11-18 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Doug Jolley wrote: > I wanted to take a moment to thank all who responded to my inquiry in > this thread. > > I come from a Slackware heritage. I'd probably be running Slack today > but for 3 reasons listed in decreasing order of importance to me: (1) > It doesn't have a package management sys

Re: [arch] Judd, we need roadmap!!!

2005-10-28 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>With the exception of one package improperly installed the last time I >>>tried it; the ftp install will get you the very latest packages >>>without having to install the older ones from the cd you ar

Re: [arch] Judd, we need roadmap!!!

2005-10-28 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Although Arch is not release type distro like Fedora and SuSE it would be nice if installation cds were made available on a regular basis a-la-Gentoo/BSD... New users will be more tempted to try Arch that way, users with slow or no Internet will be able to upgrade their systems... I think that if A

Re: [arch] Keyboard stopped working - Can't logon now

2005-10-26 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Rosenstrauch, David wrote: > > >>>Hi, in the past I used to have this problem with gdm (now I >>> >>> >>use kdm) and I >> >> >>>have seen it too in entrance (enlightenment display >>> >>> >>manager), when any of >> >> >>>those was the problem, I just had to login with the

Re: [arch] Problem with /etc/arch-release

2005-10-24 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
matthew g wrote: >OK just wanted to make sure it was a bug cause there a few people that >like to flame me for posting a bug thats not a bug. >On 10/24/05, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On 10/24/05, matthew g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>I did pacman -Syu a few days ag

Re: [arch] Openoffice2 went to testing

2005-10-17 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Greg Meyer wrote: On Monday 17 October 2005 06:41 am, Greg Meyer wrote: On Monday 17 October 2005 04:06 am, Tom K wrote: the right place for enabling the ppl to check if everything will work. OO 2.0 has so many improvements so i think ppl are happy to get the new OO. Just ins

[arch] Networking issues after a massive upgrade

2005-10-10 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I yesterday finally found the time to upgrade my home box after the big move of packages from testing to current and extra. I downloaded abount 900MB of upgrades which pretty much means I replaced almost everything. After ajusting a couple of settings I logged in my polished new GNOME 2.12, rea

Re: [arch] package corrupted in the testing repo

2005-09-30 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
甘露 wrote: > sure, did that several times (rm > /var/cache/pacman/pkg/libxslt-1.1.15-1.pkg.tar.gz ) before I tried > another server. > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *On Behalf Of *matthew g > *Sent:

Re: [arch] Put [community] by default into 0.8

2005-09-21 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:42:28PM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: Even the considered user-friendly Fedora has only the updates and extras repos in its configuration by default which implies that they expect the user to do a little browsing on his own... But

Re: [arch] Put [community] by default into 0.8

2005-09-21 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:14:35AM -0700, Celti wrote: Put it commented into pacman.conf, and let people edit pacman.conf in the 'Edit config files' installer step. Problem solved. Not fully. At least explain the meaning of the repositories in pacman.conf in m

Re: [arch] Put [community] by default into 0.8

2005-09-21 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:30:14AM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: Such a discussion, for a matter so simple. I think that it would best that the community repo is included in the defalt pacman configuration, but it should be commented out, anyone who cares to check

Re: [arch] Put [community] by default into 0.8

2005-09-21 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Such a discussion, for a matter so simple. I think that it would best that the community repo is included in the defalt pacman configuration, but it should be commented out, anyone who cares to check the config will be able enable it... If it isn't included in the config however some people may

Re: [arch] [INT][PKG]: scim and acroread/realplayer

2005-09-10 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Damir Perisa wrote: Hi David, Le Saturday 10 September 2005 02:39, David Mézerette a écrit : | I've been pointed out the following thread on archforum: | http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=11551 | regarding problems between scim, acroread and realplayer. in the end this is because they c

Re: [arch] Codename for the upcoming Arch Linux 0.8

2005-09-10 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Judd Vinet wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:29:52AM -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote: Come on... after Wombat for 0.7?! Noodly isn't bad, even if no one gets it (how many people know what Vega is?), but why not nounify it and make it Noodle? That'd be more in line with previous versions. Noo

Re: [arch] Codename for the upcoming Arch Linux 0.8

2005-09-09 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Omni reminds me of the evil samurai Omni-San from James Clavell's Shogun and Noodly reminds of the characther Robert de Niro played in Once Upon a Time in America - a gangster named Noodles... This discussion however seems pointless as it is quite obvious to me that the first suggestion Omni se

Re: [arch] Codename for the upcoming Arch Linux 0.8

2005-09-08 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Andrew Rose wrote: On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Thomas Bächler wrote: Bozhidar Batsov schrieb: I read at the newsletter that suggestions are needed for the codename of the upcoming Arch Linux 0.8. I have a few in mind, but I'm not certain if they will considered to be good ones... So here

[arch] Codename for the upcoming Arch Linux 0.8

2005-09-08 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I read at the newsletter that suggestions are needed for the codename of the upcoming Arch Linux 0.8. I have a few in mind, but I'm not certain if they will considered to be good ones... So here I go (again on my own, going down the only road, I've ever ... damn Whitesnake are so good:) ) : 1.

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-07 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
stoodi wrote: Gnome 2.12 on ftp.gnome.org :) The time has come for all patriotic men to come and aid their country ;) GNOME hegemony ! ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
nt, NO_ONE really knows. Very best regards; Bob Finch Actually 6 of the top ten distros use KDE by default... This fact speaks for itself... The KDE version of Ubuntu is gaining popularity fast currently and both Fedora and Debian ship with KDE apart from GNOME... On 9/2/05, Bozhidar Bats

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bozhidar Batsov wrote: 1.Runs perfectly - as many things in life that is rather relative, but I've had my hands on GNOME in several distros and even FreeBSD and everywhere else I had better exprience with GNOME, but none if this OS had evenpart of Arch&#x

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Jan de Groot wrote: On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 12:44 +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: Hello, With the upcoming release of the new GNOME 2.12, I want to say a couple of things... 1. Arch is said to do not have a default desktop environment - even so, I was left under the impression that a lot

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: Bozhidar Batsov wrote: Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: Bozhidar Batsov wrote: 1.Runs perfectly - as many things in life that is rather relative, but I've had my hands on GNOME in several distros and even FreeBSD and everywhere else I had better expr

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: Bozhidar Batsov wrote: 1.Runs perfectly - as many things in life that is rather relative, but I've had my hands on GNOME in several distros and even FreeBSD and everywhere else I had better exprience with GNOME, but none if this OS had evenpart of Arch&#x

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
RedShift wrote: Bozhidar Batsov wrote: Hello, With the upcoming release of the new GNOME 2.12, I want to say a couple of things... 1. Arch is said to do not have a default desktop environment - even so, I was left under the impression that a lot more work goes into building quality KDE

[arch] GNOME 2.12

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Hello, With the upcoming release of the new GNOME 2.12, I want to say a couple of things... 1. Arch is said to do not have a default desktop environment - even so, I was left under the impression that a lot more work goes into building quality KDE packages than GNOME's, which is somewhat accep

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.10.2 Issues...

2005-09-02 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
甘露 wrote: >Have you checked the permission? Can you open the "propriety" dialog and see >the "open with" tag? > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bozhidar Batsov >Sent: Thursday, September 01, 200

[arch] GNOME 2.10.2 Issues...

2005-09-01 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I cannot change the "Open With" applications for the different file types - like .doc, .avi, etc in GNOME. When I select application from the "Open With" dialog I get - "Error - Cannot add application to the applications database". Does anybody have any idea what's causing this problem. Also th

Re: [arch] Pronunciation of our beloved distribution's name

2005-08-25 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
James Rayner wrote: I speak Australian and I say arc :P iphitus On 8/25/05, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:01:48AM +, Andy Roberts wrote: On Thursday 25 Aug 2005 07:26, James Rayner wrote: I'm guil

Re: [arch] Pronounciation of our beloved distribution's name

2005-08-24 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Bozhidar Batsov wrote: Judd Vinet wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:34:22AM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: I guess we're really lost now and only Judd can help... But from the responses up to now I feel arch as in archie:) and not as in archangel is most commonly used in our comm

Re: [arch] Pronnounciation of our beloved distribution's name

2005-08-24 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Judd Vinet wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:34:22AM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: I guess we're really lost now and only Judd can help... But from the responses up to now I feel arch as in archie:) and not as in archangel is most commonly used in our community... I think every

Re: [arch] Pronnounciation of our beloved distribution's name

2005-08-24 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
I guess we're really lost now and only Judd can help... But from the responses up to now I feel arch as in archie:) and not as in archangel is most commonly used in our community... ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mai

Re: [arch] Pronnounciation of our beloved distribution's name

2005-08-24 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/05, Andy Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 24 Aug 2005 14:15, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: Hello, I hate to bother you with such foolish question, but does someone now how does Judd refer to the distro, because the word &quo

[arch] Pronnounciation of our beloved distribution's name

2005-08-24 Thread Bozhidar Batsov
Hello, I hate to bother you with such foolish question, but does someone now how does Judd refer to the distro, because the word "arch" has double pronnounciation - [a:tS] and [a:k]. We are having a fierce quarrel with some guys in our LUG on that subject currently. So can some clear t