Re: [arch-dev-public] Add texinfo in base group?

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I just want to point out FS#11501. Basically, as we are now adding info pages to packages, we are using a .install file which runs install-info. This tool is part of texinf

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libgcrypt 1.4.3-1

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Andreas Radke wrote: please signoff both arches. should also fix http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11525 -Andy there's a missing depends on texinfo. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] gmp 4.2.3-1, mpfr 2.3.2-1

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Allan McRae wrote: Jan de Groot wrote: Please signoff for both architectures. I can still build the latest gcc-4.4 snapshot so sign-off for i686. Allan There's a missing depends on texinfo. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by Mail

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add texinfo in base group?

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just want to point out FS#11501. Basically, as we are now adding info > pages to packages, we are using a .install file which runs install-info. > This tool is part of texinfo. Therefore we should either add a d

Re: [arch-dev-public] Let's use the Maintainer tag

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Additionally, if parsing shell scripts is the issue here, why not add > some new metainfo: > maintainer="Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > Seems ok to me. We could even start doing it right now, as makepkg > will just

Re: [arch-dev-public] Let's use the Maintainer tag

On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/9/20 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Hey devs, >>> >>> I think our current method of organizing maintainership of packages is not >>> op

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] gmp 4.2.3-1, mpfr 2.3.2-1

Jan de Groot wrote: Please signoff for both architectures. I can still build the latest gcc-4.4 snapshot so sign-off for i686. Allan

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 21-09-2008 18:00

Scan complete for core (x86_64) at /home/ftp/core/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup xfsprogs-2.9.8-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ifenslave

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Dan McGee wrote: Just minor updates- grabbed the newest code from upstream (a one line casting fix, nothing serious) and updated the upstream URL. I also moved the source into our FTP other directory, so Tobias, this no longer needs to be there: http://www.archlinux.org/~tp

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add texinfo in base group?

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Dan McGee wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I just want to point out FS#11501. Basically, as we are now adding info pages to packages, we are using a .install file which runs install-info. This tool is part of texinfo. T

Re: [arch-dev-public] boost

K. Piche schrieb: All, I thought I had moved boost 1.36.0 to testing already, sorry. I'll be sending uploading it after I work out some SVN conflicts. k This patch is still missing: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/1615/0001-date_time-gcc-4.3-fix.patch signature.asc Des

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 21-09-2008 12:00

Scan complete for core (i686) at /home/ftp/core/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup hwdetect-0.9.1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz openssl-0.9.8h-4-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for core (x86_64) at /home/ftp/core/os/x86_64/ The f

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add texinfo in base group?

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just want to point out FS#11501. Basically, as we are now adding info > pages to packages, we are using a .install file which runs install-info. > This tool is part of texinfo. Therefore we should either add a d

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] ifenslave

Just minor updates- grabbed the newest code from upstream (a one line casting fix, nothing serious) and updated the upstream URL. I also moved the source into our FTP other directory, so Tobias, this no longer needs to be there: http://www.archlinux.org/~tpowa/ifenslave/ -Dan

Re: [arch-dev-public] inputproto - required by differs between archs

On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 14:19 +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > Hi! > > This is what I've got today: > > $ pacman -Qtd > bigreqsproto 1.0.2-1 > ffmpeg 20080715-3 > inputproto 1.4.4-1 > libburn 0.5.2-1 > inplibisofs 0.6.6-1 > unzip 5.52-4 > > inputproto is required by xextproto on i686, but not on x86

[arch-dev-public] Patching Flyspray is needed

Hi again, looks like I have mailday today :P I've noticed that someone updated Flyspray to the latest version (haven't checked if "SQL error when searching" bug is fixed yet) but it's needed to be patched every time after update: "Operating System" should be replaced with "Architecture" everywhere

Re: [arch-dev-public] inputproto - required by differs between archs

2008/9/21 Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi! > > This is what I've got today: > > $ pacman -Qtd > bigreqsproto 1.0.2-1 > ffmpeg 20080715-3 > inputproto 1.4.4-1 > libburn 0.5.2-1 > inplibisofs 0.6.6-1 > unzip 5.52-4 > > inputproto is required by xextproto on i686, but not on x86_64 :-/ > > bi

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8i-1

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag 19 September 2008 15:51:08 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: >> Am Montag 15 September 2008 19:28:28 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: >> > Changes between 0.9.8h and 0.9.8i [15 Sep 2008] >> >> ...just a reminder to test this pac

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 21-09-2008 09:00

Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup wxmaxima-0.7.5-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date Th

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8i-1

Am Sonntag 21 September 2008 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > Am Freitag 19 September 2008 15:51:08 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > > Am Montag 15 September 2008 19:28:28 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > > >  Changes between 0.9.8h and 0.9.8i  [15 Sep 2008] > > > > ...just a reminder to test this package and sign-off.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2008.09-1

2008/9/18 Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thomas Bächler schrieb: >> >> Fixes bug http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9739, No other changes (except a >> comment removed). Please sign off. >> > > And another one, forgot to fix a trivial bug related to functions.d. Sign > off again. > > The follow

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8i-1

Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Freitag 19 September 2008 15:51:08 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Am Montag 15 September 2008 19:28:28 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Changes between 0.9.8h and 0.9.8i [15 Sep 2008] ...just a reminder to test this package and sign-off. Could please someone te

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] udev-128-5

Hi added a small fix to not break installation systems, please signoff both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8i-1

Am Freitag 19 September 2008 15:51:08 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > Am Montag 15 September 2008 19:28:28 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > >  Changes between 0.9.8h and 0.9.8i  [15 Sep 2008] > > ...just a reminder to test this package and sign-off. Could please someone tell me if ssl is still working? People

[arch-dev-public] devtools: double slashes in mkarchroot

Hi all! Got to chrooting today, to get my packaging process correct. Here's what I've got: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# echo $CHROOT_SHELL /chroot64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkarchroot $CHROOT_SHELL/root base base-devel sudo mounting sysfs : /sys mounting procfs : /proc binding device nodes : /dev binding

Re: [arch-dev-public] inputproto - required by differs between archs

2008/9/21 Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi! > > This is what I've got today: > > $ pacman -Qtd > inplibisofs 0.6.6-1 Doh! How can I turn off touchpad when mouse is plugged? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

[arch-dev-public] inputproto - required by differs between archs

Hi! This is what I've got today: $ pacman -Qtd bigreqsproto 1.0.2-1 ffmpeg 20080715-3 inputproto 1.4.4-1 libburn 0.5.2-1 inplibisofs 0.6.6-1 unzip 5.52-4 inputproto is required by xextproto on i686, but not on x86_64 :-/ bigreqsproto is not required by anything now. Is it safe to remove? -- R

Re: [arch-dev-public] Demise of the dev wiki

2008/9/18 Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Second, I need people to move pages they don't want to disappear to >> the mediawiki, whether for archival or for future reference purposes. >> If you don't have time fo

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add texinfo in base group?

Eric Belanger schrieb: BTW, texinfo provides its own info pages. Currently these files are included in the package but there's no .install script. If I add a script, then technically, it'll need to depend on itself. I'm thinking that it might cause problems for users who are installing it for t

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 21-09-2008 03:00

Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup imagemagick-6.4.2.10-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date