On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:48:58PM +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
I could update it again. The reason for patching it during froscon was
that upstream azureus doesn't work with GNU java.
Why do we care? What's wrong with depending on Sun's java package?
Another thing was that
the jarfile
This is a problem in our current version of initscripts: If a package is
added in staging, but the PKGBUILD shows an older version, the package
and database data become inconsistent:
$ cat /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra/graphviz-2.16.1-3/desc
%FILENAME%
graphviz-2.18-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
%NAME%
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 02:12 -0500, Simo Leone wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:48:58PM +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
I could update it again. The reason for patching it during froscon was
that upstream azureus doesn't work with GNU java.
Why do we care? What's wrong with depending on Sun's
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 12:59 -0400, Eric Belanger wrote:
To get things going, I'll start some of these rebuilds. If you plan to
rebuild your package this week-end or if you have already rebuilt package
on your local machine and were waiting for the
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK.
I'm currently uploading all rebuilt packages to i686 testing except
xine-lib which doesn't compile on i686 (asm error). The x86_64 packages will
follow tonight or in the next few days.
Eric, you rule - I just
Same as 2.0-1, except:
rsync server configurable
rsyncd.conf.abs moved to /usr/share/abs
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Travis Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same as 2.0-1, except:
rsync server configurable
rsyncd.conf.abs moved to /usr/share/abs
Tried out 2.0-1 and it looked great, so if this is all that changed,
then I'll signoff on functionality.
One thought- what
7 matches
Mail list logo
