2008/7/1 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>>
>> I've attached output from the script run over an SVN checkout. I like
>> the svn repo structure - as you can see in the output, we can tell
>> which trunk PKGBUILDs are screwy, but also which ones in the repos are
>> screwy to
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
bind-9.5.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
perl-file-basedir-0.03-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
The following files are in the repo but not the db
They w
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
schrieb Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Any signoff for links on x86_64?
seems to work well here. so i give you a 64bit signoff.
-Andy
Thanks. FTR, gpm and the rebuilt packages have been moved to core/e
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Paul Mattal wrote:
Eric Belanger wrote:
Are there binaries available for x86_64? If not, that could be a problem.
Both are provided.
- P
In that case, no objections from me if that can make your job easier.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
Scan complete for core (i686) at /home/ftp/core/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
gpm-1.20.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
links-2.1pre36-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
vi-7.1.267-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Scan complete for core (x86_64) at /h
Am Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
schrieb Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Any signoff for links on x86_64?
>
seems to work well here. so i give you a 64bit signoff.
-Andy
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:31:35AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
Eric Belanger wrote:
gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bu
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
motion-3.2.10.1-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/
The following files are out of date
T
Scan complete for core (i686) at /home/ftp/core/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
sudo-1.6.9p16-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:31:35AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eric Belanger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
> >
> >> Eric Belanger wrote:
> >>>
> >>> gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bump (ChangeLog below)
> >>>
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eric Belanger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Belanger wrote:
gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bump (ChangeLog below)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> Eric Belanger wrote:
>>>
>>> gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bump (ChangeLog below)
>>>
>>
>> There is a report on the forums that gphoto2 also needs rebuilt against
Travis Willard wrote:
I've attached output from the script run over an SVN checkout. I like
the svn repo structure - as you can see in the output, we can tell
which trunk PKGBUILDs are screwy, but also which ones in the repos are
screwy too (ie. if someone updated the trunk PKGBUILD, but hasn't
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
tcl-8.5.2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
tk-8.5.2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/
The followin
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
digikam-0.9.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
exiv2-0.15-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
gimp-ufraw-0.13-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
gwenview-1.4.2-1-i686.pkg
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 23:11 -0500, Simo Leone wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:11:39PM -0400, Paul Mattal wrote:
> > Eric Belanger wrote:
> >> Are there binaries available for x86_64? If not, that could be a problem.
> >
> > Both are provided.
> >
>
> I thought eclipse was written in Java. Anyw
#exiv2 rebuild
digikam 0.9.3-2
exiv2 0.16-2
gimp-ufraw 0.13-2
gwenview 1.4.2-2
kipi-plugins 0.1.5beta1-3
libkexiv2 0.1.6-3
Any objection in moving the exiv2 stuff to extra? They've been in testing for
nearly 3 months with no bug reports.
FYI, I've moved them to extra.
#qt
lyx 1.5.5-1
li
2008/7/1 Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:11:39PM -0400, Paul Mattal wrote:
>> Eric Belanger wrote:
>>> Are there binaries available for x86_64? If not, that could be a problem.
>>
>> Both are provided.
>>
>
> I thought eclipse was written in Java.
Same here. :-P
The re
2008/7/1 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
>>
>>
>> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=84f76aafc5f6d7f3d2c2141d2930e42dcb82def0
>>
>> Additionally, it seems silly to c
Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
git-1.5.6-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
2008/6/30 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The following output is generated by the reporead.py script nightly.
> If you guys would like I can switch this to send to the list, but it
> may be a little spammy. I can always clean up the output a little, or
> possibly send it weekly. Opinions?
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
