Re: [arch-dev-public] Mirrors supporting rsync

2009-08-26 Thread Dusty Phillips
> iinet is similarly awesome. They're presently being sued for allowing > bittorrent traffic of copyrighted material. They're sticking up for > our consumer rights rather than caving and settling with the media > companies. Must be nice to have a choice of ISPs and some of them are good ones. Here

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mirrors supporting rsync

2009-08-26 Thread Allan McRae
James Rayner wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote: Below is a list of our current mirrors that support rsync. I would like to begin the process of setting up Tiered mirroring to give gerolde some breathing room. Mirrors supporting rsync: 26 aarnet.edu.au i

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mirrors supporting rsync

2009-08-26 Thread James Rayner
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Below is a list of our current mirrors that support rsync. I would > like to begin the process of setting up Tiered mirroring to give > gerolde some breathing room. > > Mirrors supporting rsync: 26 >        aarnet.edu.au >        iinet.net.au >

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: >> >> We can. squashfs-lzma is a significant improvement, but it can't be >> built out of tree, I don't think (last I checked was a while ago, this >> may have changed) > > It has been discontinued when squashfs was mer

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Aaron Griffin schrieb: We can. squashfs-lzma is a significant improvement, but it can't be built out of tree, I don't think (last I checked was a while ago, this may have changed) It has been discontinued when squashfs was merged into the kernel. Now lzma is also merged into the kernel, but ne

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Andreas Radke schrieb: >>> >>> I can boot my ext4 / filesystem with a clean dmesg :) >>> >>> I don't care if I will maintain it in core or extra with additional >>> signoff. Maybe our I

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Andreas Radke schrieb: >> >> I can boot my ext4 / filesystem with a clean dmesg :) >> >> I don't care if I will maintain it in core or extra with additional >> signoff. Maybe our ISO makers should say if they have enough space for >> this ker

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Andreas Radke schrieb: I can boot my ext4 / filesystem with a clean dmesg :) I don't care if I will maintain it in core or extra with additional signoff. Maybe our ISO makers should say if they have enough space for this kernel for both arches in core or if they would like to put it manually as

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:00:11 +0200 schrieb Firmicus : > Dale Blount a écrit : > >> I don't think that it needs to go in core to get signoffs. We > >> could put it in extra and make an exception (i.e. require > >> signoff). The only advantage of putting it in core is to offer it > >> as an altern

Re: [arch-dev-public] [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Implement a hook-system that allows to add custom code to the initscripts at certain places]

2009-08-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
I changed the hook system again, documentation is still in rc.d/functions. Testing it a bit now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Firmicus
Dale Blount a écrit : >> I don't think that it needs to go in core to get signoffs. We could >> put it in extra and make an exception (i.e. require signoff). The >> only advantage of putting it in core is to offer it as an alternative >> kernel for the iso. >> >> > > Is there a disadvantage

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Dale Blount
> I don't think that it needs to go in core to get signoffs. We could > put it in extra and make an exception (i.e. require signoff). The > only advantage of putting it in core is to offer it as an alternative > kernel for the iso. > Is there a disadvantage to putting it in core? I'd say if I

Re: [arch-dev-public] Froscon pictures

2009-08-26 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 22:17, Firmicus wrote: > > Eh, Roman and Pierre can even be seen on linux-magazine.de ! > > http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Froscon-2009-Linuxtreffen-bei-Sonnenschein-Galerie/Galerie/%28offset%29/2 Hehe. If I'm not mistaken, the guy that is standing in front of me is our f

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Aaron Griffin > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: >>> i686 version is now also available. >>> >>> to the devs: please post your opinions where it should go after the >>> testi

Re: [arch-dev-public] Froscon pictures

2009-08-26 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:17:32 +0200 Firmicus wrote: > > Eh, Roman and Pierre can even be seen on linux-magazine.de ! > > http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Froscon-2009-Linuxtreffen-bei-Sonnenschein-Galerie/Galerie/%28offset%29/2 > > And Arch is even mentioned in the news article: > http://www.li

Re: [arch-dev-public] Froscon pictures

2009-08-26 Thread Firmicus
Eh, Roman and Pierre can even be seen on linux-magazine.de ! http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Froscon-2009-Linuxtreffen-bei-Sonnenschein-Galerie/Galerie/%28offset%29/2 And Arch is even mentioned in the news article: http://www.linux-magazin.de/content/view/full/43032 F

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mirrors supporting rsync

2009-08-26 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 23:08 +0200 schrieb Gerhard Brauer: > I could try to check until weekend all mirrors if their rsync access > works... I have now tried 3 mails with a list of rsync mirror URLs, seems all were filtered by spam filters on the way ;-) Here is the list. I worked wi

Re: [arch-dev-public] Away Thurs-Sun

2009-08-26 Thread Eduardo Romero
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:25:18 pm Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Daniel Isenmann wrote: > > Time for a short vacation. I will be back on Sunday evening. I have no > > internet access during this time. A weekend full of camping and > > hiking :) > > Neat! Take pictur

Re: [arch-dev-public] Away Thurs-Sun

2009-08-26 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Daniel Isenmann wrote: > > Time for a short vacation. I will be back on Sunday evening. I have no > internet access during this time. A weekend full of camping and > hiking :) Neat! Take pictures!

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Implement a hook-system that allows to add custom code to the initscripts at certain places

2009-08-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Kurt J. Bosch schrieb: Thank you for this one. I already tried this with initscripts-extras-fbsplash without any problems. :) I Keep watching initscritps-git, it will change again slightly before I release it. I hope to keep the hooks API stable after the next initscripts release though. W

[arch-dev-public] Away Thurs-Sun

2009-08-26 Thread Daniel Isenmann
Time for a short vacation. I will be back on Sunday evening. I have no internet access during this time. A weekend full of camping and hiking :) Daniel

Re: [arch-dev-public] [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Implement a hook-system that allows to add custom code to the initscripts at certain places]

2009-08-26 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Can you give suggestions regarding the hook names (I still find some of > them sound weird) and comment on whether more hooks are needed, or some > of them are badly placed? Can we add, perhaps, a file like /etc/rc.d/functions.d/hooks.exampl

[arch-dev-public] [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Implement a hook-system that allows to add custom code to the initscripts at certain places]

2009-08-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Implement a hook-system that allows to add custom code to the initscripts at certain places Datum: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:10:16 +0200 Von: Michael Towers An: Thomas Bächler Referenzen: <4a93c509.7060...@archlinux.org>

[arch-dev-public] [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Implement a hook-system that allows to add custom code to the initscripts at certain places]

2009-08-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Full-quoting, as your mail didn't go to the list. Michael Towers schrieb: 2009/8/25 Thomas Bächler : Thomas Bächler schrieb: A function add_hook can be called from functions.d to register a hook function. The existing hooks are based on suggestions from Michael Towers (larch) and on the implem

Re: [arch-dev-public] To the developers that went to froscon 09

2009-08-26 Thread Eduardo Romero
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 06:35:58 pm Pierre Schmitz wrote: > I collected some pictures and made a simple gallery: > http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/froscon/2009/ > > I only remove the totally broken or useless ones. I did not rescale either. > Maybe we can setup the gallery on gerolde later. Tha

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] syslog-ng-3.0.4-1

2009-08-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Allan McRae schrieb: Upstream update. Signoff both Allan /arch/signoff64 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] module-init-tools-3.10-1

2009-08-26 Thread Allan McRae
Upstream update. Signoff both. Allan

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] syslog-ng-3.0.4-1

2009-08-26 Thread Allan McRae
Upstream update. Signoff both Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] dhcpcd 5.0.7-1

2009-08-26 Thread Allan McRae
Dan McGee wrote: On Monday, August 24, 2009, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote: Hi, In testing for both arches, please signoff. Chages: - update to latest version Ronald bump, signoff please. Ronald signoff x86_64

Re: [arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: >> i686 version is now also available. >> >> to the devs: please post your opinions where it should go after the >> testing period? do you want it in extra or as official alternative even

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] fakeroot-1.13-1

2009-08-26 Thread Allan McRae
Upstream update. Signoff both. Allan