Ionut Biru wrote:
On 11/06/2009 02:04 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
Hi,
Minor upstream update. Please signoff for both architectures.
Ronald
signoff x86_64
signoff i686
Allan McRae wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Allan McRae schrieb:
Am Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:22:19 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
Upstream update.
Signoff both,
Allan
This package still has a useless post_install message displayed on
each upgrade. The message suggests that in the case of problems,
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
A new devtools release has been pushed to [testing]. Everything works
on a brief test here, but I thought it a good idea to do some testing
before pushing to [extra].
Is everyone happy with me moving this? We do have the issue of SRCDEST
not working that great in
Minor upstream updates, please signoff 2x per architecture.
-Dan
VERSION DESCRIPTION
-
3.3.3 - correctly check the return code from opendir()
- fix possible infinite loop in alpm_list_remove
On 11/10/2009 08:57 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Minor upstream update, please sign off. Tested on x86_64 only.
Btw, we should have a "fast to core" policy for minor kernel updates,
which means they should be signed off within 24 hours - let's try it.
signoff x86_64
--
Ionut
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Dienstag 10 November 2009 19:57:43 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> signed off
>>
> x86_64
Signoff i686
-Dan
Am Dienstag 10 November 2009 19:57:43 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> signed off
>
x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
hwclock calls appear to block somewhere between 1 and 2 seconds when we have
back-to-back calls. My theory (without looking at the code) is that hwclock
has to synchronize to the 1 second intervals of the hardware clock, so it
can sometimes take up to a second to complete.
To get around this unple
Minor upstream update, please sign off. Tested on x86_64 only.
Btw, we should have a "fast to core" policy for minor kernel updates,
which means they should be signed off within 24 hours - let's try it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Allan McRae schrieb:
>>
>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> I have put the glibc-2.11 toolchain rebuild in [testing]. Apart from
>>> glibc-2.11, the kernel header patch level got bumped to the latest version
>>> and I took a newer snapshot of the
James Rayner wrote:
Jan de Groot wrote:
I see a lot of bugs getting closed with "Upstream" lately because
they're not packaging bugs. This is not the way to solve bugs. The only
bugs that should be closed upstream are the ones in binary modules like
flashplugin or nvidia binary drivers. Opensour
Allan McRae schrieb:
Allan McRae wrote:
I have put the glibc-2.11 toolchain rebuild in [testing]. Apart from
glibc-2.11, the kernel header patch level got bumped to the latest
version and I took a newer snapshot of the binutils-2.20 branch.
From a quick look at the changelog there should no
12 matches
Mail list logo