Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-03 Thread Varun Acharya
Oh one more to add to the list, I'd like to move handbrake from AUR to extra. I've tried other software (acidrip,dvdrip,k9copy and many more), but this is the only one which is stable and fast. Sorry for the omission. Varun

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-03 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 03 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: | Oh one more to add to the list, I'd like to move handbrake from | AUR to extra. I've tried other software (acidrip,dvdrip,k9copy and | many more), but this is the only one which is stable and fast. | Sorry for the omission. handbrake is in unsup

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-03 Thread Varun Acharya
> do not import it to [extra] untill it is one pkg that works, but i'm > sure you will not anyway, since you use it yourself? > > conditional +1 for this one: make it work for first. (i didn't try it > myself, dont have a dvd drive, maybe it _does_ work, but i heard 2 > stories about how it fails b

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-03 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 03 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: | > do not import it to [extra] untill it is one pkg that works, but | > i'm sure you will not anyway, since you use it yourself? | > | > conditional +1 for this one: make it work for first. (i didn't | > try it myself, dont have a dvd drive, mayb

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libgpg-error 1.6-1 + libgcrypt-1.4.0-1

2008-01-03 Thread Varun Acharya
On Jan 1, 2008 11:46 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > both packages are just updates that depend on each other and i haven't > found any broken package, that depends on them. both are in testing for > all archs. > > -Andy > > Signed off for x86_64

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libdownload 1.3

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 2, 2008 7:39 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm guessing you got confused with libarchive. :) This is actually > really old and is the signoff for libdownload. I've just pushed it to > core for both architectures as it seems we had enough signoffs, and we > are all responsible an

[arch-dev-public] Web development (was: [signoff] libdownload 1.3)

2008-01-03 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 3, 2008 8:58 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the record, the new dashboard lists packages by repository, so > this should help me in keeping track of signoffs and what needs to > move better (gmail isn't cutting it for that task). > > In the (near?) future I want to integr

Re: [arch-dev-public] Web development (was: [signoff] libdownload 1.3)

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 9:12 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 8:58 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the record, the new dashboard lists packages by repository, so > > this should help me in keeping track of signoffs and what needs to > > move better (gmail isn't

Re: [arch-dev-public] Updated perl 5.10.0

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 2, 2008 8:10 PM, K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 07:11 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2008 1:34 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:16:19PM -0500, K. Piche wrote: > > > > I put perl 5.10.0 in testing. It follows the

Re: [arch-dev-public] netfs daemon script failing on shutdown

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 2, 2008 2:49 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've noticed lately that netfs always fails to shut down correctly, > and I was wondering if this is just my system or if others are also > noticing this. An easy way to check: > sudo /etc/rc.d/netfs restart > > If you see a [FAIL], you

Re: [arch-dev-public] netfs daemon script failing on shutdown

2008-01-03 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 3, 2008 9:54 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2008 2:49 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've noticed lately that netfs always fails to shut down correctly, > > and I was wondering if this is just my system or if others are also > > noticing this. An eas

Re: [arch-dev-public] netfs daemon script failing on shutdown

2008-01-03 Thread Jason Chu
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:49:05PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > I've noticed lately that netfs always fails to shut down correctly, > and I was wondering if this is just my system or if others are also > noticing this. An easy way to check: > sudo /etc/rc.d/netfs restart > > If you see a [FAIL], you'

Re: [arch-dev-public] netfs daemon script failing on shutdown

2008-01-03 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 3, 2008 11:31 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2008 10:51 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:49:05PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > > > I've noticed lately that netfs always fails to shut down correctly, > > > and I was wondering if t

Re: [arch-dev-public] netfs daemon script failing on shutdown

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 10:51 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:49:05PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > > I've noticed lately that netfs always fails to shut down correctly, > > and I was wondering if this is just my system or if others are also > > noticing this. An easy way t

Re: [arch-dev-public] frostwire in unstable

2008-01-03 Thread Varun Acharya
On Dec 31, 2007 4:20 AM, Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was planning to revisit this whenever I packaged the next upstream > release, so now's as good a time as any. Previous thoughts on this > subject here: > > http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=262971#p262971 > > Last few release

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libgpg-error 1.6-1 + libgcrypt-1.4.0-1

2008-01-03 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:16:32 +0100 schrieb Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > both packages are just updates that depend on each other and i haven't > found any broken package, that depends on them. both are in testing > for all archs. > > -Andy > noone for i686?

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libgpg-error 1.6-1 + libgcrypt-1.4.0-1

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 1:05 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:16:32 +0100 > schrieb Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > both packages are just updates that depend on each other and i haven't > > found any broken package, that depends on them. both are in testing >

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] CVS update of extra/multimedia/miro (ChangeLog PKGBUILD)

2008-01-03 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 3, 2008 2:00 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thursday 03 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: > | Index: extra/multimedia/miro/ChangeLog > | diff -u /dev/null extra/multimedia/miro/ChangeLog:1.1 > | --- /dev/nullThu Jan 3 14:48:51 2008 > | +++ extra/multimedia/miro/ChangeLogT

[arch-dev-public] Status questions

2008-01-03 Thread eliott
Just curious about a few projects that may or may not have falled by the wayside over the break. 1. SCM move to SVN. I assume this is still going to happen. Any progress? Bueller? 2. ABS move to rsync. There was some talk regarding moving ABS away from cvsup, towards a more generalized scm agno

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] CVS update of extra/multimedia/miro (ChangeLog PKGBUILD)

2008-01-03 Thread Travis Willard
On Jan 3, 2008 3:20 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thursday 03 January 2008, Travis Willard wrote: > | On Jan 3, 2008 3:00 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Thursday 03 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: > | > | Index: extra/multimedia/miro/ChangeLog > | > |

Re: [arch-dev-public] Status questions

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious about a few projects that may or may not have falled by > the wayside over the break. > > 1. SCM move to SVN. > I assume this is still going to happen. Any progress? Bueller? I was talking to Jason about this less than 4 hou

[arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. ABS move to rsync. > > There was some talk regarding moving ABS away from cvsup, towards a > > more generalized scm agnostic solution such as rsync. I had a proof of

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread Travis Willard
On Jan 3, 2008 4:04 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 2:55 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2. ABS move to rsync. > > > >

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread Travis Willard
On Jan 3, 2008 4:18 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 4:04 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 3, 2008 2:55 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > On Jan 3, 2008

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 2:55 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2. ABS move to rsync. > > > There was some talk regarding moving ABS away from cvsup, towards a > > >

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread eliott
> Bah - that sounded so weak. The message I intended to convey: > > Yes, I will take over the ABS project. Just don't expect me to come at it > with a ton of great ideas right out of the gate. ;) I am willing to take it over as well, since I have my meat hooks all over the backend. However, I am

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread Travis Willard
On Jan 3, 2008 4:51 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bah - that sounded so weak. The message I intended to convey: > > > > Yes, I will take over the ABS project. Just don't expect me to come at > it > > with a ton of great ideas right out of the gate. ;) > > I am willing to take it over

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 3, 2008 3:53 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 4:51 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Bah - that sounded so weak. The message I intended to convey: > > > > > > Yes, I will take over the ABS project. Just don't expect me to come at > it > > > wit

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread eliott
> Eliott, are you on pacman-dev? Discussion there on anything would > probably be our best venue, with an [abs] prefix on the mails. If you > are not on the list, we'll just ensure you get CC'ed in on anything. Not currently, but I can surely add myself. > Aaron or Eliott, can you add an abs-git

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread eliott
> > Aaron or Eliott, can you add an abs-git group sometime on gerolde and > > put Travis, the two of you, and I in the group? And then chown the > > repo to travis.abs-git? Thanks in advance. > > sure thing. done.

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 3:51 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I am *more than* willing to just help out with the project, > if someone else drives. In fact, I would shit myself with happy > flowers and panda bears. I just printed this. You will hang on my office wall. On Jan 3, 2008 3:58 P

Re: [arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)

2008-01-03 Thread eliott
> Just because I'm anal, the colon spec is probably better to use when > you specify these things 8) HAHA! I said the same thing to Dan over jabber. lolz @dan: your face! ;)

Re: [arch-dev-public] qt4 timeframe? stoppers? breaks? anything in the wheels?

2008-01-03 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 00:31:54 schrieb Damir Perisa: > so qt4 has as releasedependency pacman 3.1. this is good to know! > thank you! We'll see. Last year I thought pacman 3.1 is just about to be released. But it seems to be delayed. -- archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] dependency rebuilds

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Dec 30, 2007 11:37 PM, Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) the package y maintainer(s) notices package x in testing and rebuilds > package y > > 2) the package x maintainer(s) is responsible to find all packages y and > rebuilds all such packages y against the new package x There's a mi

Re: [arch-dev-public] qt4 timeframe? stoppers? breaks? anything in the wheels?

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 5:08 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 00:31:54 schrieb Damir Perisa: > > so qt4 has as releasedependency pacman 3.1. this is good to know! > > thank you! > > We'll see. Last year I thought pacman 3.1 is just about to be released. But it >

Re: [arch-dev-public] x264 depends / makedepends

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Dec 28, 2007 8:00 AM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arch]$ ./finddeps-echodir x264 > ./extra/multimedia/mplayer (depends) > ./extra/multimedia/avidemux (depends) > ./extra/multimedia/ffmpeg (depends) > ./extra/multimedia-plugins/gstreamer0.10-x264 (depends) > ./comm

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mozilla move from testing?

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Dec 29, 2007 5:23 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see the todo list for mozilla -> /usr move is completed. Do we have > any issues left here? I'd like to have it moved so I can update some > extra applications. I just want to follow up on this, because I didn't see any response.

Re: [arch-dev-public] qt4 timeframe? stoppers? breaks? anything in the wheels?

2008-01-03 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Freitag, 4. Januar 2008 00:38:55 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > I think one of the pending things is a german translation. Afaik Matthias is working on this. I'll ask him if there is still some work to do. > Also, > testing is always appreciated. Both of these things will help get > pacman out the

Re: [arch-dev-public] qt4 timeframe? stoppers? breaks? anything in the wheels?

2008-01-03 Thread Dan McGee
On Jan 3, 2008 6:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 4. Januar 2008 00:38:55 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > > I think one of the pending things is a german translation. > > Afaik Matthias is working on this. I'll ask him if there is still some work to > do. > > > Also, > > test

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] CVS update of extra/multimedia/miro (ChangeLog PKGBUILD)

2008-01-03 Thread Varun Acharya
On Jan 4, 2008 1:59 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 3:20 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thursday 03 January 2008, Travis Willard wrote: > > | On Jan 3, 2008 3:00 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > | > Thursday 03 January 2008, Va

Re: [arch-dev-public] qt4 timeframe? stoppers? breaks? anything in the wheels?

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 6:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 4. Januar 2008 00:38:55 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > > I think one of the pending things is a german translation. > > Afaik Matthias is working on this. I'll ask him if there is still some work to > do. > > > Also, > > test

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] CVS update of extra/multimedia/miro (ChangeLog PKGBUILD)

2008-01-03 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 3, 2008 7:20 PM, Varun Acharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out. I actually committed the ChangeLog by > accident, and looks like something good came out of it..I assume were > supposed to commit the ChangeLog now,( based on what travis had to say)? > I'll switch to

Re: [arch-dev-public] Updated perl 5.10.0

2008-01-03 Thread K. Piche
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 09:39 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Jan 2, 2008 8:10 PM, K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 07:11 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: > > > On Jan 2, 2008 1:34 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:16:19PM -0500, K.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Cleanup update (was: Third list of removal candidates)

2008-01-03 Thread Eric Belanger
Acting as a thread bump, here is the updated list: =Packages for which interest/concern has been shown or hardware-related pkg= apmd replaced by acpi (incorrect. needed for older machines) dmcradio Description: A ncurses-based console program for radio tuner cards. efax utiliti