Re: [arch-dev-public] [IDEA] no packages older than one year in repos

2010-02-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2010 14:05:21 schrieb Allan McRae: > I would like to propose that we ensure no package in the repos goes > unbuilt for more than a year. This could be even combined with a more regular repo cleanup. There is quite a chance that among those packages are orphans or unused p

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 2/2] Accept any *.pkg.tar.* package file name

2010-02-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Dienstag, 16. Februar 2010 01:27:32 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > With this patch packages with different compressions are accepted. It is > ensured that one cannot have the same package with different compression > extensions. > > The new functions getpkgfile{,s} are used to sanitize globed filena

Re: [arch-dev-public] [IDEA] no packages older than one year in repos

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 21/02/10 01:00, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: a slightly modified approach with some pros (no unnecessary rebuilds) I think you missed the part about it being good to rebuild things with the newer toolchain. So any binary package is worth rebuilding. I suppose arch=any packages could be skippe

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.8.0

2010-02-20 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:12, Dan McGee wrote: > New version in testing. Test using pacman or bsdtar. Upstream release > notes: http://code.google.com/p/libarchive/wiki/ReleaseNotes Looks like it now supports RPM. So now rpmextract can use bsdtar without doing rpm2cpio first. Yay! -- Roman Kyr

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iputils-20100214-1

2010-02-20 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 14:27, Allan McRae wrote: > On 20/02/10 20:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> >> New Release: >> [s20100214] > > > > Signoff i686, Signoff x86_64 -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

Re: [arch-dev-public] net-snmp 5.5 rebuild in [testing]

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 21/02/10 01:52, Eric Bélanger wrote: Hi, I've put net-snmp 5.5 in [testing]. It had a library soname bump so extra/fwbuilder extra/hplip extra/hpoj extra/libfwbuilder extra/php-snmp community/php52 community/rsyslog were rebuilt against it and are also in testing. Could someone (Allan? Pie

[arch-dev-public] net-snmp 5.5 rebuild in [testing]

2010-02-20 Thread Eric Bélanger
Hi, I've put net-snmp 5.5 in [testing]. It had a library soname bump so extra/fwbuilder extra/hplip extra/hpoj extra/libfwbuilder extra/php-snmp community/php52 community/rsyslog were rebuilt against it and are also in testing. Could someone (Allan? Pierre?) run the library check script to make

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 19-02-2010

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 21/02/10 01:39, Eric Bélanger wrote: On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote: I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been fine with makedepends in other repos. Another solution would be to use a whitelist so that the packages with out-of-repo

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 19-02-2010

2010-02-20 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been > fine with makedepends in other repos. > Another solution would be to use a whitelist so that the packages with out-of-repo makedepends that we are aware of, and

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 19-02-2010

2010-02-20 Thread Aaron Griffin
I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been fine with makedepends in other repos. PS sent from my phone, sorry if the format blows. I think it's top posting... On Feb 19, 2010 7:14 PM, "Xavier Chantry" wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, wrote: > Repo Hier

Re: [arch-dev-public] [IDEA] no packages older than one year in repos

2010-02-20 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
a slightly modified approach with some pros (no unnecessary rebuilds) and some cons (more administration overhead): - keep track of dates of all policy changes in a textfile/database. or just the date of the latest policy change. - rebuild packages if they are not rebuilt for $foo time and ther

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libusb-0.1.12-4

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 21/02/10 00:18, Jan de Groot wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 23:40 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: On 20/02/10 23:35, Jan de Groot wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: Hi, Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libusb-0.1.12-4

2010-02-20 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 23:40 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 20/02/10 23:35, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also > >> added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and t

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libusb-0.1.12-4

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/02/10 23:35, Jan de Groot wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: Hi, Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit. Do you have any ideas about a possible move to l

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libusb-0.1.12-4

2010-02-20 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also > added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a > bit. > > Signoff both, > Allan > Do you have any ideas about a possible move to li

Re: [arch-dev-public] [IDEA] no packages older than one year in repos

2010-02-20 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 20.02.2010 14:05, schrieb Allan McRae: > Hi, > > This is an idea I have been thinking about for a while. One > disadvantage of rolling release (at least with how we implement it), is > that some packages do not get rebuilt in a long time. That can mean > policy changes never get fully impleme

Re: [arch-dev-public] [IDEA] no packages older than one year in repos

2010-02-20 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2010/2/20, Allan McRae : > If people like this idea, I can add the packages to the unimportant rebuild > list wiki page > (http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Unimportant_Rebuild_List) > and gradually start doing to rebuilds. Once caught up, we can add a check > to the integrity che

[arch-dev-public] [IDEA] no packages older than one year in repos

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
Hi, This is an idea I have been thinking about for a while. One disadvantage of rolling release (at least with how we implement it), is that some packages do not get rebuilt in a long time. That can mean policy changes never get fully implemented (e.g. removal of .FILELIST from packages, mo

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pciutils-3.1.7-1

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/02/10 20:56, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi bump to latest version. Please signoff both arches. Signoff i686, Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iputils-20100214-1

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/02/10 20:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote: New Release: [s20100214] Signoff i686, Allan

[arch-dev-public] archboot release homepage created

2010-02-20 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, just created a archboot release homepage, would it be possible to link it somewhere on DOWNLOAD on our main page? ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/iso/archboot/index.html is the adress. thanks in advance greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libusb-0.1.12-4

2010-02-20 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 20 Februar 2010 schrieb Allan McRae: > Hi, > > Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also > added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a > bit. > > Signoff both, > Allan signoff both, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinu

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] which 2.20-2

2010-02-20 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 20 Februar 2010 schrieb Allan McRae: > Rebuild to get the info page compressed and remove the texinfo dependency. > > Signoff both, > Allan signoff both -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc D

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] which 2.20-2

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
Rebuild to get the info page compressed and remove the texinfo dependency. Signoff both, Allan

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] nfs-utils-1.2.2-1

2010-02-20 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi bump to latest version Please signoff both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper-utils-1.56-1

2010-02-20 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi bump to latest version. Please signoff both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] pciutils-3.1.7-1

2010-02-20 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi bump to latest version. Please signoff both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] iputils-20100214-1

2010-02-20 Thread Tobias Powalowski
New Release: [s20100214] Jamal Hadi Salim (2): ping: ping by mark ping: ping by mark doc update Jamie Le Tual (1): ping: set un.echo.id to network byte order YOSHIFUJI Hideaki (11): [PING6,TRACEROUTE6]: Ignore error in setting IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option for ICMPv6 socke

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libusb-0.1.12-4

2010-02-20 Thread Allan McRae
Hi, Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit. Signoff both, Allan