Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community, multilib 07-01-2011

2011-01-08 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
There's actually a circular dependency our scripts do not detect : gcc-libs-multilib depends on lib32-gcc-libs which depends on gcc-libs (provided by gcc-libs-multilib). -- Rémy.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] usbutils-001-1

2011-01-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Dienstag 04 Januar 2011 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Am Dienstag 04 Januar 2011 schrieb Dan McGee: On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: usbutils 001 Version numbering changed a options=('force') is needed for this upgrade. please

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] module-init-tools-3.12-2

2011-01-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Donnerstag 06 Januar 2011 schrieb Gaetan Bisson: [2011-01-06 13:48:52 +1000] Allan McRae: Enable support for gzip compressed modules. signoff i686 signoff both no issues here, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.9-1

2011-01-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011 schrieb Allan McRae: Upstream bug fix release: split no longer creates files with a suffix length that is dependent on the number of bytes or lines per file. [bug introduced in coreutils-8.8] Signoff both, Allan signoff both -- Tobias Powalowski

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] usbutils-001-1

2011-01-08 Thread Allan McRae
On 08/01/11 22:07, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Am Dienstag 04 Januar 2011 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Am Dienstag 04 Januar 2011 schrieb Dan McGee: On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Tobias Powalowskit.p...@gmx.de wrote: usbutils 001 Version numbering changed a options=('force') is

Re: [arch-dev-public] MySQL 5.5

2011-01-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:11:11 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote: On Monday 03 January 2011 17:55:25 Pierre Schmitz wrote: At least there was no so name bump on that lib. If you like to have a list of all packages that link to libmysqlclient.so.16 let me know. A simple rebuild might fix those clients

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] usbutils-001-1

2011-01-08 Thread Dan McGee
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 08/01/11 22:07, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Am Dienstag 04 Januar 2011 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Am Dienstag 04 Januar 2011 schrieb Dan McGee: On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Tobias Powalowskit.p...@gmx.de  wrote:

[arch-dev-public] See if developers are awake (and please update your timezone)

2011-01-08 Thread Dan McGee
Developers and TUs, There is a new page on the website: https://www.archlinux.org/devel/clock/ But it requires you to exert 15 seconds of effort- please update your timezone setting on your developer profile: https://www.archlinux.org/devel/profile/ If you are just a user, sorry, this message

Re: [arch-dev-public] See if developers are awake (and please update your timezone)

2011-01-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 12:18:56 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: Developers and TUs, There is a new page on the website: https://www.archlinux.org/devel/clock/ But it requires you to exert 15 seconds of effort- please update your timezone setting on your developer profile:

Re: [arch-dev-public] definition of the core repo, putting nilfs-utils, btrfs-progs and dosfstools in core

2011-01-08 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 12/22/2010 09:26 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:14:19 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: I realise I just suggested some pretty radical changes, but in my mind they make a lot of sense. I hope I didn't miss some obvious downsides (please point them out), I will (and I hope you

Re: [arch-dev-public] nilfs-utils moving in core

2011-01-08 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 12/07/2010 03:40 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, i come across https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20261 and i see Dieter added support in aif for it but it needs to be added in core to include it on the cd. Don't know why nobody assigned that bug to me since i'm the maintainer of nilfs-utils even

Re: [arch-dev-public] nilfs-utils moving in core

2011-01-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 08 Januar 2011 schrieb Ionuț Bîru: On 12/07/2010 03:40 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, i come across https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20261 and i see Dieter added support in aif for it but it needs to be added in core to include it on the cd. Don't know why nobody assigned that

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.28-1

2011-01-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Latest LTS kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-dev-public] See if developers are awake (and please update your timezone)

2011-01-08 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 12:18:56 -0600 Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: Developers and TUs, There is a new page on the website: https://www.archlinux.org/devel/clock/ But it requires you to exert 15 seconds of effort- please update your timezone setting on your developer profile:

Re: [arch-dev-public] definition of the core repo, putting nilfs-utils, btrfs-progs and dosfstools in core

2011-01-08 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 22.12.2010 20:26, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: I think the core repo and its sign-off policy has proven itself to be a good idea. But we could make a little adjustment to our signoff policy to solve your filesystem package problem. Agreed. [core]: This contains everything you need to boot up,

Re: [arch-dev-public] See if developers are awake (and please update your timezone)

2011-01-08 Thread Dan McGee
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 12:18:56 -0600 Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: Developers and TUs, There is a new page on the website: https://www.archlinux.org/devel/clock/ But it requires you to exert 15 seconds of

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel-2.6.36.3-1

2011-01-08 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 8 janvier 2011 14:20:58, Tobias Powalowski a écrit : Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.37 currently resides there), but at: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/ please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa Signoff x86_64 Stéphane