Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-31 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Sergej Pupykin wrote: > >> I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot > upgrade my > >> whole system because I'm on slow dialup. > >> > > DR> Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend Arch > DR> as a good choice of distro. > > How other

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-29 Thread Jose M. Prieto
El Viernes, 28 de Julio de 2006 13:45, Sergej Pupykin escribió: > >> I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd > >> properly? > > JdG> Don't rebuild, upgrade your system. Upgrading openssl only is not > smart. > > How can I update all packages that depends on openssl (

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-29 Thread Robert Emil Berge
Lørdag 29 juli 2006 00:55, skrev Sergej Pupykin: > >> I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot > >> upgrade my whole system because I'm on slow dialup. > > DR> Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend > Arch DR> as a good choice of distro. >

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread Sergej Pupykin
>> I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot >> upgrade my >> whole system because I'm on slow dialup. >> DR> Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend Arch DR> as a good choice of distro. How other distros solve this problems?

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread David Rosenstrauch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear Archers, > > I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot upgrade > my > whole system because I'm on slow dialup. > > Best regards, > > Ben Shi Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend Arch as a good choice of

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread Sergej Pupykin
>> I see that I can do this, but anyway upgrading all system is not solution. TB> It is. Archlinux development works this way. If you install something new, you should always update TB> your whole system, so packages will stay compatible. Great! Every time I update some lib I should update w

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sergej Pupykin schrieb: > I see that I can do this, but anyway upgrading all system is not solution. It is. Archlinux development works this way. If you install something new, you should always update your whole system, so packages will stay compatib

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread benshi
Dear Archers, I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot upgrade my whole system because I'm on slow dialup. Best regards, Ben Shi On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:48:44 +0200 Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15:45 Fri 28 Jul , Sergej Pupyk

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread Sergej Pupykin
A'B> Is there a reason why you don't want to upgrade all the system (pacman -Syu) ? A'B> IMHO with archlinux it's always the best choice. I see that I can do this, but anyway upgrading all system is not solution. I'm stupid user. I do "pacman -S db openssl". It is legal. And my system become

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino
On 15:45 Fri 28 Jul , Sergej Pupykin wrote: > >> I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd > >> properly? > > JdG> Don't rebuild, upgrade your system. Upgrading openssl only is not smart. > > How can I update all packages that depends on openssl (and any "version

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-28 Thread Sergej Pupykin
>> I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd >> properly? JdG> Don't rebuild, upgrade your system. Upgrading openssl only is not smart. How can I update all packages that depends on openssl (and any "versioned lib")? Pacman can this or I should write script? How can

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-27 Thread Thomas Bächler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sergej Pupykin schrieb: > Ok. but symlink 0.9.7->0.9.8 works. Does it mean that in particular 0.9.8 > version compatible with 0.9.7? Don't do that, it is likely that you will have bugs. Just upgrade your system (the openssh package and most other pac

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-27 Thread Sergej Pupykin
>> Tell me please, why (for example) sshd linked with libssl.so.0.9.7 instead >> libssl.so? JdG> Libssl is a so-called versioned library. Programs can and will break JdG> between 0.9.7 and 0.9.8, some even check on runtime if they are running JdG> against 0.9.8a or 0.9.8b for example. This i

Re: [arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-27 Thread Jan de Groot
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 13:31 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > Hi, All! > > Tell me please, why (for example) sshd linked with libssl.so.0.9.7 instead > libssl.so? Libssl is a so-called versioned library. Programs can and will break between 0.9.7 and 0.9.8, some even check on runtime if they are runn

[arch] .so dependencies

2006-07-27 Thread Sergej Pupykin
Hi, All! Tell me please, why (for example) sshd linked with libssl.so.0.9.7 instead libssl.so? I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd properly? I upgrade openssl to 0.9.8 and all program that depends on it was broken. I can solve this problem by "ln -s libssl.so.0