Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pam 1.1.3-1

2011-01-04 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Mon, 3 Jan 2011 23:58:41 +0100 schrieb Tobias Powalowski : > Release 1.1.3 > > * pam_namespace: Clean environment for childs (CVE-2010-3853) > * libpam: New interface to drop/regain privilegs > * Drop root privilegs in pam_env, pam_mail and pam_xauth before > accessing user files (CVE-2010-3

Re: [arch-dev-public] Inclusion of RAR

2011-01-04 Thread Ray Rashif
OK it's all good. The author seems pretty cool about it. See forwarded message below for the final conversation. -- Forwarded message -- From: Eugene Roshal <...> Date: 4 January 2011 17:21 Subject: Re: Fwd: Redistribution of RAR for Linux in binary package form To: Ray Rashif

Re: [arch-dev-public] Inclusion of RAR

2011-01-04 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-01-04 13:24:42 +0800] Ray Rashif: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Eugene Roshal <...> > Date: 4 January 2011 03:02 > Subject: Re: Fwd: Redistribution of RAR for Linux in binary package form > To: Ray Rashif > > > (2) This 'RAR for Linux' is a trial version of your produ

Re: [arch-dev-public] Inclusion of RAR

2011-01-04 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 12:16:04 Gaetan Bisson wrote: > Personally I think unrar is sufficient for most people so I don't think > we need to package a program with such strict licensing terms. I think that we don't need rar in our repos too. -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] Inclusion of RAR

2011-01-04 Thread Ray Rashif
On 4 January 2011 19:16, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > Personally I think unrar is sufficient for most people so I don't think > we need to package a program with such strict licensing terms. Yes, that's correct. There is still some public education needed to encourage use of 7z for when archival/compre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Inclusion of RAR

2011-01-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
Il 03/01/2011 17:55, Ray Rashif ha scritto: Hi guys During the recent community package addition sprint I noticed someone mentioning rar [1], so I looked into any possible reason why it was never brought into the repositories (not that I personally have any need for it). I found none. Ubuntu app

[arch-dev-public] why the hurry???

2011-01-04 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Mon, 3 Jan 2011 23:12:15 +0100 schrieb Tobias Powalowski : > Hi guys. > upstream release: > udev 165 > > Bugfixes. > > The udev database has changed, After installation of a new udev > version, 'udevadm info --convert-db' should be called, to let the new > udev/libudev version read th

Re: [arch-dev-public] why the hurry???

2011-01-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.01.2011 17:38, schrieb Andreas Radke: > I've just updated udev and after a relogin to X no input was possible > with keyboard or mouse. I had to ssh into it and reboot the system. > Now it's working. > > I'm not sure if the above mentioned 'udevadm info --convert-db' would > have prevent thi

[arch-dev-public] Xfce 4.8pre3 hits testing

2011-01-04 Thread Andreas Radke
Xfce 4.8pre3 is now in testing. Be warned that not all goodies and panel plugins have yet been ported and fixed to work with it! Please give feedback here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=874625 -Andy

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.9-1

2011-01-04 Thread Allan McRae
Upstream bug fix release: split no longer creates files with a suffix length that is dependent on the number of bytes or lines per file. [bug introduced in coreutils-8.8] Signoff both, Allan