Re: [arch-dev-public] Mirror status page

2010-09-30 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:24:28 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: >>> Getting this tied to an actual country object could make GeoIP >>> integration of some sort be useful later down the road. >> >> That was my intention. > > Haven't seen any progress on this. :) Hmm, did you expect me to do something? I am

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mirror status page

2010-09-30 Thread Dan McGee
Suggestions and things are quoted below. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Sander Jansen wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Just nitpicking here: putting "Unknown" into the columns messes up > sorting for certain columns. For example when sorting the out-of-sync > mirrors by score, from best-to-worst, it will p

Re: [arch-dev-public] Putting the process of adding new mirrors on hold

2010-09-30 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 15:16, Dan McGee wrote: >> If they are syncing and up-to-date >> (http://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/), then why remove them? That >> seems pretty silly to me. > > No known admin email address or no response. >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Putting the process of adding new mirrors on hold

2010-09-30 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 15:16, Dan McGee wrote: > If they are syncing and up-to-date > (http://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/), then why remove them? That > seems pretty silly to me. No known admin email address or no response. No known upstream. I agree that these may not be very solid reason

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] logrotate-3.7.9-1

2010-09-30 Thread Allan McRae
Upstream update. Signoff both, Allan.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Putting the process of adding new mirrors on hold

2010-09-30 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 30 September 2010 14:16, Dan McGee wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: >> On 30 September 2010 11:41, Roman Kyrylych wrote: >>> Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list >>> and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearin

Re: [arch-dev-public] Putting the process of adding new mirrors on hold

2010-09-30 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On 30 September 2010 11:41, Roman Kyrylych wrote: >> Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list >> and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearing quite often. >> However, not all mirrors are good

Re: [arch-dev-public] Putting the process of adding new mirrors on hold

2010-09-30 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 30 September 2010 11:41, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list > and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearing quite often. > However, not all mirrors are good ones (outdated, incomplete, admins > don't respond, etc). > I

[arch-dev-public] Putting the process of adding new mirrors on hold

2010-09-30 Thread Roman Kyrylych
Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearing quite often. However, not all mirrors are good ones (outdated, incomplete, admins don't respond, etc). I marked inactive many of them during past months (including a