On 6/15/07, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after investigating the bash-completion package i must admit that most
> of the files included in the pkg are not needed by most users. some
> might even be considered decrepated. that doesnt apply to the archlinux
> specific file though.
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:00 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> > hi there. i wanted to ask if theres any thoughts including the bash
and
> > zsh completion packages into the default installation of the above
> > metioned shells.
>
> I don't think so because base has alot of packages allready an
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:29:20PM +0200, Johan Grahn wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:00 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> > hi there. i wanted to ask if theres any thoughts including the bash and
> > zsh completion packages into the default installation of the above
> > metioned shells.
>
> I
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:00 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> hi there. i wanted to ask if theres any thoughts including the bash and
> zsh completion packages into the default installation of the above
> metioned shells.
I don't think so because base has alot of packages allready and
completion
hi there. i wanted to ask if theres any thoughts including the bash and
zsh completion packages into the default installation of the above
metioned shells.
also there an unsolved afaik issue with zsh-pacman
(currently in aur). has any progress been made in adding it to pacman?
phrakture had said s
