Re: [arch] Mutt and spamassassin

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 02:35:44PM -0400, Scott wrote: >On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 08:21:26PM +0200, Johan Grahn wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I'm using mutt as my primary mail-reader, and using fdm + spamassassin >> to fetch and search mail. I problem is when a spam-mai

[arch] Mutt and spamassassin

Hello. I'm using mutt as my primary mail-reader, and using fdm + spamassassin to fetch and search mail. I problem is when a spam-mail is getting through mutt. Is there any way to tell spamassassin that a given mail is a spam? Thanks! // Johan ___ arc

Re: [arch] No interface although module is loaded

What happens if you run: ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:34:43PM +0200, Johannes Held wrote: >Hi, > >I have some problem with my ethernet card. >The module (r8169) is loaded [detected by setup and hwd -s] and lspci show's >me >the card. >But there is no interface eth0. Onl

Re: [arch] [security] Alert on Bind Fixed

These sercurity warnings, are there any system that generates them or are there just devs checking the package website? On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 01:12:00PM +0200, JJDaNiMoTh wrote: > > >Arch Linux Security Warning ALSW 2007-#35 >---

Re: [arch] Plans for switching to new package naming format (name-ver-rel -> name-ver-rel-arch)

On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 22:43 +0100, Andrew Fyfe wrote: > Are there any plans (if so when) to switch the official repositories > over to the new package naming format? > > Current/Old: name-ver-rel.pkg.tar.gz > New: name-ver-rel-arch.pkg.tar.gz Why do you wanna do this? I'm just curios... Is it

Re: [arch] $SHELL completion

On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:00 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > hi there. i wanted to ask if theres any thoughts including the bash and > zsh completion packages into the default installation of the above > metioned shells. I don't think so because base has alot of packages allready and completion

Re: [arch] New Emacs. Anyone Packaging ?

Why are you trying to get away from your addictions with vim? On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:52:29PM -0300, Alexandre Moreira wrote: >Is there anyone (planning to) packaging the new emacs release (22.1) ? >I just decided to try this editor once again (trying to get away from >my vim addiction) and wo

Re: [arch] Reiser4

On Saturday 19 May 2007 22.40.22 Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: > I'm not sure whether this was discussed before (I mean recently, it > might have been brought up a long time ago but a lot has changed > since). > > Althought reiser4 still has not accepted by Linus, it seems it's > fairly stable and v