On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 21:09 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
When the intel-legacy package was introduced, the newest intel drivers
weren't working for some Intel cards like mine. There were lots of
artifacts that were making X practically unusable. I tried the
xf86-video-intel package but it
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
I got the legacy driver to compile yesterday, but it hangs up
completely. This Q35 system is forced to use the legacy driver, as this
system doesn't like UXA, and so doesn't work with xf86-video-intel. Not
with KMS, not
Am Mittwoch 14 Oktober 2009 01:18:51 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
Am Mittwoch 14 Oktober 2009 01:14:04 schrieb Xavier:
I am pretty sure I read someone in #nouveau saying the beta driver
worked.
confirmed; I'll put thos in testing. No idea about the older nvidia drivers
though.
According to
Allan McRae wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update.
Signoff x86_64
Anyone extracted a file on i686?
Bump
Allan McRae wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update
Looks good on x86_64
And for i686?
Bump
Allan McRae schrieb:
Allan McRae wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update.
Signoff x86_64
Anyone extracted a file on i686?
The only time I extract files on i686 is when using makepkg, but that
doesn't use
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Allan McRae schrieb:
Allan McRae wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Upstream update.
Signoff x86_64
Anyone extracted a file on i686?
The only time I extract files on i686 is when using makepkg,
Allan McRae schrieb:
The only time I extract files on i686 is when using makepkg, but that
doesn't use gzip, but zlib - most people will never use gzip directly
like that.
I think you can just move it, provided nobody seems to care.
If it helps, gzip is used to compress man and info pages
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update
Looks good on x86_64
And for i686?
Bump
yes, looks good too.
Ronald
community-testing is fetched but is not in REPOS array
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
From 8d5b50789ff7324619c178a076e9b04f60422312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:06:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] added community-testing
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.orgwrote:
Allan McRae schrieb:
The only time I extract files on i686 is when using makepkg, but that
doesn't use gzip, but zlib - most people will never use gzip directly like
that.
I think you can just move it, provided
Hi,
please remember to add permission to adopt packages in
[community-testing] to all TUs.
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
please remember to add permission to adopt packages in
[community-testing] to all TUs.
Wow... someone actually wants this! I did not expect that given
no-one adopts packages in [testing].
On 16/10/2009, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Wow... someone actually wants this! I did not expect that given
no-one adopts packages in [testing].
eh-eh, but I do!!
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
Hi all,
I will be doing a toolchain rebuild probably in the next few days
(update packages to binutils-2.20, gcc-4.4.2, kernel-headers-2.6.31.4
and pull a stable patchset for glibc (what is roughly proposed for
2.10.2 but little upstream movement on releasing...).
As I though I would bring
You should go with one splitted pkg. Reduces build time and workload a
lot.
I don't know how many files and space fortran and objc part take. If they
are small leave them in gcc-libs. If it's worth move them out into
seperate ones. Your choice.
We trust in you (Allan's fau).
-Andy
16 matches
Mail list logo
