Re: [arch-dev-public] boost 1.46 rebuild

2011-03-02 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > Hi, > > the new version has a change that concern us. It uses filesystem v3 as > default and if your packages doesn't build anymore you have to force to > build using v2. > > export CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=2" > > > -- >

Re: [arch-dev-public] boost 1.46 rebuild

2011-03-02 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 03/03/2011 12:03 AM, Giovanni Scafora wrote: Il 02/03/2011 18:22, Ionuț Bîru ha scritto: Hi, the new version has a change that concern us. It uses filesystem v3 as default and if your packages doesn't build anymore you have to force to build using v2. export CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -DBOOST_FI

Re: [arch-dev-public] boost 1.46 rebuild

2011-03-02 Thread Giovanni Scafora
Il 02/03/2011 23:15, Ionuț Bîru ha scritto: it would be cool next time to paste the error too. For me now works to build this package using 1.46-2. Well, the next time I will paste the error too. Previous package has a missing dependency and linking was failing. (namcap failure from my part)

Re: [arch-dev-public] boost 1.46 rebuild

2011-03-02 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 03/02/2011 11:42 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote: Il 02/03/2011 18:22, Ionuț Bîru ha scritto: Hi, the new version has a change that concern us. It uses filesystem v3 as default and if your packages doesn't build anymore you have to force to build using v2. export CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -DBOOST_FI

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] shadow 4.1.4.3-1

2011-03-02 Thread Eric Bélanger
Hi, shadow 4.1.4.3-1 is now in testing. - minor upstream update to fix the vulnerability CVE-2011-0721: An insufficient input sanitation in chfn can be exploited to create users or groups in a NIS environment. Therefore, some quick signoffs would be appreciated. Eric

Re: [arch-dev-public] boost 1.46 rebuild

2011-03-02 Thread Giovanni Scafora
Il 02/03/2011 18:22, Ionuț Bîru ha scritto: Hi, the new version has a change that concern us. It uses filesystem v3 as default and if your packages doesn't build anymore you have to force to build using v2. export CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=2" I am having trouble buildin

Re: [arch-dev-public] boost 1.46 rebuild

2011-03-02 Thread Giovanni Scafora
Il 02/03/2011 18:22, Ionuț Bîru ha scritto: Hi, the new version has a change that concern us. It uses filesystem v3 as default and if your packages doesn't build anymore you have to force to build using v2. export CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=2" source-highlight doesn't bu

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-lts - 2.6.32.30-1

2011-03-02 Thread Andreas Radke
Upstream update with security fixes. Breaks build on x86_64. I had to revert one single patch for x86_64. more about the breaker: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1107677 Please give signoffs quickly. -Andy

[arch-dev-public] boost 1.46 rebuild

2011-03-02 Thread Ionuț Bîru
Hi, the new version has a change that concern us. It uses filesystem v3 as default and if your packages doesn't build anymore you have to force to build using v2. export CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=2" -- Ionuț

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] linux-firmware 20110227-1

2011-03-02 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-02-27 16:17:35 +0100] Thomas Bächler: > Latest git snapshot, includes a new iwl5000 firmware (which fixes > serious issues, but is not used by the kernel driver yet). Signoff x86_64. -- Gaetan pgpbZ99U2dg3T.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-4 & co

2011-03-02 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 03/02/2011 06:45 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 02.03.2011 17:28, schrieb Allan McRae: Is there something I am missing or should util-linux-ng be removed too? Allan Yes, it is obsolete and must go. i forgot about it and noticed when i tried to update my chroots :) -- Ionuț

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-4 & co

2011-03-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 02.03.2011 17:28, schrieb Allan McRae: > Is there something I am missing or should util-linux-ng be removed too? > > Allan Yes, it is obsolete and must go. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-4 & co

2011-03-02 Thread Allan McRae
On 02/03/11 21:57, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 03/01/2011 11:26 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote: Op 1 mrt. 2011 22:24 schreef "Ionuț Bîru" het volgende: On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote: Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good. I'm going to move in couples of hour

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-4 & co

2011-03-02 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 03/01/2011 11:26 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote: Op 1 mrt. 2011 22:24 schreef "Ionuț Bîru" het volgende: On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote: Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good. I'm going to move in couples of hours this packages: kernel26 2.6.37.2-1

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ppl-0.11.2-1

2011-03-02 Thread Jan Steffens
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Upstream bug fix release.   All test suite passes. > > Signoff both, > Allan > Signoff both.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ppl-0.11.2-1

2011-03-02 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 28 février 2011 05:53:49, Allan McRae a écrit : > Upstream bug fix release. All test suite passes. > > Signoff both, > Allan Signoff i686 (on the basis that nothing is broken) Stéphane

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.8.0-1

2011-03-02 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 1 mars 2011 23:08:25, Allan McRae a écrit : > Fairly major update, with a new plugin interface (although nothing > > should change for those not using it): > > Sudo 1.8.0 implements a plugin architecture that allows third-party > > policy and I/O logging modules to be used. It includes a "su

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash-4.2.004-1 and readline-6.2.001-1

2011-03-02 Thread Jan Steffens
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Lets try this update again...   without the patch that causes bash to break! >   My system now reboots nicely. > > Note that I did not use force on the bash-4.2.004-1 package, as users should > have seen the message to downgrade from bash-4.2.00

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash-4.2.004-1 and readline-6.2.001-1

2011-03-02 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-03-01 20:08:27 -0500] Stéphane Gaudreault: > Le 1 mars 2011 10:13:42, Allan McRae a écrit : > > Lets try this update again... without the patch that causes bash to > > break! My system now reboots nicely. > > Nothing broken here. > > Signoff x86_64 Another 64-bit signoff from here. --

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ppl-0.11.2-1

2011-03-02 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2011-02-28 20:53:49 +1000] Allan McRae: > Upstream bug fix release. All test suite passes. Signoff x86_64. -- Gaetan