Re: [arch] Kernel 2.6.14 and ipw2200

2005-12-19 Thread Baron Horatio von Phydeaux XXXVII
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm up and running on 2.6.15-rc6 and so far everything looks good. I can't wait for the final version to make it into arch. andy Thomas B?chler wrote: > Baron Horatio von Phydeaux XXXVII schrieb: >> How long do you think it will be before 2.6.15 mak

Re: [arch] Kernel 2.6.14 and ipw2200

2005-12-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Baron Horatio von Phydeaux XXXVII schrieb: > How long do you think it will be before 2.6.15 makes it into arch > current? I mean 2.6.14 just went into current. I'd expect to see > 2.6.15 come into testing soon, but it'll probably be a bit before it > makes its way into current. 2.6.14 only staye

Re: [arch] Kernel 2.6.14 and ipw2200

2005-12-19 Thread Baron Horatio von Phydeaux XXXVII
How long do you think it will be before 2.6.15 makes it into arch current? I mean 2.6.14 just went into current. I'd expect to see 2.6.15 come into testing soon, but it'll probably be a bit before it makes its way into current. I've just started baking a 2.6.15-rc6 kernel just to see how things

Re: [arch] Kernel 2.6.14 and ipw2200

2005-12-19 Thread James Rayner
> I've seen some posts on the message boards from users with ipw2200 cards > and the new kernel having some troubles. > > First off most of the version of ipw2200 in the kernel is 1.0.0 which is > rather old. ..if a trusted user would take this up > so the packages would make it into c

[arch] Kernel 2.6.14 and ipw2200

2005-12-18 Thread Baron Horatio von Phydeaux XXXVII
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've seen some posts on the message boards from users with ipw2200 cards and the new kernel having some troubles. First off most of the version of ipw2200 in the kernel is 1.0.0 which is rather old. Reading over at ipw's site is seems that they're no