Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-03 Thread Paul Mattal
Well then, how about: "HTTPD/version (None of your Damned Business)" or "Something/sometime (What's it to you?)" I'm just having too much fun with this. Sorry. ;) More seriously, I agree that the standard announce line should stay. - P Armando M. Baratti wrote: I agree with Matthias, it's not obs

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-03 Thread Armando M. Baratti
I agree with Matthias, it's not obscurity, it's the same when a firewall put a port in stealth mode, it just doesn't respond to a request to that port. Armando Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Tobias Kieslich schrieb: On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:05:59 +0200 Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-03 Thread Barton
I vote: Server: AOLServer 5.0 (AmigaDOS) On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:01 am, Tomasz Bakiera wrote: > >> Maybe this could confuse them more: > >> > >> Arch -> Server: Apache 1.0 (WindowsME) > > No, no, NI > > Server: Apache 2.0.53 (DOS) > or > Server: Apache 2.0.53 (OpenDOS) > > :-) > > -- > Tomasz

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-03 Thread Tomasz Bakiera
Maybe this could confuse them more: Arch -> Server: Apache 1.0 (WindowsME) No, no, NI Server: Apache 2.0.53 (DOS) or Server: Apache 2.0.53 (OpenDOS) :-) -- Tomasz Bakiera -- Znajdz sobie auto na wiosne! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread RedShift
Seeing your operating system on index pages and stuff, is cool at first, but personally, I like Server: Apache/2.0.53 (Unix) much more, it's "cooler" :D Oscar Estrada wrote: On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 23:52 -0500, Paul Mattal wrote: How about: Arch -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (SunOS 4.1.3) That would th

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Oscar Estrada
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 23:52 -0500, Paul Mattal wrote: > How about: > > Arch -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (SunOS 4.1.3) > > That would throw them all off the scent. ;) > > - P > > Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > > Jürgen Hötzel schrieb: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> everybody does it: > >> > >> Redhat ->

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Paul Mattal
How about: Arch -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (SunOS 4.1.3) That would throw them all off the scent. ;) - P Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Jürgen Hötzel schrieb: Hi, everybody does it: Redhat -> Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Gentoo -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Gentoo/Linux) ArchLinux could show up at netc

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Tobias Kieslich
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:52:00 +0200 Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tobias Kieslich schrieb: > >I like to second that, since a line like "Apache (latest version)" reads for > >a potential hacker like "I know my business, I'm uptodate". From a > >psychological point of view this

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Tobias Kieslich schrieb: On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:05:59 +0200 Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jep I agree. But notice that this is a _big_ security risk because the cracker knows which distribution you're running and can use distribution specific security holes (e.g. unpatched

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Patrick Leslie Polzer
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > Jep I agree. But notice that this is a _big_ security risk because the > cracker knows which distribution you're running and can use > distribution specific security holes (e.g. unpatched security holes or > security holes in old software). Oh, we're not talking ab

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Tobias Kieslich
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:05:59 +0200 Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jep I agree. But notice that this is a _big_ security risk because the > cracker knows which distribution you're running and can use distribution > specific security holes (e.g. unpatched security holes or sec

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Simo Leone
IMHO, using a "sed -i" line in the PKGBUILD would be cleaner. Otherwise, I like the idea. Actually, even cleaner than that would be to do something like this... export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DPLATFORM=ArchLinux" but I tried that and kept getting odd errors on build. Simo On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 21:53 +02

Re: [arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Jürgen Hötzel schrieb: Hi, everybody does it: Redhat -> Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Gentoo -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Gentoo/Linux) ArchLinux could show up at netcraft like other distributions: http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/03/14/fedora_makes_rapid_progress.html Enclosed my patch (based

[arch] Apache branding

2005-04-02 Thread Jürgen Hötzel
Hi, everybody does it: Redhat -> Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Gentoo -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Gentoo/Linux) ArchLinux could show up at netcraft like other distributions: http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/03/14/fedora_makes_rapid_progress.html Enclosed my patch (based on Gentoos). BTW: