On Tuesday 14 December 2010 08:40:52 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> I still like to have a sign off for these. :-)
signoff x86_64
--
Andrea Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 08:21:41 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Morning,
>
> this is a minor update to the filesystem package and I hope we can
> finally move it to core. Only change is:
>
> * don't check if profiles are executable; FS#22036
>
> Please sign off,
signoff x86_64
--
Andrea Scarpino
On 14/12/10 17:40, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:40:56 +0200, Pierre Schmitz
wrote:
Hi,
these are upstream updates and a fix of the install script when
installing into a new environment.
Greetings,
Pierre
I still like to have a sign off for these. :-)
Signoff both,
Allan
-git PKGBUILD as it is already done for r300
> >
> > (make -C ${srcdir}/build/src/gallium/targets/dri-r600
> > DESTDIR="${pkgdir}" install)
> >
> > I test current (20101213) git snapshot.
> >
> > May be put it into testing and enable on next
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:40:56 +0200, Pierre Schmitz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> these are upstream updates and a fix of the install script when
> installing into a new environment.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Pierre
I still like to have a sign off for these. :-)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pie
Morning,
this is a minor update to the filesystem package and I hope we can
finally move it to core. Only change is:
* don't check if profiles are executable; FS#22036
Please sign off,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Not to nitpick, and glad to see these things getting attention, but...
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> Date: Monday, December 13, 2010 @ 08:44:48
> Author: stephane
> Revision: 102953
>
> upgpkg: expat 2.0.1-6
> Tidy up PKGBUILD, Rebuild of old package
>
> Modifi
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> Le 13 décembre 2010 16:09:51, Eric Bélanger a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> links-2.3pre1-1 is in testing.
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> - Upstream update
>> - Added xlinks binary with X and frame buffer support along with
>> .desktop file and icons
>> -
Am 13.12.2010 07:47, schrieb Eric Bélanger:
> Hi,
>
> lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.78-1 are in testing. Please test and signoff.
> Signoffs from users are welcome.
>
> - Minor upstream update. ChangeLog below.
Signoff both.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[2010-12-12 19:11:42 -0500] Eric Bélanger:
> procps-3.2.8-3 is in testing. Added patch to fix "Unknown HZ value!"
> on some machines.
signoff i686
--
Gaetan
Le 13 décembre 2010 16:09:51, Eric Bélanger a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> links-2.3pre1-1 is in testing.
>
> Changes:
>
> - Upstream update
> - Added xlinks binary with X and frame buffer support along with
> .desktop file and icons
> - Added calibration documentation
> - Removed old patches and ChangeLog
Hi,
links-2.3pre1-1 is in testing.
Changes:
- Upstream update
- Added xlinks binary with X and frame buffer support along with
.desktop file and icons
- Added calibration documentation
- Removed old patches and ChangeLog
Please test and signoff.
Eric
On 2010/12/13 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> bump. Anyone x86_64 ?
yep, signoff x86_64
--
Rémy.
Le 9 décembre 2010 13:10:56, Gaetan Bisson a écrit :
> [2010-12-09 07:47:45 -0500] Stéphane Gaudreault:
> > * Rebuild of old package
> > * Use system popt and glib
>
> signoff i686
bump. Anyone x86_64 ?
Le 12 décembre 2010 20:04:07, Dan McGee a écrit :
> Got very little feedback on this last time...any votes? Saw another
> thread[1] in the forums today about it causing problems with mpd this
> time around...
>
> -Dan
>
> [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=109962
>
> On Fri, Sep 10,
Am 13.12.2010 16:23, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to switch our current PHP setup on gudrun to use php-fpm. This
> also means switching back from fcgid to mod_fastcgi as that is missing
> something like FastCGIExternalServer; see
> http://httpd.markmail.org/message/pnj6pkxjmulrt3v
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:00:17 -0600, Dan McGee
wrote:
> If you don't need to switch it all at once, maybe trial it with bugs
> first (being a lower traffic subsite), work out the kinks, and then
> roll it out to everything. But otherwise no objections.
Sure, forgot to mention it. I guess I'll star
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to switch our current PHP setup on gudrun to use php-fpm. This
> also means switching back from fcgid to mod_fastcgi as that is missing
> something like FastCGIExternalServer; see
> http://httpd.markmail.org/message/pnj6p
Hello,
I'd like to switch our current PHP setup on gudrun to use php-fpm. This
also means switching back from fcgid to mod_fastcgi as that is missing
something like FastCGIExternalServer; see
http://httpd.markmail.org/message/pnj6pkxjmulrt3vo?q=php-fpm
PHP-FPM is a process manager that comes with
On 13/12/10 21:44, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
Le 12 décembre 2010 18:51:24, Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
Hi,
the main difference between this and bash from [core] is that
/etc/profile.bash has been removed as it is no longer sourced by
/etc/profile (see filesystem package). This package was in test
Le 12 décembre 2010 19:11:42, Eric Bélanger a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> procps-3.2.8-3 is in testing. Added patch to fix "Unknown HZ value!"
> on some machines.
> Please test and signoff.
>
> Eric
Signoff x86_64
Stéphane
Le 12 décembre 2010 18:51:24, Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> the main difference between this and bash from [core] is that
> /etc/profile.bash has been removed as it is no longer sourced by
> /etc/profile (see filesystem package). This package was in testing for 2
> weeks and I am not aware of
[2010-12-13 10:41:23 +0100] Thomas Bächler:
> It seems inconsistent to have to mess with hosts.{allow,deny} for some
> applications and not for others. The question is, can all these
> applications be built without tcp_wrappers support?
There are also network applications that don't support it at
Am 13.12.2010 03:04, schrieb Allan McRae:
> On 13/12/10 11:04, Dan McGee wrote:
>> Got very little feedback on this last time...any votes? Saw another
>> thread[1] in the forums today about it causing problems with mpd this
>> time around...
>>
>
> Never particularly used it... and if iptables is
[2010-12-12 19:04:07 -0600] Dan McGee:
> Got very little feedback on this last time...any votes?
I'm personally happy to get rid of it.
Since nobody said otherwise last time you brought that up, I assume
everybody using tcp_wrappers now will gladly switch to iptables.
--
Gaetan
25 matches
Mail list logo
