Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-02 Thread Varun Acharya
On Jan 3, 2008 5:07 AM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > isn't pulse a replacement for esd? i think it should be in extra, yes. > there is a request for mpd to be compiled with pulseaudio enabled: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8472 > if you move it, let me know so that i can make m

Re: [arch-dev-public] Updated perl 5.10.0

2008-01-02 Thread K. Piche
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 20:56 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > On Jan 2, 2008 8:10 PM, K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Seems that there's a symbol that used to be in some perl lib but isn't > > > > anymore (Perl_Tstack_sp_ptr). > > > > > > > > I can create a bug if need be. > > > > > > Same issu

Re: [arch-dev-public] Updated perl 5.10.0

2008-01-02 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 2, 2008 8:10 PM, K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Seems that there's a symbol that used to be in some perl lib but isn't > > > anymore (Perl_Tstack_sp_ptr). > > > > > > I can create a bug if need be. > > > > Same issue for urxvt: > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9075 > > > > -Dan

Re: [arch-dev-public] Updated perl 5.10.0

2008-01-02 Thread K. Piche
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 07:11 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > On Jan 2, 2008 1:34 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:16:19PM -0500, K. Piche wrote: > > > I put perl 5.10.0 in testing. It follows the new perl hierarchy, the > > > install file removes the symlink farm t

Re: [arch-dev-public] netfs daemon script failing on shutdown

2008-01-02 Thread Jeff 'codemac' Mickey
With no network filesystems mounted, it succeeds. I'm at home, so none of my nfs mounts are usable. // jeff -- .: [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] :. pgpFccScx7Q0i.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] sudo: need x86_64 build and signoff

2008-01-02 Thread Jeff 'codemac' Mickey
Sign off for i686. // jeff -- .: [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] :. pgpfAqvCq3ZKP.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libdownload 1.3

2008-01-02 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 2, 2008 7:32 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thursday 03 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote: > | On Dec 13, 2007 4:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > 2007/12/13, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > | > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote: > | > >

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libdownload 1.3

2008-01-02 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 03 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote: | On Dec 13, 2007 4:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > 2007/12/13, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote: | > > > On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > > >> On

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libdownload 1.3

2008-01-02 Thread Dan McGee
On Dec 13, 2007 4:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/12/13, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > > > On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-02 Thread Damir Perisa
Wednesday 02 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: | Hi, | I'd like to bring the following packages into extra in the near | future and maintain them.. Please let me know if you have any | objections | | - smplayer / smplayer-themes - qt4 based frontend for mplayer | http://bugs.archlinux.org/t

Re: [arch-dev-public] qt4 timeframe? stoppers? breaks? anything in the wheels?

2008-01-02 Thread Damir Perisa
Wednesday 02 January 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote: | Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 15:47:49 schrieb Damir Perisa: | > it's me again, the testing-remindering-nag-person. this time in | > the programme... qt4. | > | > i knwo that lots was going on and qt is not in version 4 in | > testing as well

[arch-dev-public] netfs daemon script failing on shutdown

2008-01-02 Thread Dan McGee
I've noticed lately that netfs always fails to shut down correctly, and I was wondering if this is just my system or if others are also noticing this. An easy way to check: sudo /etc/rc.d/netfs restart If you see a [FAIL], you're in the same boat as me. Let me know and I'll file a bug report if mo

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 2, 2008 12:20 PM, Varun Acharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to bring the following packages into extra in the near future and > maintain them.. Please let me know if you have any objections > > - smplayer / smplayer-themes - qt4 based frontend for mplayer testing first, of c

[arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-02 Thread Varun Acharya
Hi, I'd like to bring the following packages into extra in the near future and maintain them.. Please let me know if you have any objections - smplayer / smplayer-themes - qt4 based frontend for mplayer http://blog.paulbetts.org/index.php/2007/04/15/pulseaudio-in-ubuntu-feisty-play-sound-over-the-

Re: [arch-dev-public] sudo: need x86_64 build and signoff

2008-01-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Dec 30, 2007 10:58 PM, Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > New sudo 1.6.9p10-3 is up for i686, but needs an x86_64 build and is > otherwise ready for signoff. > > It's an upgrade from p9 to p10, which fixes the broken behavior of the > -p flag-- it should work now where it didn't before. >

Re: [arch-dev-public] sudo: need x86_64 build and signoff

2008-01-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Dec 31, 2007 2:15 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:58:58 -0500 > schrieb Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > New sudo 1.6.9p10-3 is up for i686, but needs an x86_64 build and is > > otherwise ready for signoff. > > x86_64 package built but not yet tested.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] tzdata 2007k-1

2008-01-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 1, 2008 8:32 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in testing for both archs. just a minor update. don't ask me how to > test that pkg. Signed off, both arches

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.4.11

2008-01-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 1, 2008 9:05 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Minor version bump. > > Tested on i686, built for both architectures. Easiest way to test is > with pacman and using bsdtar on an archive. Signed off, both arches

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] man 1.6f-1

2008-01-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 1, 2008 6:46 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just a minor update. added diffutils as a dependency to solve > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8793 > > it's in testing for both architectures. Signed off both arches

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] file 4.23-1

2008-01-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 1, 2008 7:45 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in testing for both architectures. just an update. Signed off both arches

Re: [arch-dev-public] qt4 timeframe? stoppers? breaks? anything in the wheels?

2008-01-02 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 15:47:49 schrieb Damir Perisa: > it's me again, the testing-remindering-nag-person. this time in the > programme... qt4. > > i knwo that lots was going on and qt is not in version 4 in testing as > well as qt3 also there. i ran into lack of pyqt (4) some time ago but >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Updated perl 5.10.0

2008-01-02 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 2, 2008 1:34 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:16:19PM -0500, K. Piche wrote: > > I put perl 5.10.0 in testing. It follows the new perl hierarchy, the > > install file removes the symlink farm that confused everybody and it > > prints a small blurb about

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.4.11

2008-01-02 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 2, 2008 4:43 AM, Varun Acharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Signed off for x86_64, though I don't know what bsdtar does. It didn't > segfault, hence the signoff. It is basically identical to GNU 'tar', except that it is reported to be faster (and seems to be so on my machine). I'd recommend

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] man 1.6f-1

2008-01-02 Thread Varun Acharya
On Jan 1, 2008 6:16 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just a minor update. added diffutils as a dependency to solve > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8793 > > it's in testing for both architectures. > > -Andy > ok for x86_64 Varun

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] file 4.23-1

2008-01-02 Thread Varun Acharya
On Jan 1, 2008 7:15 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in testing for both architectures. just an update. > > -Andy > > signed off for x86_64 Varun

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.4.11

2008-01-02 Thread Varun Acharya
On Jan 2, 2008 8:35 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Minor version bump. > > Tested on i686, built for both architectures. Easiest way to test is > with pacman and using bsdtar on an archive. > > -Dan > > Signed off for x86_64, though I don't know what bsdtar does. It didn't segfault, he

Re: [arch-dev-public] zsh, bash and filesystem

2008-01-02 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2008 01:32:09 schrieb Jeff Mickey: > I'm curious why you removed maildir-support and zsh-secure-free as flags to > configure?  I understand that you are saying the etcdir, zshenv, zlogin, > zlogout, and zshrc have zsh not read /etc/profile for some reason or > another, but I