Am Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:49:03 +0100
schrieb Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de:
Upstream update. Please sign off.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.32.27
-Andy
Anyone? It's also fixes a vulnerability.
On 04/12/10 11:48, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
- Major upstream update
- re-enabled capabilities (this was disabled due to FS#15787, but was fixed
upstream - untested...)
Signoff i686
Anyone for x86_64?
On 07/12/10 07:57, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2010-12-03 20:09:13 +1000] Allan McRae:
Fix up of the .install file to remove texinfo dep (FS#21762).
signoff i686
Anyone for x86_64?
Am Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:04:27 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
On 07/12/10 07:57, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2010-12-03 20:09:13 +1000] Allan McRae:
Fix up of the .install file to remove texinfo dep (FS#21762).
signoff i686
Anyone for x86_64?
nothing broken here, signoff
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Am Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:49:03 +0100
schrieb Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de:
Upstream update. Please sign off.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.32.27
-Andy
Anyone? It's also fixes a
On 12/10/2010 09:21 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Upstream update.
Added -DSQLITE_SECURE_DELETE to allow Firefox to use
system sqlite3 again #20797. Added a -doc split pkg containing
the html documentation.
signoff x86_64
--
Ionuț
Upstream update.
Signoff both,
Allan
Am Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:03:54 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
On 04/12/10 11:48, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org
wrote:
- Major upstream update
- re-enabled capabilities (this was disabled due to FS#15787, but
was fixed
Am 10.12.2010 23:44, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.36 series for both arches,
Please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
Signoff 64.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 11.12.2010 10:03, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 04/12/10 11:48, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
- Major upstream update
- re-enabled capabilities (this was disabled due to FS#15787, but
was fixed
upstream - untested...)
Signoff i686
Am 11.12.2010 00:07, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi guys,
- fixed libusb-compat depend
Seems I forgot to add it to the depend line.
Please signoff both arches to fix this missing depend.
greetings
tpowa
Signoff 64.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/12/10 21:37, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 11.12.2010 10:03, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 04/12/10 11:48, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
- Major upstream update
- re-enabled capabilities (this was disabled due to FS#15787, but
was fixed
Le 11 décembre 2010 05:12:06, Allan McRae a écrit :
Upstream update.
Signoff both,
Allan
Signoff x86_64
Stéphane
On 12/10/2010 05:49 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Upstream update. Please sign off.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.32.27
-Andy
signoff i686
--
Ionuț
Hi,
I am in the progress of updating the toolchain and thought it time to
review what our minimum required kernel version is for glibc.
For those that do not know, assuming a newer kernel allows glibc to have
less workarounds compiled in. So it may be advantagous to have a more
recent
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Upstream update.
Added -DSQLITE_SECURE_DELETE to allow Firefox to use
system sqlite3 again #20797. Added a -doc split pkg containing
the html documentation.
-Andy
See http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_7_4.html
On 12/11/2010 05:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
I am in the progress of updating the toolchain and thought it time to
review what our minimum required kernel version is for glibc.
For those that do not know, assuming a newer kernel allows glibc to have
less workarounds compiled in. So it may be
[2010-12-11 20:12:06 +1000] Allan McRae:
Upstream update.
signoff i686
--
Gaetan
Am 11.12.2010 16:49, schrieb Allan McRae:
I am going to suggest that we follow the oldest longterm support kernel.
That would now be the 2.6.27.x series, which has been around for over
two years.
That might be being overly bold, so feel free to point out how much such
an update would
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:49:45 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Hi,
I am in the progress of updating the toolchain and thought it time to
review what our minimum required kernel version is for glibc.
For those that do not know, assuming a newer kernel allows glibc to
have less
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:23, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
What do you think? Would you agree in general? Is a year too short or
too long?
I think one year is too short. Maybe 2?
On 12/12/10 02:12, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/11/2010 05:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
I am in the progress of updating the toolchain and thought it time to
review what our minimum required kernel version is for glibc.
For those that do not know, assuming a newer kernel allows glibc to have
less
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12/11/2010 05:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
I am in the progress of updating the toolchain and thought it time to
review what our minimum required kernel version is for glibc.
For those that do not know, assuming a
Le 11 décembre 2010 11:44:38, Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:49:45 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Hi,
I am in the progress of updating the toolchain and thought it time to
review what our minimum required kernel version is for glibc.
For those that
24 matches
Mail list logo
