On 08/03/2011 10:30 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
Hi,
Please signoff for both architectures. If you can, please test the
install-grub script if it detects your kernel (it should detect the
new naming scheme as well as the lts kernel).
This should move together with the linux 3.0
changes:
- Updat
On 08/06/2011 08:22 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 17:58:53 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Hi,
please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
Signing off for x86_64 (two machines) and i686 (virtualbox; updated
from core to testing here)
signoff i686
--
Ionuț
Le 6 Août 2011 17:58:53 Thomas Bächler a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
>
> Note: the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 is not entirely smooth if
> you rely on the vmlinuz26 compat symlink. However, the upgrade path from
> core/kernel26 to this version is
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 17:58:53 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
Signing off for x86_64 (two machines) and i686 (virtualbox; updated
from core to testing here)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> I'd like to add a libgraphite2 pkg replacing libgraphite because it has
>> its own version scheme.
>
> That sounds like a fine use case for the epoch option.
Agreed, we're not Debi
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> I'd like to add a libgraphite2 pkg replacing libgraphite because it has
> its own version scheme.
That sounds like a fine use case for the epoch option.
On 06.08.2011 17:58, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
>
Works fine so signoff x86_64, but I noticed strange messages in my dmesg:
> snd: Unknown symbol unregister_sound_special (err 0)
> snd: Unknown symbol register_sound_special_device (err
I'd like to build LibreOffice against our system libgraphite. We need
to switch to the rewritten libgraphite2 (1.0.1 release).
I'd like to add a libgraphite2 pkg replacing libgraphite because it has
its own version scheme.
Do you know any other pkg depending on libgraphite expect LibO and
texlive
Hi,
please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
Note: the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 is not entirely smooth if
you rely on the vmlinuz26 compat symlink. However, the upgrade path from
core/kernel26 to this version is smooth.
Upstream changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChang
I am going to push linux 3.0.1-1 into testing in a few. As mentioned in
the previous thread, the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 will not be
very smooth, as the vmlinuz26 compat symlink will vanish (this does not
concern you if you already fixed your bootloader).
However, the upgrade path from
On 06.08.2011 11:53, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 6 August 2011 17:19, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> It may look complicated, but it is the right thing to do. Provide
>> backward compatibility for those who need it, and don't clutter the
>> system with legacy stuff for others.
>
> I've been testing the upgr
On 6 August 2011 17:19, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> It may look complicated, but it is the right thing to do. Provide
> backward compatibility for those who need it, and don't clutter the
> system with legacy stuff for others.
I've been testing the upgrade path in a couple of ways (both stock and
a c
Am 06.08.2011 08:52, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> On 05/08/11 15:54, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> It seems somebody (Evangelos, Tobias, who else?) completely
>> misunderstood the "compat symlink" idea for a smooth upgrade path.
>
> Compatibility is retained in a consistent way; all systems end up wit
On 06/08/11 09:52, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
[..]
Sorry for the "OMG BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE" noise; I now have PGP/MIME
enabled by default so any future signatures should come as attachments
and not inline.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
