Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.5-1

Thomas Bächler schrieb: New upstream release, please sign off. Hello? This wasn't supposed to stay in testing for more than just a few hours. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.5-1

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Thomas Bächler schrieb: >> >> New upstream release, please sign off. > > Hello? This wasn't supposed to stay in testing for more than just a few > hours. > > signoff i686

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] attr 2.4.44-1 && acl 2.2.48-1

Minor upstream updates, please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.5-1

Am Samstag 24 Oktober 2009 09:34:42 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Thomas Bächler schrieb: > > New upstream release, please sign off. > > Hello? This wasn't supposed to stay in testing for more than just a few > hours. sign-off x86_64 -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

[arch-dev-public] openswan

Hi, Does anyone care to maintain openswan in [core]. It is quite out of date and currently and orphan. Allan

[arch-dev-public] Remove "current" symlinks?

What do you think of removing those? [10:14:28][tho...@gerolde ftp]$ ls -lhF current core/os/*/current* lrwxrwxrwx 1 ftp ftp-arch 14 2008-11-21 02:41 core/os/i686/current.db.tar.gz -> core.db.tar.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 ftp ftp-arch 14 2008-11-21 02:41 core/os/x86_64/current.db.tar.gz -> core.db.tar.gz

Re: [arch-dev-public] Remove "current" symlinks?

Thomas Bächler wrote: What do you think of removing those? [10:14:28][tho...@gerolde ftp]$ ls -lhF current core/os/*/current* lrwxrwxrwx 1 ftp ftp-arch 14 2008-11-21 02:41 core/os/i686/current.db.tar.gz -> core.db.tar.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 ftp ftp-arch 14 2008-11-21 02:41 core/os/x86_64/current.db.t

Re: [arch-dev-public] openswan

Allan McRae schrieb: Hi, Does anyone care to maintain openswan in [core]. It is quite out of date and currently and orphan. Allan Tom maintained it back in the days. I wonder if we really need it in core - does anyone need ipsec for their internet access? signature.asc Description: O

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libevent 1.4.12-1

Upstream update. I do not use this so multiple signoffs are appreciated. Allan

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libldap 2.4.19-1

Upstream update. Signoff both, Allan

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] module-init-tools-3.11.1-1

Upstream update. Allan

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libfetch-2.26-1

upstream update signoff both Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libfetch-2.26-1

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > upstream update Pacman downloads still working, signoff x86_64

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] module-init-tools-3.11.1-1

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Upstream update. Reboot worked, signoff x86_64

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] attr 2.4.44-1 && acl 2.2.48-1

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Minor upstream updates, please sign off. Signoff x86_64

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mlocate-0.22.2-2

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Add nice/ionice usage to cron job.  Will be more important once we switch to > fcron. Working great here on x86_64

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.5-1

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Thomas Bächler schrieb: >> >> New upstream release, please sign off. > > Hello? This wasn't supposed to stay in testing for more than just a few > hours. And here's another i686 signoff

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] attr 2.4.44-1 && acl 2.2.48-1

Dan McGee wrote: On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Minor upstream updates, please sign off. Signoff x86_64 +1 i686 Allan