Re: [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Aaron Griffin schrieb: Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to testing. I hope I can make the changes to load-modules.sh soon to make blacklisting work in a reasonable way. See http://bugs.arc

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 04-09-2008 09:00

2008-09-04 Thread repomaint
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup gmoo-0.5.6-2.pkg.tar.gz

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in inkscape/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2008-09-04 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Mittwoch 03 September 2008 20:05:56 schrieb Giovanni Scafora: > -    --without-gnome-vfs || return 1 > +    --with-gnome-vfs || return 1 Do we really need to add dependencies to gnome to inkscape? -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil

Re: [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: >> >> Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes >> I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to >> testing. > > I hope I can make the changes to l

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 04-09-2008 12:00

2008-09-04 Thread repomaint
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup clamav-0.93.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz spamassassin-3.2.4-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz spamassassin-3.2.5-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz spamassassin-s

Re: [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread Dusty Phillips
2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Aaron Griffin schrieb: >>> >>> Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes >>> I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in inkscape/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2008-09-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2008/9/4, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Do we really need to add dependencies to gnome to inkscape? Yes. I've added that gnome-vfs dependence and that support --with-gnome-vfs to avoid crashes importing a PDF file. Without it, inkscape crashes when importing a PDF file. -- Arch Linux D

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in inkscape/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2008-09-04 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Giovanni Scafora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/4, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Do we really need to add dependencies to gnome to inkscape? > > Yes. > I've added that gnome-vfs dependence and that support --with-gnome-vfs > to avoid crashes importing

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in inkscape/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2008-09-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2008/9/4, Ronald van Haren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > is this normal behavior? It might be worth to see if there is a patch > around, if it is an easy fix try to write it ourselves, but at least > file a bug report (if there is none already). > I think a lot of people would rather loose the dependen

Re: [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Donnerstag 04 September 2008 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: > > Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes > > I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to > > testing. > > I hope I can make the changes to load-modules.sh soo

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in inkscape/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2008-09-04 Thread Jan de Groot
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 18:39 +0200, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2008/9/4, Ronald van Haren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > is this normal behavior? It might be worth to see if there is a patch > > around, if it is an easy fix try to write it ourselves, but at least > > file a bug report (if there is none a

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in inkscape/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2008-09-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2008/9/4, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > gnome-vfs's dependency tree is quite big though: > fam gconf hal bzip2 avahi smbclient gnome-mime-data heimdal gnutls > orbit2 policykit libidl2 OK, then I change --with-gnome-vfs to --without-gnome-vfs and I remove gnome-vfs as dependence. -- Arc

Re: [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Aaron Griffin schrieb: Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the c

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in inkscape/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2008-09-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2008/9/4, Giovanni Scafora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OK, then I change --with-gnome-vfs to --without-gnome-vfs and I remove > gnome-vfs as dependence. Done. -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR & Pacman Italian Translations Microdia Developer http://www.archlinux.it

Re: [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like this explaination a little better than "our rules are stock > too", but I'm still undecided. I'd be interested in hearing some other > opinions here... Dan, you usually have good input... opinion? Without completely

Re: [arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addendum

2008-09-04 Thread Dusty Phillips
2008/9/2 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Another alternative: >> >> - Create a web based interface to allow community users to signoff on >> packages. We could have a policy of X number of user signoffs is equal >>

Re: [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I like this explaination a little better than "our rules are stock >> too", but I'm still undecided. I'd be interested in hearing some other >> opinions

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 04-09-2008 15:00

2008-09-04 Thread repomaint
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup inkscape-0.46-6-i686.pkg.tar.gz

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 05-09-2008 00:00

2008-09-04 Thread repomaint
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup monotone-0.40-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz pyrex-0.9.8.4-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/ The

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.5RC6 enters testing

2008-09-04 Thread Dan McGee
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xorg-server 1.5RC6 (1.4.99.906) enters tesing. This version of > xorg-server includes input hotplugging using hal, better EXA support and > less memory usage. > Note that this version requires an upgrade of all videodrivers.

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64

2008-09-04 Thread repomaint
Warning: Ensure your ABS tree is clean to prevent false positives. == = x86_64 Integrity Check = == Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking archs ==> checking for circular

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686

2008-09-04 Thread repomaint
Warning: Ensure your ABS tree is clean to prevent false positives. = i686 Integrity Check = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking archs ==> checking for circular depend