We had several discussions about lib32 and multilib support in the
past. It has been always our agreement to keep Arch x86_64 plain pure
64bit. Just KISS.
Any additional 32bit support should stay in the community area. Nothing
has changed here.
So please take care about the word official in this
Am 23.08.2010 12:00, schrieb Andreas Radke:
We had several discussions about lib32 and multilib support in the
past. It has been always our agreement to keep Arch x86_64 plain pure
64bit. Just KISS.
It has been YOUR agreement.
Any additional 32bit support should stay in the community area.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 23.08.2010 12:00, schrieb Andreas Radke:
We had several discussions about lib32 and multilib support in the
past. It has been always our agreement to keep Arch x86_64 plain pure
64bit. Just KISS.
It has been YOUR
Am 23.08.2010 12:43, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
Any additional 32bit support should stay in the community area. Nothing
has changed here.
We are doing more than that. We are separating 32bit support from
community, too. I want to make it a strict rule that no multilib package
can ever enter
On 2010/8/23 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
We are doing more than that. We are separating 32bit support from
community, too. I want to make it a strict rule that no multilib package
can ever enter community again. Or core. Or extra. (Btw, that rule would
imply that grub is being
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:00:14 +0200, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de
wrote:
We had several discussions about lib32 and multilib support in the
past. It has been always our agreement to keep Arch x86_64 plain pure
64bit. Just KISS.
Any additional 32bit support should stay in the community area.
On 23 August 2010 18:43, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
But well, I agree with Andreas, we should at least have a discussion
before we change something as drastic as this, this is the first time
I hear about providing official support for it and it to be already
official?
I was a
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:54 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
What kind of packages are expected to be found in a multilib
repository?
Should we keep with core/extra packages, leaving 32-bit versions of
community packages to AUR ? In more down-to-earth terms: are we going
to have
On 2010/8/23, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:54 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
What kind of packages are expected to be found in a multilib
repository?
Should we keep with core/extra packages, leaving 32-bit versions of
community packages to AUR ? In more
Am 23.08.2010 12:54, schrieb Rémy Oudompheng:
What kind of packages are expected to be found in a multilib repository?
Should we keep with core/extra packages, leaving 32-bit versions of
community packages to AUR ? In more down-to-earth terms: are we going
to have
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:16 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
Did I miss something or the 32 bit flashplugin can only be used in a
32-bit browser ? Wouldn't it be unconvenient to have the plugin in the
repo without some widely used browser ?
As for Wine, do I understand correctly if I say that
Am Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:19:59 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de:
new timezones - yeah. please signoff.
-Andy
The files...
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzcode2010l.tar.gz
...and...
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2010l.tar.gz
...are now available; these
Am Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:51:21 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de:
Am Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:47:16 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de:
Rebuilds removing the base-devel group because they are of rarely
use, closes http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18718
No other changes.
On 08/18/2010 09:19 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
new timezones - yeah. please signoff.
-Andy
The files...
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzcode2010l.tar.gz
...and...
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2010l.tar.gz
...are now available; these reflect the changes circulated last week
On 08/23/2010 08:37 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:51:21 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radkea.ra...@arcor.de:
Am Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:47:16 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radkea.ra...@arcor.de:
Rebuilds removing the base-devel group because they are of rarely
use, closes
Upstream update. Should fix http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20366
and adds support for unlock notification API
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19827.
Please test and give signoffs.
-Andy
See also
http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_7_1.html +
http://www.sqlite.org/news.html
Upstream fix for http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20371, not closing all
FTP connections.
-Dan
On 13/08/10 18:38, Ronald van Haren wrote:
Hi,
The patch I applied to -2 was rejected by upstream as although it
fixed the issue with the original source, it also re-enabled a bug
which was supposed to be fixed with the 2.6.35 release. Upstream has
applied an alternate fix which is applied to
On 17/08/10 21:36, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Added vboxsf to the list of pruned filesystems (FS#20234).
Signoff x86_64
Anyone for i686?
On 24/08/10 03:39, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 08/18/2010 09:19 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
new timezones - yeah. please signoff.
-Andy
The files...
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzcode2010l.tar.gz
...and...
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2010l.tar.gz
...are now available; these reflect the changes
On 24/08/10 03:59, Andreas Radke wrote:
Upstream update. Should fix http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20366
and adds support for unlock notification API
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19827.
Please test and give signoffs.
-Andy
See also
http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_7_1.html +
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 17/08/10 21:36, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Added vboxsf to the list of pruned filesystems (FS#20234).
Signoff x86_64
Anyone for i686?
Works for me
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 24/08/10 03:59, Andreas Radke wrote:
Upstream update. Should fix http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20366
and adds support for unlock notification API
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19827.
Please test and give signoffs.
23 matches
Mail list logo