Re: [arch-dev-public] License rebuild: last step

2009-05-03 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Eric Bélanger wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> The license rebuild for core/extra is almost done. Only a few >> problematic packages remains. I'll post the list here with potential >> solutions. Read along and comment/discuss as apropriate. >> > > First up

Re: [arch-dev-public] License rebuild: last step

2009-05-03 Thread Allan McRae
Eric Bélanger wrote: Hi The license rebuild for core/extra is almost done. Only a few problematic packages remains. I'll post the list here with potential solutions. Read along and comment/discuss as apropriate. First up, a big cheer for Eric here! He has done a lot of work to get this fi

Re: [arch-dev-public] ffmpeg and x264 update/rebuild in testing

2009-05-03 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Eric Bélanger > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just put an updated ffmpeg and x264 in testing. I've updated >> ffmpeg to the latest stable version (0.5) that was released recently >> and x264 was updated to the l

Re: [arch-dev-public] Removing termcap-compat

2009-05-03 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Hi all, > > A bug report from Eric reminded me about termcap-compat sitting in the > repos.  Everything (apart from the community package in that bug report) > appears to have been rebuilt as to not depend on it now, so I will remove it > from

[arch-dev-public] License rebuild: last step

2009-05-03 Thread Eric Bélanger
Hi The license rebuild for core/extra is almost done. Only a few problematic packages remains. I'll post the list here with potential solutions. Read along and comment/discuss as apropriate. ccaudio: - doesn't build. no package depends on it. Remove? codecs: emovix-codecs: - There is no license

[arch-dev-public] [sigoff] coreutils-7.3

2009-05-03 Thread Allan McRae
Upstream changelog: * Noteworthy changes in release 7.3 (2009-05-01) [stable] ** Bug fixes cp now diagnoses failure to preserve selinux/xattr attributes when --preserve=context,xattr is specified in combination with -a. Also, cp no longer suppresses attribute-preservation diagnostics when p

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] file-5.01

2009-05-03 Thread Allan McRae
Upstream bug fix release. * Fix more cdf lossage. All the documents I have right now print the correct information. * don't print \012- separators in the same magic entry if it consists of multiple magic printing lines. * Avoid file descriptor leak in compress code from (Daniel Novotny) * Al

[arch-dev-public] Removing termcap-compat

2009-05-03 Thread Allan McRae
Hi all, A bug report from Eric reminded me about termcap-compat sitting in the repos. Everything (apart from the community package in that bug report) appears to have been rebuilt as to not depend on it now, so I will remove it from the repo. I take it that there are no objections? Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] usbutils 0.81-1

2009-05-03 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. > > greetings > tpowa > -- > Tobias Powalowski > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > http://www.archlinux.org > tp...@archlinux.org signing off both arches Er

[arch-dev-public] new package: libusb1

2009-05-03 Thread Jan de Groot
I've added libusb1 1.0.0 to the repositories. It's a rewrite of the old libusb 0.1.x package we have in core at this moment. As it's a rewrite, and not source or binary compatible, I decided to rename the package for now. Until every application in the repositories has been ported to the 1.0 versio

[arch-dev-public] libraw1394 rebuilds

2009-05-03 Thread Jan de Groot
I'm pusing libraw1394 to testing. This release has a sobump and requires rebuild of some packages. I've done most packages, but vlc and kdebase are also on this list. Both packages are in testing at this moment, without versioned dependencies, so I don't plan to rebuild these myself. Please rebuild

Re: [arch-dev-public] Cannot login on flyspray

2009-05-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
works now On 03/05/2009, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > I get this when I try to login: > > Error #23: User or group not enabled for login. > > What's up? > > -- > Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer > -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] Cannot login on flyspray

2009-05-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
I get this when I try to login: Error #23: User or group not enabled for login. What's up? -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] usbutils 0.81-1

2009-05-03 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] findutils 4.4.1-1

2009-05-03 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] jfsutils 1.1.14-1

2009-05-03 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft

2009-05-03 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 05:38, Jan de Groot wrote: > Might think about it yes, but actually don't include it. > Even upstream has discussion about if this is the right thing to do. > This thing is targeted at companies using linux in their embedded > devices so they won't have a chance of getting s

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sysvinit-2.86-5

2009-05-03 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Freitag, 1. Mai 2009 04:45:14 schrieb Eric Bélanger: > Please test and signoff. Did not notice any problem; signed-off both arches -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pie...@jabber.archlinux.de WW

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.7.0

2009-05-03 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Samstag, 2. Mai 2009 02:59:57 schrieb Dan McGee: > In testing for both architectures. Use bsdtar and/or pacman to test. signed-off both arches -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pie...@jabber.arc

Re: [arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft

2009-05-03 Thread Daniel Isenmann
On Sun, 3 May 2009 10:12:03 +0200 Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:59:37 +0200 (CEST) > schrieb Andreas Radke : > > > http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom-settlement-microsoft-rolls-back-its-%E2%80%9Copen%E2%80%9D-promises/ > > > > I haven't done

Re: [arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft

2009-05-03 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 10:12 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:59:37 +0200 (CEST) > schrieb Andreas Radke : > > > http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom-settlement-microsoft-rolls-back-its-%E2%80%9Copen%E2%80%9D-promises/ > > > > I haven't done f

Re: [arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft

2009-05-03 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Sonntag 03 Mai 2009 schrieb Andreas Radke: > Am Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:59:37 +0200 (CEST) > > schrieb Andreas Radke : > > http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom- > >settlement-microsoft-rolls-back-its-%E2%80%9Copen%E2%80%9D-promises/ > > > > I haven't done further i

Re: [arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft

2009-05-03 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:59:37 +0200 (CEST) schrieb Andreas Radke : > http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom-settlement-microsoft-rolls-back-its-%E2%80%9Copen%E2%80%9D-promises/ > > I haven't done further investigations but it seems we should take care > about keep