Aaron Griffin wrote:
I specifically told you guys that we were NOT dropping the i686 port,
and you guys went and voted on it without me? This is the last straw.
If you guys don't fix this now, consider this my last email.
Aaron - this is the PUBLIC list :o
T.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> Allan McRae wrote:
Added cvs optdep for autopoint
Install script for info pages.
>>>
>>> Edit: gettext-0.17-3..
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:30 PM, pyther wrote:
I was wondering if we could make arch-announce a read only list. Sort of
like the dev mailing list. Anyone who tries to respond to an announcement
could get an email saying something along the lines of "If you have a
comment
I strongly resent this decision and think it might not be valid anyway
because it didn't go through the official developer voting procedures.
Or was this one of those inner circle votes? Why didn't you let us new
devs vote on this?
--vk (vegai)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:20:37PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I specifically told you guys that we were NOT dropping the i686 port,
> and you guys went and voted on it without me? This is the last straw.
> If you guys don't fix this now, consider this my last email.
You're welcome to fork and m
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Signoff for xinetd-2.3.14-5
> - License rebuild
> - Fix man page location
> - Add optdepends on perl (xconv.pl script)
>
> I needs someone to build for x86_64.
>
> Allan
>
Tested with xinet-using telnet server. Signoff both arches.
Eric
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Added smtp-forwarder as optdepends to fix FS#4812.
>
> I do not use so no default sign-off from me...
>
> Allan
>
>
-BSD license is missing
- Non-FHS man pages
- Perhaps adding etc/mail.rc in backup array
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> Added cvs optdep for autopoint
>>> Install script for info pages.
>>
>> Edit: gettext-0.17-3...
>
> Not extensively tested but I haven't noticed any problems
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> Added cvs optdep for autopoint
>> Install script for info pages.
>
> Edit: gettext-0.17-3...
>
>
>
>
Not extensively tested but I haven't noticed any problems. signoff both arches.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Hi
>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10651
>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9122
>> both states raid is broken for more complex setups.
>>
>> According to my earlier mail about a
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Fixes the RPATH issue:
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13891
>
>
>
>
>
I haven't noticed any problems. signoff both arches.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Ronald van Haren wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Removed mawk replaces (FS#12430), added info files
>>>
>>> Allan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Please remove the 'mv'-lines from the PKGBUILD, you can replace
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10651
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9122
> both states raid is broken for more complex setups.
>
> According to my earlier mail about assembling raid arrays i wrote a new hook
> and install file.
> I
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>> In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
>>
>> Ronald
>>
>
> Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one.
>
> Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3:
> iptables-save: mino
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:30 PM, pyther wrote:
>
> I was wondering if we could make arch-announce a read only list. Sort of
> like the dev mailing list. Anyone who tries to respond to an announcement
> could get an email saying something along the lines of "If you have a
> comment about an announc
I specifically told you guys that we were NOT dropping the i686 port,
and you guys went and voted on it without me? This is the last straw.
If you guys don't fix this now, consider this my last email.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Dusty Phillips wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I know we all agreed to drop i686 support, but it leaves me with a
> small problem -- I'm one of the few devs not yet blessed with a 64 bit
> machine. I was thinking maybe we could use the donation funding to buy
> x86_64 build
Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Dusty Phillips wrote:
Hey guys,
I know we all agreed to drop i686 support, but it leaves me with a
small problem -- I'm one of the few devs not yet blessed with a 64 bit
machine. I was thinking maybe we could use the donation funding to buy
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Dusty Phillips wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I know we all agreed to drop i686 support, but it leaves me with a
> small problem -- I'm one of the few devs not yet blessed with a 64 bit
> machine. I was thinking maybe we could use the donation funding to buy
> x86_64 build
Hey guys,
I know we all agreed to drop i686 support, but it leaves me with a
small problem -- I'm one of the few devs not yet blessed with a 64 bit
machine. I was thinking maybe we could use the donation funding to buy
x86_64 build boxes for each of us. We've got a lot of donation funding
and the
Am Montag, 30. März 2009 12:32:32 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Am Samstag, 21. März 2009 15:25:37 schrieb Allan McRae:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made an internal TODO list for the exiv2 update that is waiting which
> > will have a soname bump.
> >
> > Not that I intend to do this... but helpful for whoever do
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:01:58 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
> > Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:06:39 +1000
> >> Allan McRae wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> As noted in FS#14038, the permissions of the ABS tree in the
> >>> rsync server were not as they
Allan McRae wrote:
Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:06:39 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
As noted in FS#14038, the permissions of the ABS tree in the rsync
server were not as they should be. This abs release adjusts the
rsync command so that permissions are not copied. I als
Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:06:39 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
As noted in FS#14038, the permissions of the ABS tree in the rsync
server were not as they should be. This abs release adjusts the
rsync command so that permissions are not copied. I also added an
install
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:06:39 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As noted in FS#14038, the permissions of the ABS tree in the rsync
> server were not as they should be. This abs release adjusts the
> rsync command so that permissions are not copied. I also added an
> install script to attempt
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Montag, 30. März 2009 19:51:26 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
>> Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 12:28:25 schrieb Douglas Soares de Andrade:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > Finnaly i took some time and updated mysql to testing. I did almost all
>> > the need
Am Montag, 30. März 2009 19:51:26 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 12:28:25 schrieb Douglas Soares de Andrade:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Finnaly i took some time and updated mysql to testing. I did almost all
> > the needed rebuilds - i did not rebuilt dovecot as it needs the new
> >
Hi,
As noted in FS#14038, the permissions of the ABS tree in the rsync
server were not as they should be. This abs release adjusts the rsync
command so that permissions are not copied. I also added an install
script to attempt to correct the permissions in peoples ABS trees.
I would like a
28 matches
Mail list logo
