Re: [arch] Outdated gnome

2006-08-11 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 01:53 +0800, Low Kian Seong wrote: > > If you really were a fan of gnome, you would have noticed that 2.16 > > isn't released as stable (2nd beta) and GNOME 2.14.3 is the current > > stable version, which we're running on archlinux except for 19 > packages > > currently (this

Re: [arch] Outdated gnome

2006-08-11 Thread Low Kian Seong
> > Please stop posting in HTML, switch over your mailclient to plaintext > for this list please. Right. Sorry. Didn't notice I had it turned on. My bad. > > If you really were a fan of gnome, you would have noticed that 2.16 > isn't released as stable (2nd beta) and GNOME 2.14.3 is the current >

Re: [arch] Outdated gnome

2006-08-11 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 00:52 +0800, Low Kian Seong wrote: > Dear people, > > I am a gnome desktop fan and the gnome version on arch is old to say > the very least. The current is sporting version 2.14. Where can I get > my hands on 2.16 ( Prefably a pacman source ) ? > Please stop posting in HTML

[arch] Outdated gnome

2006-08-11 Thread Low Kian Seong
Dear people,I am a gnome desktop fan and the gnome version on arch is old to say the very least. The current is sporting version 2.14. Where can I get my hands on 2.16 ( Prefably a pacman source ) ?Regards LowKS ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org ht