Well then, how about:
"HTTPD/version (None of your Damned Business)"
or
"Something/sometime (What's it to you?)"
I'm just having too much fun with this. Sorry. ;) More seriously, I
agree that the standard announce line should stay.
- P
Armando M. Baratti wrote:
I agree with Matthias, it's not obs
I agree with Matthias, it's not obscurity, it's the same when a firewall
put a port in stealth mode, it just doesn't respond to a request to that
port.
Armando
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
Tobias Kieslich schrieb:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:05:59 +0200
Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
I vote:
Server: AOLServer 5.0 (AmigaDOS)
On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:01 am, Tomasz Bakiera wrote:
> >> Maybe this could confuse them more:
> >>
> >> Arch -> Server: Apache 1.0 (WindowsME)
>
> No, no, NI
>
> Server: Apache 2.0.53 (DOS)
> or
> Server: Apache 2.0.53 (OpenDOS)
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Tomasz
Maybe this could confuse them more:
Arch -> Server: Apache 1.0 (WindowsME)
No, no, NI
Server: Apache 2.0.53 (DOS)
or
Server: Apache 2.0.53 (OpenDOS)
:-)
--
Tomasz Bakiera
--
Znajdz sobie auto na wiosne! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f
Seeing your operating system on index pages and stuff, is cool at first,
but personally, I like Server: Apache/2.0.53 (Unix) much more, it's
"cooler" :D
Oscar Estrada wrote:
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 23:52 -0500, Paul Mattal wrote:
How about:
Arch -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (SunOS 4.1.3)
That would th
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 23:52 -0500, Paul Mattal wrote:
> How about:
>
> Arch -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (SunOS 4.1.3)
>
> That would throw them all off the scent. ;)
>
> - P
>
> Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> > Jürgen Hötzel schrieb:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> everybody does it:
> >>
> >> Redhat ->
How about:
Arch -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (SunOS 4.1.3)
That would throw them all off the scent. ;)
- P
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
Jürgen Hötzel schrieb:
Hi,
everybody does it:
Redhat -> Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat)
Gentoo -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Gentoo/Linux)
ArchLinux could show up at netc
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:52:00 +0200
Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tobias Kieslich schrieb:
> >I like to second that, since a line like "Apache (latest version)" reads for
> >a potential hacker like "I know my business, I'm uptodate". From a
> >psychological point of view this
Tobias Kieslich schrieb:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:05:59 +0200
Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jep I agree. But notice that this is a _big_ security risk because the
cracker knows which distribution you're running and can use distribution
specific security holes (e.g. unpatched
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Jep I agree. But notice that this is a _big_ security risk because the
> cracker knows which distribution you're running and can use
> distribution specific security holes (e.g. unpatched security holes or
> security holes in old software).
Oh, we're not talking ab
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:05:59 +0200
Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jep I agree. But notice that this is a _big_ security risk because the
> cracker knows which distribution you're running and can use distribution
> specific security holes (e.g. unpatched security holes or sec
IMHO, using a "sed -i" line in the PKGBUILD would be cleaner. Otherwise,
I like the idea. Actually, even cleaner than that would be to do
something like this... export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DPLATFORM=ArchLinux" but
I tried that and kept getting odd errors on build.
Simo
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 21:53 +02
Jürgen Hötzel schrieb:
Hi,
everybody does it:
Redhat -> Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat)
Gentoo -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Gentoo/Linux)
ArchLinux could show up at netcraft like other distributions:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/03/14/fedora_makes_rapid_progress.html
Enclosed my patch (based
Hi,
everybody does it:
Redhat -> Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat)
Gentoo -> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Gentoo/Linux)
ArchLinux could show up at netcraft like other distributions:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/03/14/fedora_makes_rapid_progress.html
Enclosed my patch (based on Gentoos).
BTW:
14 matches
Mail list logo