Eric Belanger wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The changelog is below.
sudoedit / sudo working fine for me on i686, no exotic auth going on
here though.
-Dan
Any signoff for x86_64?
Thanks,
Eric
All i
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
libpng-1.2.28-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 21:28 -0400, Eduardo Romero wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 20:40 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Now we have a maintainer for wine again (thanks Eduardo, users were
> > complaining about wine constantly), I want to bring up a small issue:
> >
> > Running namcap on wine reve
Dusty Phillips wrote:
Eric Belanger wrote:
I just notice that a bunch of i686 packages are now showing up in the
web page "recent update list" but they weren't updated. also they all
got orphaned. What happened?
I'm quick to take blame for stuff, so I'm trying to figure out if my
one line
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 20:40 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Now we have a maintainer for wine again (thanks Eduardo, users were
> complaining about wine constantly), I want to bring up a small issue:
>
> Running namcap on wine reveals that there are lots of unnecessary
> dependencies. I also saw
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Alexander Fehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have adopted pidgin and pidgin-encryption that were mine.
They are both orphans now. :)
--
Hugo Doria
"Hugo Doria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I adopted some packages that were orphaned. I do not know if they were
> really orphan or not, but let me know if i got someone's package so i
> can give back.
You have adopted pidgin and pidgin-encryption that were mine.
Alex
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
amule-2.1.3-4.pkg.tar.gz
I noticed that too.
I adopted some packages that were orphaned. I do not know if they were
really orphan or not, but let me know if i got someone's package so i
can give back.
--
Hugo Doria
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 21:14:15 schrieb Eric Belanger:
> I just notice that a bunch of i686 packages are now showing up in the web
> page "recent update list" but they weren't updated. also they all got
> orphaned. What happened?
I lost some i686 package, too. And I cannot readopt them because s
Eric Belanger wrote:
I just notice that a bunch of i686 packages are now showing up in the
web page "recent update list" but they weren't updated. also they all
got orphaned. What happened?
I'm quick to take blame for stuff, so I'm trying to figure out if my one
line change to reporead.py c
Travis Willard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys.
I've been giving it some thought lately, and I think I need to sit
back and assess my priorities in life.
My day-
2008/7/4, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I just notice that a bunch of i686 packages are now showing up in the web
> page "recent update list" but they weren't updated. also they all got
> orphaned. What happened?
I just noticed that too.
I dunno.
--
Arch Linux Developer (voidnull)
AUR
I just notice that a bunch of i686 packages are now showing up in the web
page "recent update list" but they weren't updated. also they all got
orphaned. What happened?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
bzr-1.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
isapnptools-1.26-1.pkg.tar.gz
jdk-6u5-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
jre-6u5-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
lame
Now we have a maintainer for wine again (thanks Eduardo, users were
complaining about wine constantly), I want to bring up a small issue:
Running namcap on wine reveals that there are lots of unnecessary
dependencies. I also saw that some of the dependencies are possibly only
makedepends. Edua
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey guys.
>>
>> I've been giving it some thought lately, and I think I need to sit
>> back and assess my priorities in life.
>>
>> My day-job has
I can't test this, but if anyone can, please sign off (Damir, ping?).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Scan complete for core (i686) at /home/ftp/core/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
kernel26-2.6.25.6-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Scan complete for core (x86_64) at /home/ftp/core/os/x86_64/
The following files are out of date
The
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Paul Mattal wrote:
Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2
Roman Kyrylych schrieb:
2008/7/4 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2008/7/4 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 20:35:41 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is
built with gcc 4.3.1, so i
Hi guys,
I helped Jason in clearing all jre and jdk bugs, upgraded both packages
and I'm uploading both to extra as I write. Now, I just ask if somebody
can be so kind as to compile the x86_64 packages and upload them.
Thanks
Eduardo "kensai" Romero
2008/7/4 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>>
>> 2008/7/4 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 20:35:41 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>>>
Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is
built with gcc 4.3.1
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 00:37 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> > 2008/7/4 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 20:35:41 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> >>
> >>> Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is
> >>> built
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2008/7/4 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 20:35:41 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is
built with gcc 4.3.1, so if any binary modules break, please tell me.
everything
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 09:25:15AM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
>>> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Summary
> -
> Di
Paul Mattal wrote:
P
P.S. By the way, the interface won't let you do it, but you can do the
following-style URL to edit a todo:
https://dev.archlinux.org/todo/edit/1
There should be a 'Edit Todo List' link in the interface, up right of
the Todo list title. if you don't see this it may be
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Summary
-
Dirs with missing PKGBUILDs: 0
Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0
Missing (ma
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Summary
>>> -
>>> Dirs with missing PKGBUILDs: 0
>>> Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0
>>> Missing (make)dep
Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Paul Mattal
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Summary
-
Dirs with missing PKGBUILDs: 0
Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0
Missing (make)dependencies:8
Unmet provisioned (make)dependencies: 4
Circular dependencies
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Summary
> -
> Dirs with missing PKGBUILDs: 0
> Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0
> Missing (make)dependencies:8
> Unmet provisioned (make)dependencies: 4
> Circular dependencies:
2008/7/4 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 20:35:41 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is
>> built with gcc 4.3.1, so if any binary modules break, please tell me.
>
> everything seems fine on x86_64.
same h
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 20:35:41 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is
> built with gcc 4.3.1, so if any binary modules break, please tell me.
everything seems fine on x86_64.
--
http://www.archlinux.de
34 matches
Mail list logo
