Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] cracklib 2.8.13-2

2009-03-25 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Hugo Doria wrote: > Added zlib as dependency (FS#13798) > > -- Hugo > FYI, I've build the x86_64 package.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8k-1 (security bug fix)

2009-03-25 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> >> This update fixes some security issues in openssl. See: >> http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20090325.txt >> >> Please sign-off. >> > > Everything appear to still work here.  Signoff i686. > > Allan > > > Same here

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] dash 0.5.5.1-2

2009-03-25 Thread Allan McRae
Dan McGee wrote: Sorry for the huge delay here, but dash 0.5.5.1-2 is now in [testing] for both architectures with gzipped man pages. Please signoff. Signoff i686.. Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8k-1 (security bug fix)

2009-03-25 Thread Allan McRae
Pierre Schmitz wrote: This update fixes some security issues in openssl. See: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20090325.txt Please sign-off. Everything appear to still work here. Signoff i686. Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 / "mv" segfault

2009-03-25 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Status update: aufs is a real bitch and is not working now, Thomas will look at it on weekend. Buidling now a fixed kernel with working network subsystem, tomorrow morning network should work again as it should. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpow

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8k-1 (security bug fix)

2009-03-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
This update fixes some security issues in openssl. See: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20090325.txt Please sign-off. -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pie...@jabber.archlinux.de WWW

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 / "mv" segfault

2009-03-25 Thread Andreas Radke
more issues here with file system operations also my 32bit chroot. [andy...@workstation64 tmp]$ touch foo [andy...@workstation64 tmp]$ mv foo foo1 [andy...@workstation64 tmp]$ mv foo1 ~/sources/ mv: listing attributes of „foo1“: Das Argument ist ungültig [andy...@workstation64 tmp]$ mv foo1 ~/sour

[arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 / "mv" segfault

2009-03-25 Thread Andreas Radke
. [andy...@workstation64 trunk]$ mv xf86-video-nouveau-20090325.tar.bz2 ~/sources/ Speicherzugriffsfehler [andy...@workstation64 trunk]$ [andy...@workstation64 trunk]$ ls -lh ~/sources/xf86-video-nouveau-20090325.tar.bz2* -rw--- 1 andyrtr users 168K 25. Mär 17:15 /home/andyrtr/sources/xf

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Douglas Soares de Andrade
Em Quarta-feira 25 Março 2009, às 12:13:34, Pierre Schmitz escreveu: > Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 15:50:06 schrieb Jan de Groot: > > Is skip-innodb no longer compatible? Weird, I remember having that > > option on one of our databaseservers. Are you sure this mysql is built > > with innodb support?

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Douglas Soares de Andrade
Em Quarta-feira 25 Março 2009, às 12:13:34, Pierre Schmitz escreveu: > Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 15:50:06 schrieb Jan de Groot: > > Is skip-innodb no longer compatible? Weird, I remember having that > > option on one of our databaseservers. Are you sure this mysql is built > > with innodb support?

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Douglas Soares de Andrade
Em Quarta-feira 25 Março 2009, às 12:13:34, Pierre Schmitz escreveu: > Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 15:50:06 schrieb Jan de Groot: > > Is skip-innodb no longer compatible? Weird, I remember having that > > option on one of our databaseservers. Are you sure this mysql is built > > with innodb support?

Re: [arch-dev-public] TODO list for exiv2 update

2009-03-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Montag, 23. März 2009 16:50:52 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > If noone does it earlier I'll bump the lib with the upcoming KDE release. I just started the rebuild; I'll commit exiv2, strigi and kdegraphics when KDE 4.2.2 is out. -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Daniel Isenmann
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:27:45 +0100 Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 11:47:08 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > > It seems the 2.6.29 kernel has a network issue, which will be fixed > > in .29.1 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/811417 > > At the moment keep an downgrade ker

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 11:47:08 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > It seems the 2.6.29 kernel has a network issue, which will be fixed in > .29.1 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/811417 > At the moment keep an downgrade kernel in your cache if you will be > affected by this bug. I want to

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Mittwoch 25 März 2009 schrieb Allan McRae: >> Daniel Isenmann wrote: >> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:47:08 +0100 >> > >> > Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Changes: >> >> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges >> >> >> >> added this

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Jan de Groot
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:13 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 15:50:06 schrieb Jan de Groot: > > Is skip-innodb no longer compatible? Weird, I remember having that > > option on one of our databaseservers. Are you sure this mysql is built > > with innodb support? > > Not su

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 15:50:06 schrieb Jan de Groot: > Is skip-innodb no longer compatible? Weird, I remember having that > option on one of our databaseservers. Are you sure this mysql is built > with innodb support? Not sure but it seems innodb is no longer supported. I can only create myis

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Jan de Groot
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:47 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Well, after removing the following config entries I was able to start > mysqld > and run mysql_upgrade. > > #skip-innodb > #skip-bdb > #skip-federated > > However: I think we'll need some kind of upgrade guide. Especially > intersting

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 15:36:30 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 12:28:25 schrieb Douglas Soares de Andrade: > > Hi guys, > > > > Finnaly i took some time and updated mysql to testing. I did almost all > > the needed rebuilds - i did not rebuilt dovecot as it needs the new >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 12:28:25 schrieb Douglas Soares de Andrade: > Hi guys, > > Finnaly i took some time and updated mysql to testing. I did almost all the > needed rebuilds - i did not rebuilt dovecot as it needs the new libpcap, > can someone build it for me ? - Im also uploading mysql-gui-

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mailx-8.1.1-6

2009-03-25 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Dale Blount wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:33 -0300, Hugo Doria wrote: >> >>> >>> Just a quick question: why do we have mailx on core? AFIK mailx is not >>> required by any of the packages from core. >>> >> >> syslog maybe?  not directly

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mailx-8.1.1-6

2009-03-25 Thread Allan McRae
Dale Blount wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:33 -0300, Hugo Doria wrote: Just a quick question: why do we have mailx on core? AFIK mailx is not required by any of the packages from core. syslog maybe? not directly required, however. Dale AFAIK, it is required by the FHS. Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mailx-8.1.1-6

2009-03-25 Thread Dale Blount
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:33 -0300, Hugo Doria wrote: > Just a quick question: why do we have mailx on core? AFIK mailx is not > required by any of the packages from core. syslog maybe? not directly required, however. Dale

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mailx-8.1.1-6

2009-03-25 Thread Hugo Doria
Just a quick question: why do we have mailx on core? AFIK mailx is not required by any of the packages from core. -- Hugo

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Tobias Powalowski schrieb: broken binary modules: - aufs - lirc Please maintainers of those packages fix those. http://aufs.sourceforge.net/README.aufs2 Again about aufs: I have no idea if this is supposed to be built in-kernel, but the patches to the VFS seem to be minimal and I guess we can

[arch-dev-public] freetype2 with a static lib?

2009-03-25 Thread Vesa Kaihlavirta
I got interested in this for some reason a couple of months ago: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11016 "Doing a static x86_64 build of freetype increases the size of the tarball by 333KB (72% increase) and installed size by 824KB (47%)." Is that too much? All we need is remove --disable-static fro

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Allan McRae schrieb: Apart from the FPS in games going from ~50 to ~10, I have no issues (with an Intel 945GM). Going to try KMS but I haven't had much success with that during the RC stage... I have the same chipset, and with 2.6.29-rc8, compositing in KDE was unusable (with 2.6.28, intel 2

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Douglas Soares de Andrade
Em Quarta-feira 25 Março 2009, às 08:41:13, Allan McRae escreveu: > Allan McRae wrote: > > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 21:28:15 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > >>> Thanks, but it does not build: > >> > >> Well, the last update solved the problem. > > > > FYI, this is the comple

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Jan de Groot
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 21:31 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Apart from the FPS in games going from ~50 to ~10, I have no issues > (with an Intel 945GM). Going to try KMS but I haven't had much > success > with that during the RC stage... Enabling KMS makes performance a bit better, though according

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Mittwoch 25 März 2009 schrieb Allan McRae: > Daniel Isenmann wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:47:08 +0100 > > > > Tobias Powalowski wrote: > >> Hi > >> Changes: > >> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > >> > >> added this request: > >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13486 > >> > >> broken b

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Allan McRae
Allan McRae wrote: Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 21:28:15 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Thanks, but it does not build: Well, the last update solved the problem. FYI, this is the complete rebuild list for the libmysqlclient soname bumps: Or just the remaining r

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Douglas Soares de Andrade
Em Quarta-feira 25 Março 2009, às 08:35:04, Allan McRae escreveu: > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 21:28:15 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > >> Thanks, but it does not build: > > > > Well, the last update solved the problem. > > FYI, this is the complete rebuild list for the libmysq

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Allan McRae
Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 21:28:15 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Thanks, but it does not build: Well, the last update solved the problem. FYI, this is the complete rebuild list for the libmysqlclient soname bumps: amarok-base courier-authlib cyrus-sasl-plugins

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Allan McRae
Daniel Isenmann wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:47:08 +0100 Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi Changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges added this request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13486 broken binary modules: - aufs - lirc Please maintainers of those packages fix those. It seems the

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Daniel Isenmann
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:47:08 +0100 Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > Changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > added this request: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13486 > > broken binary modules: > - aufs > - lirc > Please maintainers of those packages fix those. > > It seems the 2.6

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Tobias Powalowski schrieb: added this request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13486 I thought we said that we only add smack if we can compile it =m (which we couldn't). broken binary modules: - aufs - lirc Please maintainers of those packages fix those. Are we still adding these weird au

[arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

2009-03-25 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi Changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges added this request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13486 broken binary modules: - aufs - lirc Please maintainers of those packages fix those. It seems the 2.6.29 kernel has a network issue, which will be fixed in .29.1 http://article.gmane.org/gm

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mysql update

2009-03-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 21:28:15 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > Thanks, but it does not build: Well, the last update solved the problem. -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pie...@jabber.archlinux.de W

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.6.2

2009-03-25 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Dan McGee wrote: >> >> In testing for both architectures. Please signoff. bsdtar working >> and/or pacman still working are good tests. >> > > Sign-off i686. > > Allan > > > > signoff x86_64 Ronald

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.6.2

2009-03-25 Thread Allan McRae
Dan McGee wrote: In testing for both architectures. Please signoff. bsdtar working and/or pacman still working are good tests. Sign-off i686. Allan