Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > To make a long story short; in stead of fixing the "storage" group, I > intend to remove support for it from udev, and direct people to use > udisks instead. Or, if they don't want udisks, then su root. Given how much damage you can do with

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

[2011-08-28 00:43:29 +0200] Tom Gundersen: > To make a long story short; in stead of fixing the "storage" group, I > intend to remove support for it from udev, and direct people to use > udisks instead. If anyone have any objections, pleas let me know. That sounds very good to me. -- Gaetan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > I'm refactoring our support for the "storage" group, due to a recent > bug report about it being incomplete: > . I thought I'd ask for some > input. I did a bit more digging and asking around, and it s

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] lzo2-2.06-1

[2011-08-26 14:38:36 +0200] Tobias Powalowski: > Changes in 2.06 (12 Aug 2011) > * Some minor optimizations for big-endian architectures. > * Fixed overly strict malloc() misalignment check in example Signoff x86_64. -- Gaetan pgpyKdTRPPlRT.pgp Description: PGP signature