2008/8/29 Andrea Scarpino [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/8/29 Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just a quick question for ya though - what is pacbuilder? Is it an
automated build tool?
Yes, pacbuilder is a tool to massively recompile archlinux packages from
sources
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 00:37 +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
Hi!
[preface]
As some of you may notice through pacman patches and bugspam
- I've _finally_ got issues sorted out and put my lazy ass in front of
my Arch box^W laptop.
So don't wonder if you'll get silly questions from me about the
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
Hi ML,
I'm trying to rebuild core repo with pacbuilder and I watched some
packages doesn't rebuild from PKGBUILD
packages list:
device-mapper: source tarball not found
Out of date, they delete old sources from the ftp.
iptables: make fail
Will look at that soon,
2008/8/29 Jan de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
German conspiracy...
gcc checks for a bug in the de_DE locale to see if it can enable
--clocale=gnu. Older versions of glibc have this bug. If de_DE is not
enabled, this check triggers the wrong result and --clocale=gnu is not
set.
:)
thanks for
2008/8/19 Pierre Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Like last year we'll attend the FrOSCon 2008. This Free and Open Source
Software Conference takes place in Sankt Augustin near Bonn/Germany at August
23rd and 24th.
Among lot of talks and lectures about free software, projects was given the
Version bump, untested by me, please sign off.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
hibernate-script-1.96-2.pkg.tar.gz
Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/
The following files are out of date
Now that our installer installs the whole base group by default, I'd
wish it would stick to the essential part. I suggest cleaning this up a bit:
Packages that IMO shouldn't be in base:
- dialog
Nothing depends on it, why do we even need it in core?
- hwdetect
Nothing uses it, we don't need
Hi all,
I have been told that not including the libncurses.so.5 library breaks
many, many, many binary blobs so I had to re-include that in the
ncurses package. Building on Arch will still link to the wide-character
libraries. It does now mean that the total rebuild was not necessary
but
So I took the time to update bluez to 4.1. The bluez-libs and
bluez-utils packages have been merged into the bluez package.
The SONAME has been bumped to libbluetooth.so.3 and the dbus interface
is incompatible to the one in bluez 3. bluez-gnome has been ported to
the new interface (didn't
The old script had several problems so I decided to do a full rewrite.
The improvements include :
* better and safer parsing of PKGBUILDs
It now uses separate parse_pkgbuilds.sh bash script (inspired from namcap)
* much better performance
A python module for calling vercmp natively, and the
2008/8/29 Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now that our installer installs the whole base group by default, I'd wish it
would stick to the essential part. I suggest cleaning this up a bit:
Packages that IMO shouldn't be in base:
. . .
agree.
We should also remove all packages from base
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
qt-doc-4.4.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:
So I took the time to update bluez to 4.1. The bluez-libs and bluez-utils
packages have been merged into the bluez package.
The SONAME has been bumped to libbluetooth.so.3 and the dbus interface is
incompatible to the one in bluez 3. bluez-gnome has
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:24 AM, James Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've let udev stagnate for a while, mostly because I'm a fool and
real life
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- dialog
Nothing depends on it, why do we even need it in core?
Don't we have tools in base which use dialog? The only ones I can
think of are the installer and netcfg.
- hwdetect
Nothing uses it, we don't need that in
Am Freitag 29 August 2008 12:27:50 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
- nano
Do we really need another editor in base? Let's leave it in core, remove
it from base.
This might end up in a flamwar, but if we have to remove one editor I would
vote vor vim and keep nano. vi is a lot more than a simple text
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
kde-l10n-bg-4.1.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
kde-l10n-ca-4.1.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
kde-l10n-cs-4.1.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:24 AM, James Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've let udev stagnate for a
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a bump here. I'd like to throw this in testing if someone else
can verify I didn't make machines unbootable. When this hit's testing,
it will require a rebuild of packages which contain udev rules (move
from
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried udev-126-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz. My machine still booted fine. The only
problem that I noticed is that the /dev/sg0 device that it creates for my
external USB DVD/CD-RW doesn't have the write permission for the optical
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:24 AM, James Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, /etc/start_udev refers to /sbin/udevtrigger and /sbin/udevsettle.
These binaries are missing in udev-126-2. If they were removed on purpose,
then start_udev should be updated.
start_udev is still there because people
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Pierre Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag 29 August 2008 12:27:50 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
- nano
Do we really need another editor in base? Let's leave it in core, remove
it from base.
This might end up in a flamwar, but if we have to remove one
24 matches
Mail list logo
