Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 12 September 2009 schrieb Dan McGee: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > HI guys, > > Shall i enable kms switch on per default on next .31 rebuild? > > Radeon will not work without this switch. > > Intel seems stable? > > Jan or anyone else any input on this?

[arch-dev-public] [Fwd: [pacman-dev] wiki trouble]

2009-09-11 Thread Allan McRae
Forwarding to arch-dev-public Original Message Subject:[pacman-dev] wiki trouble Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:55:27 -0400 From: Jeff Reply-To: Discussion list for pacman development To: pacman-...@archlinux.org I really hate that I'm sending to this list,

Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Dan McGee
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > HI guys, > Shall i enable kms switch on per default on next .31 rebuild? > Radeon will not work without this switch. > Intel seems stable? > Jan or anyone else any input on this? What? Why will radeon not work without this switch? I have

Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread James Rayner
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On 11/09/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> HI guys, >> Shall i enable kms switch on per default on next .31 rebuild? >> Radeon will not work without this switch. >> Intel seems stable? >> Jan or anyone else any input on this? > I am using

Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Freitag 11 September 2009 22:13:07 schrieb Andreas Radke: > If running kms fails on a system it happens in early state when > filesystems are not yet mounted. It was different for me; Console works fine but the X startup freezes the system and I had to reset it hard. Anyway, the new kernel do

Re: [arch-dev-public] Bluez maintainership

2009-09-11 Thread Jan de Groot
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 23:52 +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > > I'm building GNOME 2.27.92 at this moment, and I'm coming to the point > > where I have to package gnome-bluetooth. This package depends on a new > > package called obexd, which seems to be

Re: [arch-dev-public] Bluez maintainership

2009-09-11 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > I'm building GNOME 2.27.92 at this moment, and I'm coming to the point > where I have to package gnome-bluetooth. This package depends on a new > package called obexd, which seems to be in SVN, but not in the > repositories. It looks like som

[arch-dev-public] Bluez maintainership

2009-09-11 Thread Jan de Groot
I'm building GNOME 2.27.92 at this moment, and I'm coming to the point where I have to package gnome-bluetooth. This package depends on a new package called obexd, which seems to be in SVN, but not in the repositories. It looks like something that was left behind, or just never finished. Trying to

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] usr folder on ftp

2009-09-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Mittwoch 09 September 2009 14:42:57 schrieb Jan de Groot: > On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 16:37 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what is this? > > > > ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/i686/usr/ > > No idea why it's there, looks like an unpacked package. I deleted it > from gerolde, but

Re: [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.31-1

2009-09-11 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Ok guys, fixed all binary modules we have. Let's wait for the next bug fix version for .31 now. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-dev-public] away until 20th Sept.

2009-09-11 Thread Andreas Radke
Time for another week holiday. Hope you fix all my bugs meanwhile. CU. -Andy

Re: [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.31-1

2009-09-11 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Donnerstag 10 September 2009 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Hi guys, > kernel 2.6.31 first test run ... > > Upstream changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Arch Linux bugfixes: > - none > > Arch Linux changes: > -aufs module is now available as extra package: > http://bugs.archlin

Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:53:06 +0200 schrieb Pierre Schmitz : > Am Freitag 11 September 2009 21:34:15 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > > Intel seems stable? > > Does XV work now? With previous kernel it was disabled when using kms. > put "modeset=0" to the grub kernel append line and it's like having

Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Freitag 11 September 2009 21:34:15 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Intel seems stable? Does XV work now? With previous kernel it was disabled when using kms. -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 11/09/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > HI guys, > Shall i enable kms switch on per default on next .31 rebuild? > Radeon will not work without this switch. > Intel seems stable? > Jan or anyone else any input on this? I am using a i915 Intel and the only problem is that warning during boot. any

[arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Tobias Powalowski
HI guys, Shall i enable kms switch on per default on next .31 rebuild? Radeon will not work without this switch. Intel seems stable? Jan or anyone else any input on this? thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@ar

Re: [arch-dev-public] worth adding a "man-db" group + setuid for page caching?

2009-09-11 Thread Allan McRae
Andreas Radke wrote: Please have a look at the man page caching feature request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13694 Do we want to add it? I don't know how much the speed gain could be on slow systems. All my systems are very fast even with complex and long pages. Opinions? This comment f

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] nfs-utils-1.2.0-4

2009-09-11 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> Hi >> - fix #15950 >> , please signoff both arches. > Seems to be working here, although I was not to happy to see it > crashed my NFS server and I had to restart the nfs-server daemon

[arch-dev-public] worth adding a "man-db" group + setuid for page caching?

2009-09-11 Thread Andreas Radke
Please have a look at the man page caching feature request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13694 Do we want to add it? I don't know how much the speed gain could be on slow systems. All my systems are very fast even with complex and long pages. Opinions? -Andy

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-7.5-2

2009-09-11 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Freitag 11 September 2009 schrieb Allan McRae: > Allan McRae wrote: > > Updated the i18n patch to fix human numeric sorting (FS#15997). > > > > Signoff both, > > Anyone - I will be building 7.6 soon... > > Allan > signoff, no issues here on both arches. -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Develo

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-7.5-2

2009-09-11 Thread Allan McRae
Allan McRae wrote: Updated the i18n patch to fix human numeric sorting (FS#15997). Signoff both, Anyone - I will be building 7.6 soon... Allan