Hi Devs and TUs.
in same rare cases it is needed to manually add or remove packages from
our repositories regardless what is in SVN. ATM theses cases are due to
e.g. svn crashing and leaving us with an inconsitent state or when some
split packages have been removed from a new version of the
Hello Devs and TUs,
as you might know some licenses require providing the sources somehow.
While fixing the sourceballs script which implements this I discovered
quit a lot of broken PKGBUILDs. We really need to fix those asap as this
also breaks ABS and makes rebuilds a real pain (and impossible
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:09:39 +0100, Pierre Schmitz
pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
I have setup a todo list which can be found at
http://www.archlinux.org/todo/48/ (there are also links to the raw logs
if you like to see why makepkg failed)
Somehow this list drop the split packages. A complete list
Hi,
i just pushed in staging repository boost 1.45. Note to all packagers
that they need to rebuild their packages against staging directory.
I've saw a trend in the past then staging was used that they didn't
enabled staging when building.
--
Ionuț
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:38:18 +0200, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Hi,
i just pushed in staging repository boost 1.45. Note to all packagers
that they need to rebuild their packages against staging directory.
I've saw a trend in the past then staging was used that they didn't
enabled
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:40:57 +0100, Pierre Schmitz
pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Hi all,
I recently adopted the orphaned package filesystem and made a little
review/rewrite. Some of the changes may be questionable so don't
hesitate to give suggestions.
Pushed -2 into testing to fix/implement
My boss just brought this book over to my desk. It's one of those
theory books that's all about measuring lines of code and whatnot.
But the reason he brought it over, is Chapter 8: Beyond Lines of
Code: Do We Need More Complex Metrics?. Two pages in, it begins with:
**Measuring the Source
On 22 November 2010 19:39, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
My boss just brought this book over to my desk. It's one of those
theory books that's all about measuring lines of code and whatnot.
But the reason he brought it over, is Chapter 8: Beyond Lines of
Code: Do We Need More
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:39:57 -0600
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
My boss just brought this book over to my desk. It's one of those
theory books that's all about measuring lines of code and whatnot.
But the reason he brought it over, is Chapter 8: Beyond Lines of
Code: Do We
On 23/11/10 07:09, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:39:57 -0600
Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
My boss just brought this book over to my desk. It's one of those
theory books that's all about measuring lines of code and whatnot.
But the reason he brought it over, is
Am 21.11.2010 09:14, schrieb Eric Bélanger:
Hi,
lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.76-1 are in testing. Please test and signoff.
Signoffs from users are welcome.
- Minor upstream update. ChangeLog below.
Signoff both architectures. Only tested booting from LVM, as always.
signature.asc
= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community =
Performing integrity checks...
== parsing pkgbuilds
== parsing db files
== checking mismatches
== checking archs
== checking dependencies
== checking
==
= Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra,community =
==
Performing integrity checks...
== parsing pkgbuilds
== parsing db files
== checking mismatches
== checking archs
== checking dependencies
==
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:52:14 -0500 (EST), repoma...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Summary
-
Missing PKGBUILDs: 0
Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0
Mismatching PKGBUILD names:0
Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 12
Invalid archs:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Maybe it would be way more portable if we would just call the vercmp
binary; or maybe python has such a method built-in like PHP has.
I've used distutils.version to some success for this sort of thing.
Not sure if it
On Monday 22 November 2010 22:52:14 repoma...@archlinux.org wrote:
Duplicate PKGBUILDs
-
/srv/abs/rsync/any/community/adesklet-weatherforecast vs.
/srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/adesklet-weatherforecast
/srv/abs/rsync/any/community/cgmail vs.
On Monday, November 22, 2010, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Maybe it would be way more portable if we would just call the vercmp
binary; or maybe python has such a method built-in like PHP has.
I've used
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:13:16 -0600, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, November 22, 2010, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Maybe it would be way more portable if we would just call the vercmp
[2010-11-20 20:35:54 +1000] Allan McRae:
Remove sourcing ~/inputrc from /etc/inputrc (FS#21729)
signoff i686
[2010-11-19 16:21:27 +0100] Andrea Scarpino:
- use package()
- remove from base group
- use tar.xz
signoff i686
[2010-11-22 19:31:48 +0100] Pierre Schmitz:
I recently adopted the orphaned package filesystem and made a little
review/rewrite. Some of the changes may be questionable so don't
hesitate to give suggestions.
Pushed -2 into testing to fix/implement
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21759
[2010-11-20 12:55:06 +0100] Pierre Schmitz:
I rebuild both packages due to core cleanup/rebuild. I have also moved
the file /etc/conf.d/wireless from wireless_tools to initscripts, where
it really belongs. Future versions of initscripts might remove support
for wireless/network then.
signoff
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Hi devs,
I repaired the sourceball creation script the last days. I didn't
active the cron job yet as a couple of packages should be fixed first
(will send a new mail about that)
* Similar to the package pool there
* Rebuild of old package
* Tidy up PKGBUILD
* Avoid building of locate (provided by mlocate)
Please signoff both.
Thanks
Stéphane
Hi,
Can we get some details of what the perl-5.12.2 rebuild list is for? Its
description is Build modules that have binary modules in them but
surely there is binary compatibility between 5.12.1 and 5.12.2... Or
have the expected paths for binaries changed again?
Allan
25 matches
Mail list logo
