Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

On 4/13/07, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Install hicolor-icon-theme and run gtk-update-icon-cache -q -t -f > /usr/share/icons/hicolor > > I guess the xfce menu can't find an icon and load it anyways, resulting in a > crash somewhere deep in gtk and libpng. Thank you!!! Now my backtrac

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

amens bardo Verzonden: vrijdag 13 april 2007 10:18 Aan: General Discusson about Arch Linux Onderwerp: Re: [arch] xfce and /usr On 4/12/07, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If any of you could provide me with a backtrace and/or more info, I could > post it to Xfce ml, and se

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

On 4/12/07, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If any of you could provide me with a backtrace and/or more info, I could > post it to Xfce ml, and see if they know of anything Here it is: (gdb) bt full #0 0xb7625dcd in malloc_consolidate () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info avai

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

2007/4/12, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: bardo wrote: > On 4/12/07, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The solution would be to do --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc >> > > Sorry for thread hijacking, probably it's unrelated, but it looks like > a good placeholder for questions relat

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

bardo wrote: > On 4/12/07, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The solution would be to do --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc >> > > Sorry for thread hijacking, probably it's unrelated, but it looks like > a good placeholder for questions related to the new xfce... > > Am I the onl

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 15:53 +0300, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > The segfault could be due to the static libraries. The last time I > tried > was xfce 4.4rc1 and I had to recompile all xfce with > --disable-static to remove the xfdesktop segfault. > Xfburn also did not work unless it is compiled with

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:50 +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > hi. > why can't you bear to see some software lie in /opt ? > what's so annoying about that ? > > so please, tell us: > What's the real reason to move xfce and gnome to /usr ? > to please some loudly users who whant that move ? > to fi

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:37 +0200, bardo wrote: > On 4/12/07, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The solution would be to do --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc > > Sorry for thread hijacking, probably it's unrelated, but it looks like > a good placeholder for questions related to the new

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

>sd> What's the real reason to move xfce and gnome to /usr ? I don't know why, but I think it is good idea. According to LSB /opt should contain add-on third-party software. I prefer empty /opt in distro and install into it precompiled/proprietary soft, so I can include whole /opt into backups

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

2007/4/12, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I noticed xfce was moved to /usr but the maintainer didn't specify >> --systconfdir=/etc so some packages installed files in /usr/etc which is a >> non standard location. xfdesktop is one of those packages where it installs >> files in /usr/etc/xdg/xf

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

2007/4/12, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > hi. > why can't you bear to see some software lie in /opt ? > what's so annoying about that ? > > so please, tell us: > What's the real reason to move xfce and gnome to /usr ? > to please some loudly users who whant that move ? > to fix what issues

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

hi. why can't you bear to see some software lie in /opt ? what's so annoying about that ? so please, tell us: What's the real reason to move xfce and gnome to /usr ? to please some loudly users who whant that move ? to fix what issues ? ___ arch mai

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

On 4/12/07, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The solution would be to do --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc Sorry for thread hijacking, probably it's unrelated, but it looks like a good placeholder for questions related to the new xfce... Am I the only one that has a segfaulting xfdeskto

Re: [arch] xfce and /usr

look sucks) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Hussam Al-Tayeb Verzonden: donderdag 12 april 2007 2:26 Aan: General Discusson about Arch Linux Onderwerp: [arch] xfce and /usr I noticed xfce was moved to /usr but the maintainer didn't specify --s

[arch] xfce and /usr

I noticed xfce was moved to /usr but the maintainer didn't specify --systconfdir=/etc so some packages installed files in /usr/etc which is a non standard location. xfdesktop is one of those packages where it installs files in /usr/etc/xdg/xfce4/ instead of /etc/xdg/xfce4/ The solution would be to