Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> >> I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot
> upgrade my
> >> whole system because I'm on slow dialup.
> >>
>
> DR> Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend Arch
> DR> as a good choice of distro.
>
> How other
El Viernes, 28 de Julio de 2006 13:45, Sergej Pupykin escribió:
> >> I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd
> >> properly?
>
> JdG> Don't rebuild, upgrade your system. Upgrading openssl only is not
> smart.
>
> How can I update all packages that depends on openssl (
Lørdag 29 juli 2006 00:55, skrev Sergej Pupykin:
> >> I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot
> >> upgrade my whole system because I'm on slow dialup.
>
> DR> Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend
> Arch DR> as a good choice of distro.
>
>> I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot
>> upgrade my
>> whole system because I'm on slow dialup.
>>
DR> Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend Arch
DR> as a good choice of distro.
How other distros solve this problems?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Archers,
>
> I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot upgrade
> my
> whole system because I'm on slow dialup.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ben Shi
Just my $0.02, but if you're running on dialup I wouldn't recommend Arch
as a good choice of
>> I see that I can do this, but anyway upgrading all system is not solution.
TB> It is. Archlinux development works this way. If you install something new,
you should always update
TB> your whole system, so packages will stay compatible.
Great! Every time I update some lib I should update w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sergej Pupykin schrieb:
> I see that I can do this, but anyway upgrading all system is not solution.
It is. Archlinux development works this way. If you install something new, you
should always update
your whole system, so packages will stay compatib
Dear Archers,
I have had the same problem, and I have not yet solved it. I cannot upgrade my
whole system because I'm on slow dialup.
Best regards,
Ben Shi
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:48:44 +0200
Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15:45 Fri 28 Jul , Sergej Pupyk
A'B> Is there a reason why you don't want to upgrade all the system (pacman
-Syu) ?
A'B> IMHO with archlinux it's always the best choice.
I see that I can do this, but anyway upgrading all system is not solution.
I'm stupid user.
I do "pacman -S db openssl". It is legal. And my system become
On 15:45 Fri 28 Jul , Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> >> I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd
> >> properly?
>
> JdG> Don't rebuild, upgrade your system. Upgrading openssl only is not smart.
>
> How can I update all packages that depends on openssl (and any "version
>> I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd
>> properly?
JdG> Don't rebuild, upgrade your system. Upgrading openssl only is not smart.
How can I update all packages that depends on openssl (and any "versioned
lib")? Pacman can this or I should write script?
How can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sergej Pupykin schrieb:
> Ok. but symlink 0.9.7->0.9.8 works. Does it mean that in particular 0.9.8
> version compatible with 0.9.7?
Don't do that, it is likely that you will have bugs. Just upgrade your system
(the openssh package
and most other pac
>> Tell me please, why (for example) sshd linked with libssl.so.0.9.7 instead
>> libssl.so?
JdG> Libssl is a so-called versioned library. Programs can and will break
JdG> between 0.9.7 and 0.9.8, some even check on runtime if they are running
JdG> against 0.9.8a or 0.9.8b for example. This i
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 13:31 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> Tell me please, why (for example) sshd linked with libssl.so.0.9.7 instead
> libssl.so?
Libssl is a so-called versioned library. Programs can and will break
between 0.9.7 and 0.9.8, some even check on runtime if they are runn
Hi, All!
Tell me please, why (for example) sshd linked with libssl.so.0.9.7 instead
libssl.so?
I found some packages with such dependencies. How can I rebuild sshd
properly?
I upgrade openssl to 0.9.8 and all program that depends on it was broken.
I can solve this problem by "ln -s libssl.so.0
15 matches
Mail list logo